UV disinfection in water treatment

In summary, the UV disinfection unit will need an intensity of 410 J/m.sq to comply with WHO guidelines. To calculate the necessary lamp intensity, the user will need to account for the flow velocity and the water quality.
  • #1
Civilwaters
3
0
I am designing a UV disinfection unit
think: http://www.wedeco.com.au/www.australianultraviolet.com.au/animation2.gif [Broken]

I need to ensure an internal intensity/dose of 410 J/m.sq to all waters that pass though. (to comply with WHO guidelines)

I am aware of The Beer-Lambert Law but will have no data on absorption apart from turbidity in NTU's. Is there any conversion or link up?

The textbooks I have looked at have the photon output and as such energy within the tank but not intensity. (they are dealing with oxidation of chemicals and not inactivation of cells)

Any recommendations (ideas, online reading etc)

or am I just going to have to over design with a intensity sensor on the outer casing and power control system.
(humm going to need at least an ball park idea to do the over design)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Civilwaters said:
I am designing a UV disinfection unit
think: http://www.wedeco.com.au/www.australianultraviolet.com.au/animation2.gif [Broken]

I need to ensure an internal intensity/dose of 410 J/m.sq to all waters that pass though. (to comply with WHO guidelines)

I am aware of The Beer-Lambert Law but will have no data on absorption apart from turbidity in NTU's. Is there any conversion or link up?

The textbooks I have looked at have the photon output and as such energy within the tank but not intensity. (they are dealing with oxidation of chemicals and not inactivation of cells)

Any recommendations (ideas, online reading etc)

or am I just going to have to over design with a intensity sensor on the outer casing and power control system.
(humm going to need at least an ball park idea to do the over design)

The Beer-Lambert Law may get you the answer you seek, provided that you know some things about the water that will be passing through the filter. Most importantly, will the particulate matter have been filtered out before the water passes through? If not, you will have to account for scattering as well. That is also doable, but it complicates things a bit. Other important factors are the expected concentrations of organic molecules and metal ions, both of which can have significant absorptions at UV wavelengths. As usual, the more you know about the expected composition of your sample (i.e. the water), the better.

If your water is filtered, and you know the max concentrations of absorbing species, then you can easily calculate the fraction of emitted light that reaches the inner radius of your flow tube from the Beer-Lambert Law. A few unit conversions should get you a ball-park estimate of the lamp intensity that you are going to need (you will need to account for the flow velocity as well).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
"you will have to account for scattering as well. That is also doable,"

I am going to assume that not all partials have been filtered out
so, how do I account for scattering?
 
  • #4
Civilwaters said:
I am designing a UV disinfection unit
think: http://www.wedeco.com.au/www.australianultraviolet.com.au/animation2.gif [Broken]

I need to ensure an internal intensity/dose of 410 J/m.sq to all waters that pass though. (to comply with WHO guidelines)

<snip>

Since your standard is energy/area, I am thinking you also have a requirement for 'dwell time', or how long the water is exposed to the output. Energy = power/time, and power is pretty much given by the intensity- there are some subtle radiometric issues, but the bulb manufacturer should have an irradiance specification that you can put to use.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Andy Resnick said:
Since your standard is energy/area, I am thinking you also have a requirement for 'dwell time', or how long the water is exposed to the output. Energy = power/time, and power is pretty much given by the intensity- there are some subtle radiometric issues, but the bulb manufacturer should have an irradiance specification that you can put to use.


yeah of course,
however I was planning to do it the other way round i.e. getting different standard bulbs and seeing what flow I could get passed them. By finding the time needed in the chamber and the distance is the length of the bulb.

The problem is more insuring the intensity with differing water quality at the edges of the chamber.


e.g.
A GL30 outputs 13.4W UVC
(http://www.globalmarket.com/product/Shot-wave--Ultraviolet--Germicidal-Lamp_25047.html [Broken])
(its a crap bulb I just Googled it for real data)

Its 25.5mm dia so call it 30mm with a water proof sleeve and 893mm long (ouch that's long for 13W, anyway) so call it 800mm of useful length (taking off the caps)

and I'll make the chamber 200mm dia (internal surface of outer casing)

get it all into SI units

P=13W
L=0.8m
Dia=0.2m
therefore

(pie *D)*L= Area= 0.50 m.sq

so the outer surface (in a vacuum !) gets: power/Area= 25.86 J.s/m.sq

and 410/25.86=15.85 sec in the chamber
0.8m/15.85=0.05 m/s flow velocity

(area-area of bulb) *0.05m/s = volume of flow

approx 2L/s


But anyway that's the easy stuff
going back to
"so the outer surface (in a vacuum !) gets: power/Area= 25.86 J.s/m.sq"

its not in a vacuum and will be adsorbed along the way
and the beer's law refers to molar concentrations that I have no data (other then the aforementioned NTU values)

So I suppose a better question is where can i get info on adsorption in cloudy substances
because for an over design I could assume that only a small percentage reaches the outer surface and then follow though the eqn's.

