| New Reply |
Nordheim-Fuchs Model |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jan1-13, 12:08 PM | #1 |
|
|
Nordheim-Fuchs Model
I am looking at the equations for maximum flux/power and energy deposited from the power pulse with reactivity increase >1$ in the Nordheim-Fuchs Model:
P=[itex]\frac{\Lambda \omega^{2}}{2\alpha_{FT}K}[/itex] E=[itex]\frac{2(\rho-\beta)}{K\alpha_{FT}}[/itex] With a negative temperature coefficient (\alpha_{FT}), shouldn't the above equations be negative? I've looked at other examples that include reactors with a negative temp coefficient, and they all produce a positive value (they don't show the calculations, just the graphs). It seems like that just ignore the negative sign, but I want to know why. |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Nordheim-Fuchs Model
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Fowler-nordheim tunneling | Quantum Physics | 1 | ||
| Probability of specular reflection in Fuchs theory for copper | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 0 | ||
| Range of Nordheim parameter y | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 0 | ||
| Fowler Nordheim Tunnelling - Plz Help | Quantum Physics | 6 | ||
| Chris Fuchs Comments on Quantum Crypto | Quantum Physics | 3 | ||