Is possible to build an optical trap with non-laser light?

In summary: Well, if you're trying to trap a particle with a round shape, it's helpful to have a laser that emits a monochromatic beam. Secondly, it might help to use a shorter laser pulse, so the light is more tightly focused on the particle. Finally, you might want to try using a different type of illumination- perhaps a LED instead of a projector.Thanks, Simon and Andy!
  • #1
Hecktor
2
0
Optical traps for refractive colloidal particles (latex) of around 1 micron always employ a laser ligth tipically of 30 mW or even less. I have never seen a report of an optical trap using a non-laser light source. I wonder if is possible to build a non-laser light optical trap and if not why. I suspect the reason is coherence of laser light but it does not seem enough reason (though coherence is an elusive concept for me).
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF;
It would be useful to wrap your head around the properties of laser light before trying to nut out this stuff. You will find it a lot more understandable.

Optical traps need very directional light, with a very carefully controlled wavelength ... I suppose, in principle, you could use any old light source... but you would only be able to use a very small percentage of it (you could put a spherical source at the focal point of a converging lens, and then through a collimeter and a bunch of filters) making such a setup uneconomical.
 
  • #3
Hecktor said:
Optical traps for refractive colloidal particles (latex) of around 1 micron always employ a laser ligth tipically of 30 mW or even less. I have never seen a report of an optical trap using a non-laser light source. I wonder if is possible to build a non-laser light optical trap and if not why. I suspect the reason is coherence of laser light but it does not seem enough reason (though coherence is an elusive concept for me).

I suppose you could, but there are several advantages to using a laser. Primarily, lasers are *bright* and approximately a point source- trying to accomplish the same optical coupling even with an arc lamp will be very difficult and rather pointless. There are bright LEDs on the market that could potentially be used- but it's not clear what the advantage is, since laser diodes are so easy to use and cheap.

Also, laser output is generally very stable in intensity, the start-up time is short, and the device lifetime is long. Finally, because the laser output is fairly monochromatic, it's easy to direct the light to the objective without interfering with imaging- either your eye or a CCD.
 
  • #4
Thank Simon and Andy for your answers but let me explain a little bit more my goal.
I understand laser light is monochromatic, collimated and coherent and at least some of these properties are desirable for a good optical trap, however I have some reasons to pursue in my objective.

I need to build an optical trap with a non-trivial circular shape, e. g. a trap with triangular shape. I fitted a standard DLP projector at the rear of an optical microscope (such that the projector uses the microscope optical path for fluorescence illumination). With the aid of few lenses I can transfer the image from the projector into the microscope sample plane so when you look through the eyepiece you can see simultaneously the sample and the projector image projected onto it. The advantage of this over a laser set up is that I can simple draw a slide in power point with whatever shape e. g. a triangle and that shape will have my optical trap. However the trap is not working. When I project an image over a brownian particle the particle is not trapped by the light.
I know there is a device with mobile mirrors which move very fast forming dynamic shapes with laser light but I don't have this, I have the DLP projector.

In my opinion light power is not an issue because the projector lamp is above 200 W. Even considering no perfect eficiency and power losses during light concentration there should be still enough light power at the sample plane. The projector can produce decent monochromatic light though I don't think this is a major reason for fail.
My question is what would you do in order to have the trap working or at least to improve the chances of success?
 
  • #5


I can confirm that it is possible to build an optical trap using non-laser light. In fact, there have been several studies and reports on the use of non-laser light sources such as LEDs, halogen lamps, and even sunlight for optical trapping.

The reason why lasers are commonly used for optical trapping is due to their high intensity and coherence. Coherence refers to the ability of a light source to maintain a constant phase relationship between its waves, which is crucial for the formation of stable optical traps. Non-laser light sources usually have lower coherence, which can make it challenging to create a stable trap for small particles.

However, with advancements in technology and the development of new materials, it is now possible to build optical traps using non-laser light sources. These traps may not be as strong or stable as those created with lasers, but they can still be effective for trapping larger particles.

In conclusion, while lasers are the preferred light source for optical trapping, it is possible to build an optical trap using non-laser light. The choice of light source will depend on the specific application and the size of the particles being trapped.
 

1. What is an optical trap?

An optical trap, also known as an optical tweezer, is a scientific instrument that uses laser light to trap and manipulate microscopic objects, such as cells or nanoparticles. The laser light creates a focused beam that produces a strong electric field, which can hold and move the trapped object.

2. Can an optical trap be built with non-laser light?

Yes, it is possible to build an optical trap with non-laser light. Recent advancements in technology have led to the development of alternative trapping methods, such as using holographic optical elements, liquid crystal films, or even standard light bulbs, to create optical traps without the use of lasers.

3. What are the advantages of using non-laser light for optical trapping?

There are several advantages to using non-laser light for optical trapping. Non-laser light sources are more affordable and easier to obtain compared to lasers, making them more accessible for researchers. Additionally, non-laser light sources can have a broader range of wavelengths, allowing for more flexibility in trapping different types of particles.

4. Are there any limitations to using non-laser light for optical trapping?

Although non-laser light can be used for optical trapping, there are some limitations. One limitation is that non-laser light sources typically have lower power and intensity compared to lasers, which can make it more challenging to trap smaller particles. Another limitation is that non-laser light may not have the same level of precision and control as laser light when it comes to manipulating the trapped object.

5. How can non-laser optical traps be used in scientific research?

Non-laser optical traps have various applications in scientific research. They are commonly used in biophysics and nanotechnology to study and manipulate microscopic particles, such as cells or nanoparticles. Non-laser optical traps have also been used in optofluidic devices for chemical and biological analysis, as well as in the development of new materials for advanced technologies.

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Optics
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
788
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top