Have You Heard Any Unconventional Ideas for Detecting Neutrinos?

In summary, there was a discussion about "far out there" ideas for neutrino detection. Some suggestions included using heavy water in a solar orbit, burying photomultiplier tubes at the South Pole, using the moon as active material, and the ANITA results. Other ideas involved Z-boson condensates and dense fluxes of W or Z bosons. However, it was noted that these ideas may not be allowed to be discussed due to PF Rules. The person who initiated the conversation was looking for food for thought and hoping for new ideas to emerge.
  • #1
grokkin
Gold Member
4
0
Has anyone come across any "far out there" ideas for neutrino detection? Just looking for some food for thought.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If such ideas are so "far out" that they haven't been published in peer-reviewed journals, then they can't be discussed here, per the PF Rules.

Zz.
 
  • #3
Hopefully there's some allowance made for original thought, so long as it's based on reasonable physics. For example, I'm sure no-one ever published a proposal to detect solar neutrinos by placing enormous tanks of heavy water in an intra-Mercurian solar orbit, yet who could say where a discussion of that idea would lead? It sounds silly, but it might have a less-silly variation.
 
  • #4
Hm, for example we could bury a gigantic array of photomultiplier tubes at the South Pole, and look for Cherenkov radiation in the ice. But that idea is just too silly!
 
  • #5
You could use the moon as active material and detect impacts there with radio telescopes on earth. Is that far out enough?
A bit more earth-based are the ANITA results - balloons, flying 35km over antarctica.
 
  • #6
The methods we use already AREN'T far out enough?
 
  • #7
Far out ideas: something like a Z-boson condensate (whatever that means)... or a dense flux of W or Z bosons orthogonal to the path of neutrinos... something along those lines. I was just looking for some food for thought... something to think about over the next say 5 years and hopefully end up with something more fleshed out than just random speculation. Something outside of liquid argon methods or the ice cube, etc... something that would meaningfully increase the probability of detection besides just increasing the size of the detector. I fully realize that no currently known methods exist that fit this criteria. I was hoping to solicit speculation and perhaps something interesting might emerge from the discussion. Any thoughts?
 
  • #8
Yes - those are exactly the sort of ideas that Zz warned about.
 

1. What is a neutrino?

A neutrino is a subatomic particle that has a very small mass and no electric charge. It is one of the fundamental particles that make up the universe and is a key player in many astrophysical phenomena.

2. How do we detect neutrinos?

Neutrinos are detected using a variety of methods, including large underground detectors, neutrino telescopes, and neutrino beams. These methods involve detecting the products of interactions between neutrinos and other particles, such as light or charged particles.

3. Why is neutrino detection important?

Neutrino detection is important for understanding the fundamental properties of the universe, including the origin and evolution of stars and galaxies. It also has practical applications, such as in the study of nuclear reactors and potential applications in communication and medical imaging.

4. What are some current ideas for improving neutrino detection?

Some current ideas for improving neutrino detection include building larger and more sensitive detectors, as well as developing new technologies for detecting and measuring neutrinos. There is also ongoing research into using artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques to improve data analysis and detection efficiency.

5. What challenges do scientists face in neutrino detection?

One of the main challenges in neutrino detection is the extremely small interaction rate of neutrinos with matter. This means that detectors need to be very sensitive and have a large volume in order to detect a significant number of neutrinos. Another challenge is distinguishing neutrino interactions from background noise and other particles, which requires sophisticated data analysis techniques.

Similar threads

I A test for a superluminal neutrino?
    • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
A IceCube rules out last SM explanation of ANITA’s anomalous neutrinos
    • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Open Questions about Neutrinos Today
    • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
3
Replies
80
Views
11K
I Neutrino Detection: Theories & Improvements
    • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
2K
B Neutrino/anti-neutrino interactions on video
    • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Understanding Neutrino Detectors & All-Neutrino Detection
    • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
2K
A Parameters of neutrino interactions in targets?
    • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
I How Does Beta Decay Relate to the Role of W Bosons in Weak Nuclear Force?
    • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
I How do the collider experiments measure the mass of the W boson?
    • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Why do neutrinos always have a specific flavor when detected?
    • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top