Moment of Inertia of (Right) Cone

In summary, the conversation discusses finding the moment of inertia of a right circular cone with respect to its axis using solids of revolution. Two different approaches are discussed, one using the formula for moment of inertia and one taking into account the geometry of the solid. The latter is found to be the correct method, resulting in a moment of inertia of 3mr^2/10.
  • #1
Demon-Machine
3
0

Homework Statement


Find the moment of inertia of the right circular cone or radius r and height h with respect to its axis, and in terms of its mass.

*As of this point, I am supposed to use solids of revolution, and so I need to rotate a line about an axis, and find the moment of inertia with respect to that axis. I only know basic integration at this point.

Homework Equations


The textbook given equations for moment of inertia of the solid of revolution about the x-axis and y-axis are:

[tex]I_{y}=2\pi\rho\int_a^b yx^3\ dx [/tex]
[tex]I_{x}=2\pi\rho\int_c^d xy^3\ dy [/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I set up a line with the equation [tex]y=(\frac{h}{r} )x[/tex] to be rotated about the y-axis. Applying the formula i get:
[tex]I_{y}=2\pi\rho\int_a^b\ yx^3 dx [/tex]
[tex]I_{y}=2\pi\rho\int_0^r\ ((\frac{h}{r} )x)x^3 dx [/tex]
[tex]I_{y}=(\frac{2\pi\rho\ h}{r})\int_0^r\ x^4 dx [/tex] which simplifies to:
[tex]I_{y}=(\frac{2\pi\rho\ h}{r})\cdot\frac{r^5}{5} = \frac{2\pi\rho hr^4}{5}[/tex]

Since the volume of this cone is [tex]\frac{\pi\rho hr^2}{3}[/tex]
[tex]I_{y}= \frac{2\pi\rho hr^4}{5}= \frac{6r^2}{5}\cdot \frac{\pi\rho hr^2}{3}[/tex]
[tex]I_{y}= \frac{6mr^2}{5}[/tex] Which is wrong because it is too large, and because the correct answer is [tex]I_{y}= \frac{3mr^2}{10}[/tex].

I've done this a few times and feel stupid because I still can't find my mistake. I suspect it is an obvious one, or has to do with simply "plugging in" info into the formula.

I am learning some calculus on my own over the summer, so I don't have anyone to ask other than the members of this forum. As this is my first post on this forum, I hope some of the members will make any suggestions as to my posting/question. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Look at this: [tex]y=(\frac{h}{r} )x[/tex]. It says that at x=0 the height of your 'cone' is 0 and at x=r it is h. And you are rotating around the origin. This doesn't sound quite like a cone to me.
 
  • #3
Hmm, I was probably unclear in explaining how I set up the problem. Since the book I am using only covers plain old two-variable equations (no multivariable stuff like [tex]z^2=x^2+y^2[/tex]), the only way I know how to calculate volumes of solids is to rotate equations (or the areas bounded by those equations) around the axis. A better way to calculate the moment of inertia is probably with a triple integral, but I don't know how to do that yet. This means that rotating the line x=3 about the y-axis from y=0 to y=3 (the equivalent of rotating the rectangular area bounded by x=0, x=3, y=0, and y=3) generates a cylinder of radius 3 and height 3. (I'm not trying to teach you this stuff, just trying to give the context of how I have learned it:frown:).

Then, for a specific example in the text, the question states: "To generate a right circular cone of radius a and altitude h, we may rotate a right triangle about one of its legs. Placing the leg of length h along the x-axis, we rotate the right triangle whose hypotenuse is given by [tex]y=(\frac{a}{h} )x[/tex] about the x-axis." The only difference between this question setup and my setup is that I'm rotating about the y-axis, and so the line [tex]y=(\frac{h}{r} )x[/tex] should be just fine for generating a cone that is rotated around the y-axis unless I am missing some other glaringly obvious mistake. Besides, I tried the question by setting up a cone as in the previous example, and I still get the same (incorrect) result.

