Real Analysis vs Differential Geometry vs Topology

In summary: Can you even take differential geometry without having taken topology? I thought that was generally required especially if its a grad class.I thought Einsteins idea was to translate physics into differential geometry. analysis and topology are more like foundational underpinnings for differential geometry.
  • #1
Howers
447
5
I would just like to know which of these math courses is best suited for physics. I have taken advanced calculus and linear algebra, so I've seen most of the proofs one typically sees in an intro analysis course (ie. epsilon delta etc.). I intend to do work with a lot of Quantum Field Theory, and maybe try out general relativity (though not to specialize in it, just to see why its not comptable with qm). I don't intend to study string theory, atleast not as part of my work. I'll also mostly be dealing with macroscopic, e&m, and perhaps stat mech.

I am sure all three are beautiful math subjects, and I independently intend to learn all of them. But for practical reasons, I can only choose to study one. I heard diff geometry is used often and not just in GR. I have rarely heard analysis or topology being applied to physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
All three are important. Both Real Analysis and Differential Geometry lead to Topology. If you can, take all three: RA teaches about point-set topology, measure theory and integration, metric spaces and Hilbert (&Banach) spaces, and ...; DG is, in many respects, GR without the physics, and Topology is about the structure of spaces -- including those used in current physics research.

Talk to your professors, and fellow students. Are the teachers good ones? Do the courses help with physics, or are they geared toward math students. Find out all you can before making any decisions. Good luck.

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
  • #3
The answer is definitely Differential Geometry, especially when you want to do QFT, where it is widely used. It will also give you much insight in other subjects (apart from the obvious GR), like classical mechanics, electrodynamics, advanced QM,... it's everywhere.

Real analysis might be also useful, but it depends on what exactly is in the syllabus. Measure and integration theory aren't that interesting for physicist, but theory of Banach and Hilbert spaces, spectral theory and distributions are frequently used, not only in QM.

I wouldn't consider topology, if you're not planning to do string theory.
 
  • #4
Can you even take differential geometry without having taken topology? I thought that was generally required especially if its a grad class.
 
  • #5
I thought Einsteins idea was to translate physics into differential geometry. analysis and topology are more like foundational underpinnings for differential geometry.

so i would take the diff geom and learn whatever analysis and topology are needed to understand it.

as spivak says in his great differential geometry book, when he discusses pde, "and now a word from our sponsor".
 
  • #6
Vid said:
Can you even take differential geometry without having taken topology? I thought that was generally required especially if its a grad class.

Elementary diff geometry. Nothing higher than R^3. I am going to be a junior.
 
  • #7
This thread has made me reconsider what I plan on doing as far as math courses go. I'm a freshman Physics major and I plan on minoring in math, and there are several "tracks" I can go down to pursue this. Right now what I'm most interested in doing in grad school is plasma physics, but that can change of course. Currently I'm on the Geometry and Topology track, but I haven't taken any classes towards it yet so I can still change.

The classes I need to take for Geometry and Topology are Diff. Geometry, Intro Topology, and Intro Algebraic Topology (along with 3 other 3000+ level classes, one of which would have to be Analysis 1 because the Topology classes require it).

Would I be better served by doing the Differentials and Dynamics track, where I'd end up taking Partial Diff Eq 1 and 2, and Dynamics and Bifurcations 1, along with 3 other classes. Should I do something like Partial Diff Eq 1 and 2, Dynamics and Bifurcations 1, and then maybe an undergrad and grad level Diff Geo. class with 1 other class (Hilbert Spaces maybe?). Would Analysis still be useful?
 
  • #8
I am no expert but it seems that Differentials and Dynamics would be better suited to plasmsa physics. That being said thouh, could you do the Differentials and Dynamics track and use your three elective classes to take Analysis 1, Intro to Topology and Diff. Geo?
 
  • #9
r4nd0m said:
The answer is definitely Differential Geometry, especially when you want to do QFT, where it is widely used. It will also give you much insight in other subjects (apart from the obvious GR), like classical mechanics, electrodynamics, advanced QM,... it's everywhere.

Real analysis might be also useful, but it depends on what exactly is in the syllabus. Measure and integration theory aren't that interesting for physicist, but theory of Banach and Hilbert spaces, spectral theory and distributions are frequently used, not only in QM.

I wouldn't consider topology, if you're not planning to do string theory.

I was unaware that QFT used Differential Geometry. Could you explain when it pops in?
 
  • #10
reilly said:
All three are important. Both Real Analysis and Differential Geometry lead to Topology. If you can, take all three: RA teaches about point-set topology, measure theory and integration, metric spaces and Hilbert (&Banach) spaces, and ...; DG is, in many respects, GR without the physics, and Topology is about the structure of spaces -- including those used in current physics research.

Talk to your professors, and fellow students. Are the teachers good ones? Do the courses help with physics, or are they geared toward math students. Find out all you can before making any decisions. Good luck.

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
I don't think it should matter to him if it's geared to mathmemticians or physicists, I think it will be best if it were geared to maths grads, cause you need to first grasp the definitions and theorems especially if for example the topology course is your first.
usually maths courses taught by physicists lack rigour and without rigour you don't really undersatnd what's going on there, and you cannot really appreciate the applications.
 
