(just got up )
ah i see
yes, the earth has a surprisingly high electric field
, which various sources give as between 130 and 170 V/m (N/C)
a vertical rod will therefore have a tiny charge at the end
from a 1974 "scientific america" article by c l strong (http://www.only1egg-productions.org/...tic_motors.htm
The field exists in the atmosphere between the earth's surface and the ionosphere as an electric potential of about 360,000 volts.
The energy of the field can be tapped with a simple antenna in the form of a vertical wire that carries one sharp point or more at its upper end. During fair weather the antenna will pick up potential at the rate of about 100 volts for each meter of height between the points and the earth's surface up to a few hundred feet. At higher altitudes the rate decreases. During local thunderstorms the pickup can amount to thousands of volts per foot.
Why not tap the field to supplement conventional energy resources? Several limitations must first be overcome. For example, a single sharp point can draw electric current from the surrounding air at a rate of only about a millionth of an ampere. An antenna consisting of a single point at the top of a 60-foot wire could be expected to deliver about a microampere at 2,000 volts; the rate is equivalent to .002 watt. A point-studded balloon tethered by a wire at an altitude of 75 meters might be expected to deliver .075 watt. A serious limitation appears as the altitude of the antenna exceeds about 200 meters. The correspondingly higher voltages become difficult to confine.
yes the rod is a conductor
, so (in equilibrium) the charge in the rod rearranges itself (on the surface) so as to cancel out the external (earth's) electric field inside
this rearrangement only requires a few electrons at the end of the rod (and the power involved is so small that we don't notice it)
the whole interior of the rod is then at the same potential, and the field immediately outside the rod is slightly distorted by the rearranged charge on the rod