- #1
snoopies622
- 840
- 28
I was looking into the geodesic equations for the Schwarzschild metric and I noticed a discrepancy between two sources: According to http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s5-05/5-05.htm (near the bottom) the second derivative of the azimuth angle is
[tex]
\frac {d^{2} \phi}{d \lambda ^2}=\frac {-2}{r} \frac {dr}{d \lambda} \frac {d \phi}{d \lambda}+ \frac {2}{tan (\theta )}\frac {d \theta}{d \lambda} \frac {d \phi}{d \lambda}
[/tex]
where [tex]\lambda[/tex] is something proportional to proper time [tex]\tau[/tex]. In Relativity Demystified (David McMahon, 2006 McGraw Hill, page 218) however, the corresponding equation has the second term negative instead of positive. (The other three equations match exactly.) I also have a copy of Lillian R. Lieber's The Einstein Theory of Relativity (Paul Dry Books, 2008) but in her version (p. 269) the second term is missing altogether.
I intend to try to derive these equations myself but I would like to know in advance what the correct versions are so when I'm done I can see if I made any mistakes. Does anyone happen to know which source is right?
[tex]
\frac {d^{2} \phi}{d \lambda ^2}=\frac {-2}{r} \frac {dr}{d \lambda} \frac {d \phi}{d \lambda}+ \frac {2}{tan (\theta )}\frac {d \theta}{d \lambda} \frac {d \phi}{d \lambda}
[/tex]
where [tex]\lambda[/tex] is something proportional to proper time [tex]\tau[/tex]. In Relativity Demystified (David McMahon, 2006 McGraw Hill, page 218) however, the corresponding equation has the second term negative instead of positive. (The other three equations match exactly.) I also have a copy of Lillian R. Lieber's The Einstein Theory of Relativity (Paul Dry Books, 2008) but in her version (p. 269) the second term is missing altogether.
I intend to try to derive these equations myself but I would like to know in advance what the correct versions are so when I'm done I can see if I made any mistakes. Does anyone happen to know which source is right?