The Humans and Chimpanzees PP article.

  • Thread starter Mentat
  • Start date
  • Tags
    article
In summary: I could be wrong.Originally posted by Monique I just now noticed that there's no "Physicspost.com Articles" Forum here anymore, so I don't know if there's been any discussion on this article, but I've got a couple of questions:1) How different is the DNA of a chimp, when compared to another ape - like a gorilla?2) If we are only 95% identical (genetically) to chimps, does that raise any dispute on whether there was a common ancestor, or on how long ago the divergance from that common ancestor occured?
  • #1
Mentat
3,960
3
The "Humans and Chimpanzees" PP article.

I just now noticed that there's no "Physicspost.com Articles" Forum here anymore, so I don't know if there's been any discussion on this article, but I've got a couple of questions:

1) How different is the DNA of a chimp, when compared to another ape - like a gorilla?

2) If we are only 95% identical (genetically) to chimps, does that raise any dispute on whether there was a common ancestor, or on how long ago the divergance from that common ancestor occured?

Any response is appreciated. :smile:

BTW, this was a very good article, and I highly recommend it.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
Here is the article btw: http://physicspost.com/articles.php?articleId=31 [Broken]
 
Last edited:
  • #3
A quick remark (I can comment more later) researchers at Wayne State University School of Medicine did genomic analysis of genes and came to the conclusion that chimps belong to the genus Homo.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/05/0520_030520_chimpanzees.html

Current naming:
Chimp - Pan troglodytes
Human - Homo sapiens

Suggested change:
Chimp - Homo troglodytes

That was about 6 months ago when the article got published in PNAS, I am not sure how the scientific community has digested the news though..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6


Originally posted by Mentat
I just now noticed that there's no "Physicspost.com Articles" Forum here anymore, so I don't know if there's been any discussion on this article, but I've got a couple of questions:

1) How different is the DNA of a chimp, when compared to another ape - like a gorilla?
I am actually not sure..

2) If we are only 95% identical (genetically) to chimps, does that raise any dispute on whether there was a common ancestor, or on how long ago the divergance from that common ancestor occured?
Why would that cause a dispute whether there was a common ancestor?? The 95% identity, is probably based on the entire genomic sequences. In the recent article, researchers looked at genes and found that our identity is much higher: the functional important genes show 99.4% identity, while the not so important ones show 98.4% identity.

Here is the abstract of the article:
What do functionally important DNA sites, those scrutinized and shaped by natural selection, tell us about the place of humans in evolution? Here we compare approximately 90 kb of coding DNA nucleotide sequence from 97 human genes to their sequenced chimpanzee counterparts and to available sequenced gorilla, orangutan, and Old World monkey counterparts, and, on a more limited basis, to mouse. The nonsynonymous changes (functionally important), like synonymous changes (functionally much less important), show chimpanzees and humans to be most closely related, sharing 99.4% identity at nonsynonymous sites and 98.4% at synonymous sites. On a time scale, the coding DNA divergencies separate the human-chimpanzee clade from the gorilla clade at between 6 and 7 million years ago and place the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees at between 5 and 6 million years ago. The evolutionary rate of coding DNA in the catarrhine clade (Old World monkey and ape, including human) is much slower than in the lineage to mouse. Among the genes examined, 30 show evidence of positive selection during descent of catarrhines. Nonsynonymous substitutions by themselves, in this subset of positively selected genes, group humans and chimpanzees closest to each other and have chimpanzees diverge about as much from the common human-chimpanzee ancestor as humans do. This functional DNA evidence supports two previously offered taxonomic proposals: family Hominidae should include all extant apes; and genus Homo should include three extant species and two subgenera, Homo (Homo) sapiens (humankind), Homo (Pan) troglodytes (common chimpanzee), and Homo (Pan) paniscus (bonobo chimpanzee).
 
  • #7


Originally posted by Monique
I am actually not sure..

Where might one find such information?

Why would that cause a dispute whether there was a common ancestor??

Well, at least on how far back in the lineage the common ancestor was...since the divergance would be greater.

The 95% identity, is probably based on the entire genomic sequences. In the recent article, researchers looked at genes and found that our identity is much higher: the functional important genes show 99.4% identity, while the not so important ones show 98.4% identity.

Wow!
 
  • #8
Originally posted by Phobos
I'm still wondering whether "Australopithecus troglodytes" is more appropriate.

Why's that? Did we also descend from australopithecus (this subject's obviously not my forte )?
 
  • #9


Originally posted by Mentat
Where might one find such information?
Well, go to PubMed, that is where all biotech related articles get indexed into a searchable database:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed

NCBI is the National Center for Biotechnology Information
NLM is the National Library of Medicine

I don't think the gorilla genome has been sequences, do you'd have to rely on different genomic techniques to compare the identity between the chimp and the gorilla..
 

1. What is the main difference between humans and chimpanzees?

The main difference between humans and chimpanzees is their genetic makeup. While both species share approximately 98% of their DNA, the remaining 2% contains key genetic differences that contribute to the unique physical and behavioral characteristics of each species.

2. Are humans and chimpanzees closely related?

Yes, humans and chimpanzees are closely related. They are both part of the Hominidae family and share a common ancestor that lived approximately 6-7 million years ago.

3. Can humans and chimpanzees interbreed?

No, humans and chimpanzees cannot interbreed. Although they share a high percentage of DNA, there are significant genetic barriers that prevent successful reproduction between the two species.

4. Do humans and chimpanzees have similar cognitive abilities?

Yes, humans and chimpanzees have similar cognitive abilities. They both have the ability to use tools, communicate and solve complex problems. However, humans have a more advanced cognitive capacity due to our larger brain size and development of language.

5. How do humans and chimpanzees differ in terms of physical characteristics?

Humans and chimpanzees differ in terms of physical characteristics in several ways. Humans have a more upright posture and walk on two legs, while chimpanzees primarily walk on all fours. Humans also have a larger brain size, more complex facial features, and less body hair compared to chimpanzees.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
0
Views
683
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
15K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
Back
Top