Finding stress in non symetric cross section

In summary, we discussed the effects of changing radius in a given shaft with a circular cross section. It was found that the cross section with the smallest radius will experience the largest stress. We also looked at finding the angle of twist at the end of the shaft using the equation T/(GJ)*dx. If the bottom of the shaft is reinforced to 2t, we can use the equation T/(2A*t) to find the largest shear stress felt in the shaft. This involves finding the area surrounded by an axis through the center of the side of the shape. The advantages of thickening parts of the shaft were also discussed, with potential benefits including improved performance in bending and possibly increased maximum moment that can be applied. However,
  • #1
Dell
590
0
in a given shaft with a circular cross section, the radius changes linearly
Capture.JPG


find the maximum shear stress

i used T*r/J
and since J is dependant on r^4, i found that the cross section with the smallest radius will feel the largest stress.

find the angle of twist at the end of the shaft

T/(GJ)*dx while J is a function of X and i integrate from 0 to L

if the bottom of the shaft is reinforced, -thickened- to 2t, what is the largest shear stress felt in the shaft??
Captu?re.JPG


up till now i have only solved questions with either circular/ rectangular closed cross sections, or other open cross sections

can i use the equation for maximum stress
T/(2A*t)

where A is the area surrounded by an axis through the center of the side of the shape?? if so how do i do this ? what would that axis look like? would it be 2 half circles with 90 degree joints? meaning the area would be pi/2*(R12+R22) where R1 and R2 are the average radii of the 2 half circles??

using this logic i would find the maximum stress in the thin walled circle

is this correct? can i do this?

this is where i am stumped,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
also what are the advantages of thickening parts of the shaft, i think if it was subjected to bending this might improve its performance as far as max moment that can be applied, but in torsion what would this do? there any other advantagees?
 
  • #3
please help

I would first like to applaud your efforts in using equations and seeking out a solution to this problem. It is clear that you have a good understanding of the concepts involved.

To answer your question, yes, you can use the equation for maximum stress (T/(2A*t)) in this scenario. However, the axis through the center of the side of the shape would not be a half circle, but rather a straight line connecting the two ends of the reinforced section. This is because the cross section is now non-symmetric, and the radius changes linearly, so the shape would not be a perfect circle.

To find the maximum stress, you would need to calculate the area (A) and the thickness (t) of the reinforced section. The area will be the sum of the areas of the two half circles (pi/2*(R1^2+R2^2)) plus the area of the straight section (2t*l), where l is the length of the reinforced section. The thickness (t) will simply be 2t.

Once you have these values, you can plug them into the equation (T/(2A*t)) to find the maximum stress felt in the reinforced section. This will give you a more accurate result than using the previous equation (T*r/J), as it takes into account the change in cross section.

As for finding the angle of twist at the end of the shaft, you can still use the equation T/(GJ)*dx, but you will need to integrate from 0 to the length of the reinforced section (l) and then add that to the angle of twist for the remaining section of the shaft (which you can calculate using the previous equation).

I hope this helps to clarify the process for finding the maximum stress and angle of twist in a non-symmetric cross section. Keep up the good work in your scientific endeavors!
 

1. What is a non-symmetric cross section?

A non-symmetric cross section is a shape or profile that does not have equal dimensions or symmetry across its axis. This means that the left and right sides of the cross section are not identical.

2. How does non-symmetry affect stress in a cross section?

Non-symmetry can affect stress in a cross section by causing uneven distribution of forces and moments. This can result in higher stress concentrations in certain areas of the cross section.

3. Why is it important to find stress in a non-symmetric cross section?

It is important to find stress in a non-symmetric cross section because it can help engineers and designers understand the potential weak points in a structure and make necessary modifications to ensure its structural integrity.

4. What methods can be used to find stress in non-symmetric cross sections?

There are several methods that can be used to find stress in non-symmetric cross sections, such as analytical methods, numerical methods using finite element analysis, and experimental methods using strain gauges and other testing techniques.

5. Are there any design considerations for non-symmetric cross sections?

Yes, there are several design considerations for non-symmetric cross sections. These include ensuring a balanced distribution of forces and moments, minimizing stress concentrations, and considering the material properties and loading conditions in the design process.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
222
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top