Motivating Matrix Addition/Multiplication Without Appealing to Linear Maps

In summary, the defs/formulas for the sum, multiplication of matrices respectively, are often motivated by the fact that matrix addition models the point-wise addition of linear maps. If A,B are linear maps described on the same basis, then the sum (a_ij)+(b_ij) describes the linear operator: A(x)+B(x)
  • #1
Bacle
662
1
Hi, Everyone:

In linear algebra courses, the defs/formulas for
the sum, multiplication of matrices respectively,
are often motivated by the fact that matrix addition
models the point-wise addition of linear maps, i.e.,
If A,B are linear maps described on the same basis, then
the sum (a_ij)+(b_ij) describes the linear operator:

(A+B)(x)=A(x)+B(x)

And AB models the composition of the operators A,B;
i.e., A*B(x) =A( B(x)).

Now, I am teaching a class in which matrices have,
so far, been used only to represent systems of linear
equations. Does anyone know how to motivate the
definitions A+B and AB from this or a related
perspective?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


You could use the same basic ideas expressed as equations.

If Ax = p and Bx = q, then (A+B)x = (p + q)
If Ax = y and By = z, then BAx = z

The addition example seems a bit artificial, but most students will probably "buy" matrix addition by analogy with scalar addition.

The multiplication example is (fortunately) more realistic. You can invent "word problems" where two sets of equations can be combined and solved this way.
 
  • #3


The addition is not that artificial - you rewrite some of the equations in the linear system - then add/subtract from your original system to get a simplification.
 
  • #4


I'll write the number 2 as 02, and 3 as 03 etc.. just to make things look pretty on this page.

I think you could begin by explaining how the matrix on the left comes from considering that
system of equations on the right. You could motivate the definition by explaining how a
matrix is an abstract representation of that system of equations first.

|01 02 03 04| - 01x + 02y + 03z + 04w
|05 06 07 08| - 05x + 06y + 07z + 08w
|09 10 11 12| - 09x + 10y + 11z + 12w
|13 14 15 16| - 13x + 14y + 15z + 16w

You get the idea, the - on every line is typographical...Then explain that an equation like 01x + 02y + 03z + 04w could be perceived as coming
from adding two different equations as follows:

_00x + 01y + 01z + 02w
+01x + 01y + 02z + 02w
------------------------
(00 + 01)x + (01 + 01)y + (01 + 02)z + (02 + 02)w

so

(00 + 01)x + (01 + 01)y + (01 + 02)z + (02 + 02)w = 01x + 02y + 03z + 04w.

We can rewrite the whole system in this way:

|(00 + 01) (01 + 01) (01 + 02) (02 + 02)| - (00 + 01)x + (01 + 01)y + (01 + 02)z + (02 + 02)w
|(03 + 02) (03 + 02) (03 + 04) (04 + 04)| - (03 + 02)x + (03 + 03)y + (03 + 04)z + (04 + 04)w

I won't do all four as you get the idea.

So we have

|01 02 03 04| = |(00 + 01) (01 + 01) (01 + 02) (02 + 02)| = |00 01 01 02| + |01 01 02 02|
|05 06 07 08| = |(03 + 02) (03 + 02) (03 + 04) (04 + 04)| = |03 03 03 04| + |02 03 04 04|

and you can see that the definition of matrix addition follows. Obviously the last equality
should be approached starting from the perspective of two systems of equations where
you just show they have the same solution and show that there's no reason not to define
things this way because everything has the same solution set...

As for matrix multiplication that's a big question, you might enjoy reading my thread here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=451822
as I tried to figure this question out and eventually got a few separate and equally
satisfying answers. From post 6 on is where I wrote the ideas, the early posts are just
me being confused.
 
  • #5


As a fellow scientist and educator, I understand the importance of motivating mathematical concepts in a way that is relevant and applicable to students. While it may seem that the motivation for matrix addition and multiplication lies solely in the context of linear maps, there are other ways to approach these operations without relying on this concept.

One way to motivate matrix addition and multiplication is to think about them in terms of transformations. Matrices can be thought of as tools for transforming vectors, and adding or multiplying matrices results in a new transformation. This can be visualized by considering the effect of adding or multiplying a matrix on a set of points in the plane. For example, adding two matrices would result in a new transformation that combines the individual transformations of the original matrices.

Another perspective to consider is the idea of combining and scaling. Matrix addition can be seen as a way to combine two matrices and their corresponding transformations, while multiplication can be thought of as scaling or stretching the original transformation. This can be demonstrated by using specific examples and showing how the resulting matrix affects the points in a transformation.

Additionally, matrix addition and multiplication can also be motivated by considering the properties they possess, such as commutativity and associativity. These properties can be illustrated through examples and students can be challenged to find patterns and connections between them.

Overall, while the concept of linear maps may provide a useful context for understanding matrix addition and multiplication, it is not the only way to approach these operations. By exploring different perspectives and connecting them to real-world applications, students can develop a deeper understanding and appreciation for these fundamental concepts in linear algebra.
 

1. What is the motivation behind studying matrix addition and multiplication without using linear maps?

The motivation behind this study is to better understand the fundamental properties of matrix operations and their applications in various fields such as physics, engineering, and computer science. By removing the reliance on linear maps, we can develop a more abstract and general understanding of matrices, allowing for more flexible and powerful applications.

2. How do matrix addition and multiplication differ when linear maps are not used?

Without using linear maps, matrix addition and multiplication can still be defined and computed, but the resulting operations may not have the same properties as those defined using linear maps. For example, matrix multiplication may not be associative or have an identity element.

3. Can we still use matrix operations to solve systems of linear equations without relying on linear maps?

Yes, we can still use matrix operations to solve systems of linear equations without using linear maps. However, we may need to develop new methods or algorithms to do so, as the traditional methods that rely on linear maps may not be applicable in this context.

4. Are there any real-world applications for matrix addition and multiplication without appealing to linear maps?

Yes, there are several real-world applications for this type of study. For example, in computer graphics and animation, matrices are often used to represent transformations such as scaling, rotation, and translation. By understanding matrix operations without relying on linear maps, we can develop more sophisticated and efficient algorithms for these applications.

5. What are some potential challenges or limitations when studying matrix addition and multiplication without linear maps?

One potential challenge is that the resulting operations may not have the same intuitive properties as those defined using linear maps, making it more difficult to apply them in practical situations. Additionally, developing new methods and algorithms for solving systems of linear equations without linear maps may require significant time and resources.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
25
Views
967
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
3
Replies
84
Views
8K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
69
Views
3K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
2
Replies
57
Views
3K
Back
Top