Transfusion/marrow transplant for aids treatment

  • Medical
  • Thread starter TeX
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Treatment
In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of using a similar treatment method for retroviral infections, specifically HIV, as is used for blood cancers like leukemia. The main question is why this method is not being applied and if it could potentially cure HIV/AIDS. The potential process would involve destroying infected immune system cells through radiation and a new transfusion of blood and bone marrow from a donor, and then using new drugs to prevent the integration of new retroviral DNA segments in the newly received healthy cells. However, there are concerns about the presence of infected cells in hard tissues and the practicality of using blood transfusions for HIV/AIDS patients. The conversation also mentions recent developments in enzyme and drug treatments that may hold promise for curing HIV/AIDS.
  • #1
TeX
3
0
If the problem of retroviral infection is, like for example HIV, viral DNA segment integration in human DNA of immune system cells, why cannot be the same or similar method as used in treatment of patients with leukemia or blood cancers be applied here? What is preventing this? Couldn't infected immune system cells be destroyed with radiation and a new transfusion of blood and bone marrow transplant from donor? Couldn't be remaining viruses and infected immune system cells in blood be externally separated (filtered/collected - something like in kidney failure paitents)? Wouldn't such procedures eradicate the virus and remove infected immune system cells? The new healthy ones from donor would then in absence of viruses repopulate the patient. It would be risky, given the low immunity of such patient, but if blood cancer patients can survive such procedures, why couldn't this be helpful for aids patients? Wouldn't surgical removal of lymph nodes and spleen, combined with radiation, blood transfusion and bone marrow transplant eradicate hiv and cure aids?

..so, why is such procedure not working here (the analogy with blood cancer treatment)? Is it because infected immune system cells are not limited only to blood and are present in hard tissues too? Even if viruses could not be separated from blood but only infected immune system cells could, wouldn't new integrase inhibition drugs prevent integration of new retroviral DNA segments in newly received healthy immune system cells from donor?

..thanks to anyone for clarification of this topic.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
I have been thinking of this kind of procedure for over a year now. I came to a conclusion that it can be done. There is no reason why a blood transfusion can't get rid of infected cells and replaced them or some with new ones by the donar's blood. The whole process would be a mess. No one wants to waste blood for HIV or AIDS patients because we tend to say that they don't deserve it or other patiens might need it more. Therefore, we lean towards drugs that prohibit the virus entering into the cells. But, recently I have heard of this Enzyme that actually finds the infected cells and cuts out the embeded DNA. If that is true, then the new drug D-peptides which mounts to the virus's GP41 or GP120 along with this enzyme should be enought to almost cure a patient. In addition, if a blood transfusion is done along with these new treatments I think a cure for AIDS is somthing that patients can look forward to.
 
  • #3
TeX said:
if blood cancer patients can survive such procedures,

This is not a completely valid assertion. If you are interested in this subject, please Google leukemia-lymphoma society, American Cancer Society, Johns Hopkins, Cleveland Clinic, Mayo Clinic, NIH.
 

What is a transfusion/marrow transplant and how does it relate to AIDS treatment?

A transfusion/marrow transplant is a medical procedure where healthy blood or bone marrow is given to a person with a disease or condition that affects their blood cells. In the case of AIDS treatment, a transfusion or marrow transplant may be used to help replace damaged or infected blood cells with healthy ones.

Can a transfusion/marrow transplant cure AIDS?

No, a transfusion/marrow transplant cannot cure AIDS. However, it may help improve the overall health and immune system of a person with AIDS, allowing them to better fight off infections and diseases.

What are the risks associated with a transfusion/marrow transplant for AIDS treatment?

There are several risks associated with a transfusion/marrow transplant for AIDS treatment, including rejection of the donor cells, infection from the donated blood or marrow, and graft-versus-host disease (a condition where the donor cells attack the recipient's body). Additionally, the procedure may weaken the recipient's immune system, making them more susceptible to infections.

Who is eligible for a transfusion/marrow transplant for AIDS treatment?

Transfusion/marrow transplants are typically reserved for people with severe cases of AIDS or those who have developed other conditions, such as certain types of cancer, as a result of their weakened immune system. Eligibility for a transplant will depend on a person's overall health and the availability of a suitable donor.

Are there any alternative treatments to a transfusion/marrow transplant for AIDS?

There are currently no alternative treatments available for AIDS that are as effective as a transfusion/marrow transplant. However, there are other treatment options, such as antiretroviral therapy, that can help manage the symptoms of AIDS and improve a person's quality of life.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
993
  • Biology and Medical
3
Replies
74
Views
8K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
759
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
19
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top