What are the safety requirements for BWR and PWR core margin and boiling?

In summary, the main differences between BWRs and PWRs in the case of SEFs are related to coolability design and core margin. PWRs have steam generators that cool the primary loop through auxiliary systems, while BWRs have a suppression pool that directly cools the reactor coolant. PWRs are not designed for boiling, while BWRs are intended to boil. Both rely on safety systems to control temperature, pressure, and reactivity for public safety. The debate over which design is better or worse, simpler or more complex, riskier or less risky has been ongoing for years. To fully understand the differences, it is recommended to refer to the US NRC General Design Criteria.
  • #1
matt222
132
0
What is the difference between BWR and PWR in the case of SEFs?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
matt222 said:
What is the difference between BWR and PWR in the case of SEFs?

There are two very basic differences one in terms of coolability design and the second in terms of margin to fuel limits.

A PWR has steam generators which contain large volumes of water which is separate from the primary coolant loop. This volume will cool the primary loop as auxiliary feedwater systems pump additional water into the steam generators. They can also be vented to atmosphere to cool and reduce pressure.

In a BWR pressure relief is from safety valves to the suppression pool containing the reactor coolant. Emergency Core Cooling Systems pump coolant directly into the reactor vessel.

In terms of core margin. A PWR operates at higher pressures and temperatures and is noit designed for any boiling (ONB or onset of nucleate boiling is bad for a PWR.

A BWR operates at saturation pressure and is intended to boil. (No bubbles no dollars). The BWR is concerned with dryout conditions or departure from nucleate boiling (DNB).

Other differences include PWR use of soluble boron for reactivity control during normal operation, control rods on top for PWRs and below for BWRs. And many more... But they have in common that the safety systems must control temperature, pressure, and reactivity to protect the public.

Beyond that we can argue, as designers and physicists have for years, as to which is better or worse, simpler or more complex, riskier or less risky, expensive or cheaper. But for now, that is a nutshell version as I see it. That is not a simple question with a two paragraph answer.
 
  • #3
NUCENG said:
...
In terms of core margin. A PWR operates at higher pressures and temperatures and is noit designed for any boiling (ONB or onset of nucleate boiling is bad for a PWR...

There is some amount of nucleate boiling during operation of a PWR, and it's not necessarily bad. It is the departure from nucleate boiling that leads to increased fuel and clad temperatures in a PWR, just as in a BWR.

... That is not a simple question with a two paragraph answer.

You got that right, NUCENG.

To the OP, you may wish to read through the US NRC General Design Criteria (available on the NRC website, look for Regulations -- 10CFR50 -- Appendix A). The GDCs can give you a pretty good idea of what is required from the safety systems. Most of the GDCs are applicable to both BWRs and PWRs.
 

What is the purpose of safety engineering features?

Safety engineering features are designed and implemented to prevent or reduce the risk of accidents, injuries, or other safety hazards in a particular system or environment. These features aim to protect individuals, property, and the environment.

What are some examples of safety engineering features?

Some examples of safety engineering features include safety switches, emergency stop buttons, warning labels, safety guards, and fail-safe mechanisms. These features can be found in various systems, such as machinery, vehicles, buildings, and workplaces.

How are safety engineering features tested and evaluated?

Safety engineering features are tested and evaluated through various methods, such as risk assessment, hazard analysis, and safety audits. These processes help identify potential hazards and assess the effectiveness of safety features in mitigating those hazards.

Why is it important to regularly maintain safety engineering features?

Regular maintenance of safety engineering features is crucial to ensure their continued effectiveness. Over time, these features can become worn, damaged, or malfunction, which can compromise their ability to protect against safety hazards. Regular maintenance helps identify and address any issues before they become a potential risk.

What role do safety engineering features play in the design process?

Safety engineering features are an essential consideration in the design process of any system or product. They are incorporated into the design to ensure that safety hazards are identified and addressed from the initial stages. This helps prevent costly and potentially dangerous modifications later on in the process.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Back
Top