  • #11
mgiddy911 said:
I am no expert but it seems that Differentials and Dynamics would be better suited to plasmsa physics. That being said thouh, could you do the Differentials and Dynamics track and use your three elective classes to take Analysis 1, Intro to Topology and Diff. Geo?

Yup, I could do that. Thanks for the advice.
 
  • #12
Real Analysis especially Functional Analysis is what you want to study for quantum mechanics. Luckily this will give you intuition to study topology which will give you the necessary back ground for manifold theory. To me it really depends on what kind of courses you are talking about. If you have the ability to take a graduate level course in Real Analysis (measure theory and/or functional analysis) then I would say do that. But, if you are taking about functions of a single real variable verses a course on differential geometry in R^3 (both undergrad courses), then I would say differential geometry will be the most beneficial. I don't understand why topology would be desirable (unless you mean topology at a very high level) unless you need it to talk about measures on locally compact topological spaces or advanced manifold theory (which I think a half a year or a year of topology at the graduate level would be enough for those topics).
 
  • #13
Howers said:
Elementary diff geometry. Nothing higher than R^3. I am going to be a junior.

I would take that then and audit a course on functional analysis.
 
  • #14
eastside00_99 said:
I would take that then and audit a course on functional analysis.
Given his background, a course in functional analysis might as well be taught in Klingon.

To the OP, personally, I think you ought to take the analysis course. If you're going to be doing anything quantum, you'll need functional analysis at some point; so you'll need intro analysis (i.e. baby rudin) as well as measure theory and some Lp space theory before you get there.

I think that undergraduate differential geometry courses are a waste of time; it's multivariable calculus, that's all. I understand the importance of building intuition, but it doesn't even prepare you for the difficult part of differential geometry.
 
  • #15
Again, when do L^p spaces pop up in QM? I'm very curious.
 
  • #16
quasar987 said:
Again, when do L^p spaces pop up in QM? I'm very curious.

It comes up when you talk about Fourier transformations of Lebesgue-Integrable functions. The question is which functions have Fourier transformations and which functions are a Fourier transformation of function. You need to carefully discuss L^1 and L^2. But, also your states are elements of L[tex] $ ^2(-\infty,+\infty)$ [/tex], and your operators--position, momentum, and observables--are from some domain to L[tex] $^2(-\infty,+\infty)$ [/tex]. So, knowing some facts such as L^P completeness or L^P continuity, et cetera, et cetera would help.

I think an audit is entirely reasonable if you have time, but I wouldn't expect to get too much into QM in the class. Rather, that is something you will have to do on your own with functional analysis.
 
Last edited:

1. What is the difference between Real Analysis, Differential Geometry, and Topology?

Real Analysis is a branch of mathematics that deals with the study of real numbers, functions, and their properties. It focuses on the rigorous understanding of limits, continuity, derivatives, and integrals. Differential Geometry is a field that applies the tools of calculus to the study of curves and surfaces in higher dimensions. It also includes the study of manifolds and their properties. Topology is a branch of mathematics that studies the properties of spaces that are preserved under continuous transformations, such as stretching and bending, without tearing or gluing.

2. How are Real Analysis, Differential Geometry, and Topology related?

Real Analysis, Differential Geometry, and Topology are all branches of mathematics that deal with the study of spaces and their properties. They use different tools and methods to approach the same concepts, and often have overlapping areas of study. Real Analysis provides the foundations for Differential Geometry and Topology, while Differential Geometry and Topology often use concepts from Real Analysis in their proofs and definitions.

3. What are some real-world applications of Real Analysis, Differential Geometry, and Topology?

Real Analysis has applications in physics, engineering, and economics, as it provides the mathematical foundations for understanding and modeling continuous systems. Differential Geometry has applications in fields such as computer graphics, robotics, and general relativity, as it allows for the mathematical description of curves and surfaces in higher dimensions. Topology has applications in areas such as data analysis, network theory, and materials science, as it provides tools for understanding the shape and structure of complex systems.

4. What are the main differences between Real Analysis and Differential Geometry?

The main difference between Real Analysis and Differential Geometry is their focus and approach. Real Analysis primarily deals with the properties of real numbers and functions, while Differential Geometry focuses on the study of curves, surfaces, and manifolds in higher dimensions. Real Analysis uses tools such as limits, derivatives, and integrals, while Differential Geometry uses concepts from linear algebra and differential equations to understand the geometric properties of spaces.

5. How does Topology differ from Real Analysis and Differential Geometry?

Topology differs from Real Analysis and Differential Geometry in that it does not rely on the concept of distance or measurement. Instead, it focuses on the properties of spaces that are preserved under continuous transformations, such as stretching and bending. Topology also has a more abstract and general approach, as it studies the topological properties of spaces without considering their specific geometric properties. Real Analysis and Differential Geometry, on the other hand, have a more concrete and specific focus on the properties of real numbers and geometric objects.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
12
Views
774
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
14
Views
554
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
809
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
693
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
235
Back
Top