Proving Linear Filtering of Gaussian Process Still Gaussian

In summary, a Gaussian process is a function that follows the definition of a Gaussian random variable and remains Gaussian after being linearly filtered. Proving this statement is quite technical, but it can be understood intuitively by discretising the integral and showing that the resulting variables are jointly Gaussian. However, it is not a simple task to formally prove this theorem and it falls into the category of being easily understood but not easily proven.
  • #1
chingkui
181
2
How to prove the output of Linear Filtering a Gaussian Process is still Gaussian? It has been stated in many books I read, but none of them actually prove it. One even stated that "The technical mechinery to prove this property is beyond the scope of this book..."
By definition, a Gaussian process is a function x such that for any finite integer k, and for any arbitary time t1, t2, ..., tk, that x(t1), x(t2), ..., x(tk) are jointly Gaussian RV.
To linear filter the process x(t) means just to convolute it with a function h(t), i.e., the output y(t)=h(t)*x(t)=integrate(h(t-s)x(s)ds)
To prove the statement is to prove that for any m>0, and any time t1,..., tm, that y(t1),...,y(tm) are jointly Gaussian.
Is it that difficult to prove? What does one need to prove it?
It is quite obvious that a Gaussian RV remains Gaussian after linear filtering it, but for a Gaussian process, I am not sure what to use to prove that. Does anyone know how? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I suspect that the a formal proof will be quite technical. However, to understand it intuitively, one may try to discretise the integral in the definition of y(t). The decretised integral is a linear combination of jointly Gaussian variables, and is therefore Gaussian. Each of the y(ti) can be discretised this way, and each is a linear combination of a set of jointly Gaussian variables, and {y(ti)} is therefore jointly Gaussian.

Of course this is far from being a proof. But I think this theorem belongs to the category where it can be easily understood but not easily proved.
 
  • #3


Proving that the output of linear filtering a Gaussian process is still Gaussian requires a deep understanding of mathematical concepts and techniques such as probability theory, stochastic processes, and linear algebra. It is not a trivial task and may require advanced mathematical knowledge.

To prove this statement, one would need to use the properties of Gaussian processes, such as the definition of a Gaussian process and its covariance function. Additionally, one would need to use the properties of linear filtering, such as the convolution operation and its properties.

The proof would involve showing that the output of the linear filtering operation, which is the convolution of the Gaussian process with a function h(t), is also a Gaussian process. This can be done by showing that the output satisfies the definition of a Gaussian process, which states that any finite number of points in the process should be jointly Gaussian.

To do this, one would need to use techniques such as moment generating functions, characteristic functions, and the properties of Gaussian distributions. The proof may also involve using properties of integrals and limits to show that the output of the convolution operation is still Gaussian.

Overall, proving that the output of linear filtering a Gaussian process is still Gaussian is a complex task that requires a deep understanding of mathematical concepts and techniques. It is not something that can be easily explained or proved without a strong mathematical background. Therefore, it is understandable that many books may state this property without providing a proof.
 

1. What is a Gaussian process?

A Gaussian process is a stochastic process that is defined by a collection of random variables, any finite number of which have a joint Gaussian distribution. It is often used in statistical modeling and machine learning to represent a distribution over functions.

2. What is linear filtering of a Gaussian process?

Linear filtering of a Gaussian process is the process of applying a linear transformation to a Gaussian process. This can be done by convolving the Gaussian process with a linear filter, which results in a new Gaussian process with modified mean and covariance functions.

3. How is it possible to prove that a linear filtering of a Gaussian process is still Gaussian?

This can be proven mathematically by showing that the resulting mean and covariance functions of the filtered Gaussian process satisfy the properties of a Gaussian distribution. This involves using the properties of Gaussian processes and linear filtering operations.

4. What are the implications of proving that a linear filtering of a Gaussian process is still Gaussian?

Proving this means that the resulting filtered Gaussian process will also have a Gaussian distribution, which has many desirable properties for statistical modeling and machine learning. This allows for the use of efficient algorithms and methods that are specific to Gaussian processes.

5. Can this proof be applied to other types of processes besides Gaussian processes?

No, the proof specifically applies to Gaussian processes because they have the property of being closed under linear transformations. This means that the result of a linear transformation on a Gaussian process will also be a Gaussian process. Other types of processes may not have this property and therefore cannot be proven to still be Gaussian after linear filtering.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
681
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
2
Views
713
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
29
Views
3K
Back
Top