Dick said:
Look at this:[tex]y=(\frac{h}{r} )x[/tex]. It says that at x=0 the height of your 'cone' is 0 and at x=r it is h. And you are rotating around the origin. This doesn't sound quite like a cone to me.
I'm not sure what you mean, because I am not rotating around the origin, but about the y-axis. Also, the cone does have a height of 0 when x=0 and a height of h at x=r. The x seems to me to only act as a sort of parameter for this stuff, and is kind of arbitrary because I only need to integrate from 0 to r to obtain the cone of the desired dimensions. Anyway, its late and I'm not thinking straight, so please point out any errors in my above reasoning. Oh, and thanks for taking interest Dick.
 
  • #4
You aren't seeing the geometry you are integrating correctly - possibly because the formulas you are working with don't make that explicit. In your formula, x is the distance from the axis of the cone. Then you are integrating dy from 0 to x*(h/r). Your solid doesn't look like a cone - it looks like a cylinder with a cone subtracted. Change x*(h/r) to h*(1-x/r) and you will get the book answer.
 
  • #5
Ahah! Now I see exactly where I went wrong; I can now see two ways to solve the problem. I can set it up as you suggested, with a line with the equation [tex]y=h(1-\frac{x}{r} )[/tex] and then use my "formula" to integrate from 0 to r.
[tex]I_{y}=2\pi\rho\int_a^b yx^3\ dx [/tex]
[tex]I_{y}=2\pi\rho\int_0^r (h(1-\frac{x}{r} ))x^3\ dx [/tex]
[tex]I_{y}=2\pi\rho h\int_0^r x^3-\frac{x^4}{r} dx [/tex]
[tex]I_{y}=\frac{\pi\rho hr^4}{10} =\frac{3r^2}{10} \cdot \frac{\pi\rho hr^2}{3}[/tex]
[tex]I_{y}=\frac{3}{10} mr^2[/tex]

Alternately, I could realize that the y in the formula actually symbolizes the height of the representative element, and that it is therefore equal to h-y for the line [tex]y=(\frac{h}{r} )x[/tex]. This means
[tex]I_{y}=2\pi\rho\int_a^b yx^3\ dx [/tex]
[tex]I_{y}=2\pi\rho\int_0^r (h-y)x^3\ dx [/tex]
[tex]I_{y}=2\pi\rho\int_0^r (h-((\frac{h}{r} )x))x^3\ dx [/tex]
[tex]I_{y}=2\pi\rho h\int_0^r x^3-\frac{x^4}{r} dx [/tex] and this is the same as above. This is messy though, and I think your way is the more correct option, Dick.

Glad that issue was cleared up; that's the second time the textbook has introduced a misleading formula (or perhaps I am just misleading myself:rolleyes:). Thanks for the help and the great first impression of the forum!
 

1. What is the formula for calculating the moment of inertia of a right cone?

The moment of inertia of a right cone can be calculated using the formula I = 3/10 * mr^2, where m is the mass of the cone and r is the radius of the base.

2. How does the moment of inertia of a right cone compare to other shapes?

The moment of inertia of a right cone is smaller than that of a cylinder with the same mass and radius. It is also smaller than that of a solid sphere with the same mass and radius.

3. Can the moment of inertia of a right cone change?

Yes, the moment of inertia of a right cone can change if there is a change in the mass or radius of the cone. It can also change if the cone is rotating around a different axis.

4. What is the significance of the moment of inertia of a right cone?

The moment of inertia of a right cone is important in understanding the rotational motion of the cone. It helps determine how much torque is needed to accelerate or decelerate the cone, and how it will respond to external forces.

5. How is the moment of inertia of a right cone related to the parallel axis theorem?

The moment of inertia of a right cone can be calculated using the parallel axis theorem, which states that the moment of inertia of a body can be found by adding the moment of inertia of the body's center of mass to the product of its mass and the square of the distance between the center of mass and the axis of rotation.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
660
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
948
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
488
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
34
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
904
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
829
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
838
Back
Top