The Fool's Razor: Choose Theory That Pleases Most

  • Thread starter Alkatran
  • Start date
In summary: We might not understand what it is, but we know it exists. And it gives us a way to make sense of the world. With religion, we find a sense of purpose, a way to connect with something bigger than ourselves. It doesn't provide us with a tangible understanding of the "something" (at least not yet), but it gives us a way to cope. Broad, sweeping generalizations. I like it.
  • #1
Alkatran
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
959
0
When choosing between two competing theories, the one which is most pleasing should be favored. :rolleyes:

Just figured I'd give the theists something to shave with, too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Alkatran said:
When choosing between two competing theories, the one which is most pleasing should be favored. :rolleyes:

Just figured I'd give the theists something to shave with, too.

I think you are just being condescending. I might formulate a principle for programmers too. How about:

When choosing anything whatsoever, whatever makes one most like a robot is the one to be favored. :smile:
 
  • #3
Les Sleeth said:
I think you are just being condescending. I might formulate a principle for programmers too. How about:

When choosing anything whatsoever, whatever makes one most like a robot is the one to be favored. :smile:

Nono, whatever one is more efficient! Less lines! Less computation time! beep beep zlurp!
 
  • #4
I'm not sure I get your point. Well, I'm sure I don't get your point. Are you suggesting it is more pleasing for there to be (a) God(s) or more pleasing for there to be no God(s)? You do see how it is unclear that one is more pleasing than the other, right? Especially if your verision of God is the fire and brimstone punitive enforcer father figure with a huge flaming whip that will damn you at the first hint of sin or disbelief, I don't see how theism is more pleasing than the alternatives.

So are you suggesting that athiests choose athiesm because it is more pleasing OR that theists choose theism because it is more pleasing?
 
  • #5
Both get pleasure from thinking they have the right answer.
 
  • #6
Both get pleasure from thinking they have the right answer.

Broad, sweeping generalizations. I like it.

I might as well say that scientists take pleasure in thinking they have the wrong answer, if we were to continue this game, Mr. Science Advisor.
 
  • #7
No, it's true. No matter which theory anyone chooses, the longer they stay with it the more they like it. It is not very often you find someone who doesn't like what they believe (well, except perhaps someone who was recently converted).

I suppose this would be the same effect as the one where you favor evidence for your theory?


Think about it: everyone thinks they're right, moral, ETC and gets annoyed when other people don't agree with them.


The thread was intended as a minor joke, anyways.
 
  • #8
Alkatran said:
No, it's true. No matter which theory anyone chooses, the longer they stay with it the more they like it. It is not very often you find someone who doesn't like what they believe (well, except perhaps someone who was recently converted).

I suppose this would be the same effect as the one where you favor evidence for your theory?


Think about it: everyone thinks they're right, moral, ETC and gets annoyed when other people don't agree with them.


The thread was intended as a minor joke, anyways.

I don't get annoyed if someone disagrees with me for a rational reason, sometimes even I will rethink my stand on certain issues if rational points are brought up to support a certain viewpoint. I think making the generalization that everyone thinks they are right within their own viewpoint is stepping over the line, perhaps that is your viewpoint, thus you believe everyone else thinks this.
 
  • #9
Alkatran said:
The thread was intended as a minor joke, anyways.

I thought you were ridiculing people who believe in God, or who at least suspect some sort of consciousness is behind creation. A lot of people probably do believe out of conditioning, fear, or because it is more appealing than believing death is the end.

One of the points I've made before is that there are aspects to consciousness not fully appreciated by the Western concept of consciousness. One is that it is possible to develop one's conscious sensitivity. If one can learn to feel deeply enough (and by "feel" I don't mean emotion), then one detects something very subtle going on behind apparent reality.

The studies and theories of science are completely about the apparent, about what the senses can detect, about the physicalness of reality. People who've become proficient at experiencing that subtle background thing rely on the "heart" of consciousness, not the senses; it is from them the most reliable reports of "something more" have come, and not from ordinary religious belief.

If you just look at this subject superficially, maybe your taunt fits in some way. But then, you've now become someone yourself who has opinions without really understanding the full extent of the issue you are opinionated about.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
The world is a crazy place, and if we simply existed, without any beliefs, we might feel completely lost and hopeless. These two views (science and religion) are two ways of gaining at least the illusion of control. With science, we find all this chaos arises from simple rules that we can understand and use to our advantage. With religion, God is in control, and he is on our side.

It is impossible, despite what some may think, to decide which is correct. With religion, you believe God created our human reasoning, and anything we deduce with it, especially pertaining to science, is only what he wants us to. With science, you believe our reasoning is a valid tool, and the conclusions we draw about the world using it are also valid, including the strong possibility that religion is only a convenient way to avoid the hard questions and the fear of death. They are each self-consistent. You decide which one you want to believe, or maybe a little of both, and then that's that.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Les Sleeth said:
I thought you were ridiculing people who believe in God, or who at least suspect some sort of consciousness is behind creation. A lot of people probably do believe out of conditioning, fear, or because it is more appealing than believing death is the end.

Maybe I should have said I was giving everyone something to shave with. My bad.
 
  • #12
alcatran:
The Fool's Razor
When choosing between two competing theories, the one which is most pleasing should be favored.

Just figured I'd give the theists something to shave with, too.
__________________
Sometimes I dream about going faster and faster, the universe shrinking into my grasps...
----------------------------------------------
Theist my friend is you too
why you say that,youre not shaved
theist my friend is dream on
let me tell you something,is the universe really shrinking into your grasp?
 
  • #13
man the universe is shrinking into my head and ill give something the theist
to shave their ###
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Razor? Pah!
I use Occam's Easy-Off Wax-strips.
 

1. What is "The Fool's Razor: Choose Theory That Pleases Most"?

"The Fool's Razor: Choose Theory That Pleases Most" is a concept that suggests that when faced with multiple theories or explanations, the simplest and most agreeable one should be chosen. It is based on the principle of Occam's razor, which states that the simplest explanation is often the most accurate.

2. How does "The Fool's Razor" differ from Occam's razor?

While "The Fool's Razor" is based on Occam's razor, it adds the additional factor of choosing the theory that pleases the most people. This takes into consideration the potential impact and acceptance of the theory, rather than just simplicity.

3. Why is it important to consider the satisfaction of others when choosing a theory?

In scientific research, the ultimate goal is to gain knowledge and understanding. By choosing a theory that pleases the most people, it increases the likelihood of widespread acceptance and potentially leads to further advancements and discoveries in the field.

4. Does "The Fool's Razor" apply to all scientific disciplines?

While the concept can be applied to many fields of science, it may not be applicable in all cases. Some fields may require more complex theories to explain phenomena, and others may have differing priorities when it comes to choosing a theory.

5. How can "The Fool's Razor" be used in real-life scenarios?

"The Fool's Razor" can be applied in various real-life situations, such as decision-making processes, problem-solving, and evaluating different perspectives on a topic. It can also be used as a guiding principle in scientific research and discussions, promoting collaboration and open-mindedness.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
859
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
51
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
898
Replies
1
Views
714
  • General Discussion
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
6
Replies
190
Views
9K
Replies
9
Views
962
  • General Discussion
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top