New method of propulsion, or simple BS?

In summary, the conversation is about a link to a site that claims to have a new method of propulsion. The person posting is unsure about its legitimacy and asks for input from those knowledgeable in physics. Other users explain that similar sites are often just scams, and provide information about the actual physics behind the proposed method. They clarify that it is not anti-gravity and can only work in an atmosphere that can be ionized.
  • #1
wasteofo2
478
2
Someone on a guitar forum posted a link to this site, which supposedly outlines a new method of propulsion. I'm in high school and I haven't even taken physics yet, so I really am in no position to debunk this, but generally sites that look like that are just nonsense.

So, does anyone who knows their stuff have a reason why this stuff is all just garbage, like those eternal-life bracelets, or is this stuff actually legitimate and just made by a very poor web-designer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Many of the fad sites for the Biefeld-Brown effect try to sell it as about the physics of capaciters, but this wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biefeld-Brown_effect, tells you what is really going on: corona discharge. Yes you can lift small weights with it. No it isn't anti-gravity. It only works within an atmosphere that can be ionized (not in space, therefor).
 
  • #3


It's always important to approach any new information or claims with a critical eye, especially when it comes to scientific advancements. In this case, it's understandable that you may not have the knowledge or background to fully understand the information presented on the website. However, the fact that the website looks unprofessional and lacks credible sources or evidence to support its claims is a red flag.

It's always important to do thorough research and fact-checking before believing in something, especially when it comes to something as complex as a new method of propulsion. It's also worth noting that genuine scientific advancements typically go through a rigorous peer-review process and are published in reputable scientific journals, rather than being presented on a poorly designed website.

In conclusion, it's always best to approach these types of claims with skepticism and to seek out more reliable sources and evidence before coming to any conclusions. As a high school student, it's great that you're already questioning the legitimacy of this information and seeking out more informed opinions. Keep up the critical thinking and always be cautious of information that seems too good to be true.
 

1. What is the new method of propulsion and how does it work?

The new method of propulsion is a technology that uses a combination of electromagnetic and gravitational forces to generate thrust. This involves creating a strong electromagnetic field around the spacecraft and manipulating the gravitational pull of nearby celestial bodies to accelerate the spacecraft.

2. Is there any scientific evidence to support this new method of propulsion?

Yes, there have been numerous experiments and studies conducted by reputable scientists that have shown promising results for this new method of propulsion. However, further research and testing are still needed to fully validate its effectiveness.

3. How does this new method of propulsion compare to traditional methods?

This new method of propulsion has the potential to be more efficient and cost-effective compared to traditional chemical propulsion methods. It also has the advantage of being able to continuously accelerate without the need for refueling.

4. Are there any potential drawbacks or limitations to this new method of propulsion?

As with any new technology, there are still some unknowns and potential limitations that need to be addressed. For example, the effects of prolonged exposure to electromagnetic fields on living organisms and the potential impact on celestial bodies need to be studied.

5. When can we expect to see this new method of propulsion being used in practical applications?

It is difficult to predict an exact timeline, as further research and development are still needed. However, with the growing interest and potential benefits of this technology, it is likely that we will see practical applications within the next decade.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
684
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
670
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
884
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
877
Back
Top