No it's as Andy said. You don't have to put the name of the secretary who typed the paper.dans595 said:Another possibility is the author has a disability that makes it difficult to write.
The phrase "communicated by" in a journal article refers to the person or group who first submitted the research or findings to the journal for publication. This person is typically the lead author of the study or an individual who played a significant role in the research process.
The "communicated by" line is important because it gives credit to the individual or group who conducted the research and allows readers to understand the original source of the information presented in the article. It also helps to establish the credibility of the research and provides a way for others to contact the authors for further information or collaboration.
No, "communicated by" and "written by" are not the same. "Communicated by" refers to the person or group who first submitted the research to the journal, while "written by" typically refers to the individuals who actually wrote the article itself. In some cases, these may be the same person or group, but in others, they may be different.
Yes, it is common for multiple people to be listed under "communicated by" in a journal article. This can be the case when a research team or group has collaborated on the study and all members have played a significant role in the research process. In this case, the names are typically listed in the order of their contribution to the study.
If there is no "communicated by" line in a journal article, it could mean that the author(s) submitted the research directly to the journal without going through a third party. It could also mean that the author(s) chose not to include this information in the article. However, this does not necessarily affect the credibility of the research as long as the author(s) are properly cited and the source of the information is clearly stated.