Constraint Forces and Conservation of energy

In summary, the conversation discusses the equation of motion for a particle constrained to move on a surface and the assumption that the constraint force N is always perpendicular to the surface. This assumption is motivated by calculational convenience, but it also has a physical interpretation of energy conservation. The question is raised whether energy conservation is possible without this assumption. The distinction between normal force N and ground reaction force R is also mentioned, with the conservation of energy only being valid if R=N.
  • #1
tut_einstein
31
0
Suppose you are trying the solve the equation of motion of say a particle constrained to move on a surface f(x[itex]\vec{}[/itex],t)=0. The equation of motion is:

mx[itex]\ddot{}[/itex] = F[itex]\vec{}[/itex] + N[itex]\vec{}[/itex], where F is an known external force and N is the unknown constraint force.

Now, when you assume that N always perpendicular to the surface, all classical mechanics books motivate that assumption by saying that it's for calculational convenience because N can in principle have any component parallel to the surface without violating the constraint. So, we just get rid of that degree of freedom by saying N = [itex]\lambda[/itex](t) *grad(f), where lambda is an arbitrary lagrange multiplier. this also let's us solve for four unknowns using four equations.
However, we also know that the assumption that N is always perpenidcular to the surface has a physical interpretation that energy is always conserved if F is derivable from a time independent potential and the surface doesn't have any explicit time dependence.

My question is whether it is possible to have energy conservation without assuming N is always perpendicular to the surface. Or did the assumption just happened to correspond to what actually happens?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
tut_einstein said:
My question is whether it is possible to have energy conservation without assuming N is always perpendicular to the surface. Or did the assumption just happened to correspond to what actually happens?

I'm not so sure what you mean exactly because apparently N is the normal force but then you are adding it in x-direction(if by x you mean horizontal line) . I also think you must differentiate between what you mean by normal force N and ground reaction force R. Ground reaction force R is the sum of normal force N and friction f which is tangent to the moving surface. Therefore, N and f are just components of R in y and x directions (or n and t directions etc).

The conservation energy is valid only if the sum of the works done by non-conservative forces like friction is zero. That means if R≠N conservation of energy is not working. For it to work we must have R=N. That is, work done by friction is zero.
 

1. What are constraint forces?

Constraint forces are forces that act on a system to restrict its motion or movement in a particular way. They are often present in systems where there are physical constraints, such as a pendulum swinging back and forth or a car turning around a corner.

2. How do constraint forces affect the conservation of energy?

Constraint forces do not affect the conservation of energy in a system. This is because they do not do any work on the system, so they do not add or remove energy from the system. The total energy of a system remains constant, even with the presence of constraint forces.

3. Can constraint forces be conservative?

Yes, constraint forces can be conservative. A conservative force is one that does not depend on the path taken by an object, but only on its initial and final positions. Constraint forces that act along a fixed path, such as gravity, are often conservative.

4. How do constraint forces relate to Newton's third law of motion?

Constraint forces obey Newton's third law of motion, which states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. This means that when a constraint force acts on an object, the object exerts an equal and opposite force on the constraint.

5. Can the work done by constraint forces be calculated?

No, the work done by constraint forces cannot be calculated. This is because constraint forces do not cause any displacement, so the work done is zero. Therefore, the concept of work does not apply to constraint forces.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
735
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
610
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
824
Replies
4
Views
998
Back
Top