Destructive Interference and the Conservation of Energy

In summary: The law of conservation of energy tells us that the energy in a system will not change no matter what. In this case, the energy is in the fields of light, so even if the beams are completely destructive, the energy will still be there.
  • #1
Rattus_norveg
6
0
This is a question concerning the wave nature of light and the conservation of energy.

Consider a prism that combines two sources of monochromatic, coherent (laser) light into one beam. The sources are adjusted so that the laser beams combine in phase resulting in constructive interference. So, the resultant beam has the same wavelength as the parent beams but it's electric and magnetic vectors have twice the amplitude.

Now consider the same setup but with the one parent beam adjusted so that the beams combine 180 degrees out of phase, resulting in 100 percent destructive interference. The electric field vector of the first beam exactly cancels the electric field vector of the second beam and vice versa; the same is true for the magnetic field vector.

It seems that at this point, with the two light beams perfectly combined 180 degrees out of phase that the resultant beam of light is effectively obliterated. If so, where does the energy go? How is the law of conservation of energy maintained when considering this system?
 

Attachments

  • light interference 01.png
    light interference 01.png
    15.6 KB · Views: 804
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
You asssume that the light has only one way out
In fact,the light beams can be reflected at the surface
Once the refracted light is canceled out,the reflected light will be strengthened.
 
  • #3
Sorry if this seems nit picky but the optical arrangement shown will not bend both beams through 90 degrees and bring them together.
 
  • #4
I do not believe that this image is an accurate representation. The two beams of light are internally reflecting off of different surfaces, so they are not spatially colocated. Therefore, they cannot exhibit complete destructive interference. I think this is also what Dadface noticed.
 
  • #5
Don't take the drawing too literally, the whole question is meant as a thought experiment. Here I'm assuming that there is some optical arrangement that would blend the two beams. It is probably not possible to create optics to blend the beams perfectly in real life.
 
  • #6
Hmm, why would two (different) beams give interference? I thought each quantum only interferes with itself. Is it a boson thing?
 
  • #7
Rattus_norveg said:
Here I'm assuming that there is some optical arrangement that would blend the two beams. It is probably not possible to create optics to blend the beams perfectly in real life.
That is correct, you can get destructive interference in some places and constructive interference in others, but energy is conserved overall. You can also, of course, have interactions with matter where energy is transferred between the fields and matter, but again energy is conserved overall.
 

1. What is destructive interference?

Destructive interference occurs when two waves with opposite amplitudes and the same frequency overlap and cancel each other out. This results in a decrease in the overall amplitude, or intensity, of the resulting wave.

2. How does destructive interference relate to the conservation of energy?

Destructive interference is a manifestation of the law of conservation of energy. When two waves interfere destructively, the energy of the resulting wave is equal to the sum of the energies of the two original waves. This means that no energy is lost in the process.

3. Can destructive interference occur with any type of wave?

Yes, destructive interference can occur with any type of wave, including sound waves, light waves, and water waves. As long as two waves with opposite amplitudes and the same frequency overlap, they can interfere destructively.

4. How does the distance between two interfering waves affect the level of destructive interference?

The level of destructive interference is directly proportional to the distance between the two interfering waves. The farther apart the waves are, the less likely they are to overlap and cancel each other out completely.

5. Is destructive interference always a bad thing?

Not necessarily. In some cases, destructive interference can be useful, such as in noise-cancelling headphones. By producing a wave with an opposite amplitude to the ambient noise, destructive interference can cancel out the noise and improve the overall sound quality.

Similar threads

Replies
54
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
53
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
632
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top