I just need an idea and like I said I'll use a sensor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
Unfortunately, water turbidity measurements do not use simple units. You may find some useful information here

http://www.optek.com/Turbidity_Measurement_Units.asp [Broken]
http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/characteristics.html#Turbidity

and here

http://water.usgs.gov/owq/FieldManual/Chapter6/6.7_contents.html

I could not find a clear conversion between "optical density" and NTU.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
Civilwaters said:
"you will have to account for scattering as well. That is also doable,"

I am going to assume that not all partials have been filtered out
so, how do I account for scattering?

Like I said, it gets more complicated. I was going to write up a little on Mie scattering here, but I see that you already have NTU ratings for the water sample. I am not an expert in the field, but those are a measure of perpendicular scattering due to turbidity, and thus it should be possible to convert them into some sort of parallel form for transmission. If you look up some references on nephelometry, you may be able to find this information.

However, the rated specifications for drinking water have rather low NTU ratings (well less than 1), so you may find that the losses from scattering are negligible. If you are dealing with significantly more turbid samples, then you may have to address this in more detail. Regarding absorption, at the wavelengths of the bulb (~250 nm), water has a non-zero absorption cross-section, but the total attenuation is only around a percent or two for a 10 cm path length (based on quick interpolation from wikipedia spectral data ... you should check this). Again, assuming this is drinking water, then total concentrations of UV-absorptive materials should be small, but this can be measured (see below).

So, I think your approach of buying the cheapo-bulb and using a sensor to measure the transmitted power directly is the best option. My guess (but it is only a guess) from the info you have provided is that the scattering/absorption effects will be fairly minor. One thing that would be nice to have before jumping in is an UV-absorption spectrum of a sample of your water at the wavelength of interest ... this may be tricky to get, because many UV-absorption instruments only go down to 300 nm (if that far). However, if you are at a college or university, you may get lucky. That will allow you to measure the absorbance of your sample for a known path-length, so it will be trivial to extrapolate out to your actual distance of interest. (Note that this measurement will also account for the scattering effects, since all light that doesn't make it to the detector will be attributed to absorbance.)
 

1. How does UV disinfection work in water treatment?

UV disinfection in water treatment involves the use of ultraviolet light to neutralize harmful microorganisms, such as bacteria and viruses, in water. The UV light damages the DNA of these microorganisms, preventing them from reproducing and making them unable to cause infections or diseases.

2. Is UV disinfection effective against all types of microorganisms?

While UV disinfection is highly effective against a wide range of microorganisms, it may not be effective against all types. Some viruses and bacteria may have a protective coating that makes them resistant to UV light. It is important to consult with a water treatment expert to determine if UV disinfection is the best option for your specific water source.

3. Does UV disinfection change the taste or smell of water?

No, UV disinfection does not alter the taste or smell of water. Unlike chemical disinfection methods, UV treatment does not add any chemicals or produce any by-products that can affect the taste or odor of water. It simply uses light to neutralize microorganisms, leaving the water with its natural taste and smell.

4. What are the advantages of using UV disinfection in water treatment?

There are several advantages to using UV disinfection in water treatment. Firstly, it is a chemical-free method, making it environmentally friendly and safe for human consumption. UV treatment also does not alter the pH or mineral content of water, unlike other disinfection methods. Additionally, it is a fast and efficient process, with no need for storage or contact time.

5. Are there any limitations to using UV disinfection in water treatment?

While UV disinfection is a highly effective method, it does have some limitations. It requires a power source to operate, so it may not be suitable for remote or off-grid locations. UV light also does not provide residual protection, meaning that microorganisms can re-contaminate the water after treatment if the system is not properly maintained. It is important to regularly monitor and maintain UV disinfection systems to ensure they are functioning properly.

Similar threads

  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top