Solving Inequalities with Fraction Denominators: A Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter inverse
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses solving rational inequalities and the method of solving for equality and using the fact that the rational function is continuous, except where the denominator is zero. The conversation also addresses a specific problem and its solution, as well as clarifying the direction of the inequality when multiplying by a negative number.
  • #1
inverse
26
0
Hello!

a)[itex]\frac{1}{2}<\frac{5}{3x+42}<\frac{3}{2}[/itex]

b)[itex]\frac{1}{2}<\frac{3x+1}{3x+4}<\frac{3}{2}[/itex]

c)[itex]\frac{1}{2}<\frac{3x+1}{3x+4}<\frac{2}{3}[/itex]

Can you tell me how I can resolve it?

In c), x must be less than 1/2 for the inequality is fulfilled, so I now x<1/2,

but when I pass 2x-1 to multipliy with 1 "(3<1·2x-1)" Why I have not change "<" by ">" The denominator is negative, when is negative I thought I had change it.

The solution set is [itex](-\infty,\frac{1}{2})\cup(2,+\infty)[/itex]
for x> 2 not to have to change the sign to move the denominator to multiply by 1.

Thank you very much for your help :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If x<-4/3 then (3x+1)/(3x+4) is always greater than one. When x=0, (3x+1)/(3x+4)=1/4. When x=infinity, (3x+1)/(3x+4)=1. There's some region, while x is positive, that the expression is within your region of interest.
 
  • #3


inverse said:
Hello!

a)[itex]\frac{1}{2}<\frac{5}{3x+42}<\frac{3}{2}[/itex]

b)[itex]\frac{1}{2}<\frac{3x+1}{3x+4}<\frac{3}{2}[/itex]

c)[itex]\frac{1}{2}<\frac{3x+1}{3x+4}<\frac{2}{3}[/itex]

Can you tell me how I can resolve it?

In c), x must be less than 1/2 for the inequality is fulfilled, so I now x<1/2,

but when I pass 2x-1 to multiply with 1 "(3<1·2x-1)" Why I have not change "<" by ">" The denominator is negative, when is negative I thought I had change it.

The solution set is [itex](-\infty,\frac{1}{2})\cup(2,+\infty)[/itex]
for x> 2 not to have to change the sign to move the denominator to multiply by 1.

Thank you very much for your help :)
What method have you been taught to solve rational inequalities?

I like to solve for equality & then use the fact that the rational function is continuous, except where the denominator is zero. Solving for equality eliminates the need to separate into cases depending upon the sign of the denominator.

Look at (c): [itex]\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}<\frac{3x+1}{3x+4}<\frac{2}{3}[/itex]

Solve: [itex]\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}=\frac{3x+1}{3x+4}[/itex]

[itex]3x+4=6x+2[/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle x=\frac{2}{3}[/itex]

Solve: [itex]\displaystyle \frac{3x+1}{3x+4}=\frac{2}{3}[/itex]

[itex]9x+3=6x+8[/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle x=\frac{5}{3}[/itex]​

Check easy to use numbers: one to the left of 2/3 one between 2/3 & 5/3 and one to the right of 5/3 . Which of these fulfill the inequality?
 
  • #4
Oh I see, [itex]\frac{2}{3}<x<\frac{5}{3}[/itex]

Can you help me with a and b?

Thank you
 
  • #5
inverse said:
Oh I see, [itex]\frac{2}{3}<x<\frac{5}{3}[/itex]

Can you help me with a and b?

Thank you
Can you follow the method I used for part (c) ?

Post your efforts for (a) & (b).

(There are other methods, of course!)

Is there a typo in your posted expression for (a)?

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}<\frac{5}{3x+42}<\frac{3}{2}[/itex]

or

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}<\frac{5}{3x+4}<\frac{3}{2}[/itex]
 
  • #6
Sorry, c) is [itex]\frac{3}{2x-1}<1[/itex]

So I know that x must be less than 1/2 for which the inequality. In the denominator of 3/2x-1 "I superimpose" if x takes values ​​(-infinity, 1/2) x is negative, thus passing the denominator to multiply with 1 if you change the "<" by "> ".
Then 3> 2x-1, 4> 2x and 2> x

Why is x>2? and not 2>x, What am I doing wrong?
 
  • #7
inverse said:
Sorry, c) is [itex]\frac{3}{2x-1}<1[/itex]

So I know that x must be less than 1/2 for which the inequality. In the denominator of 3/2x-1 "I superimpose" if x takes values ​​(-infinity, 1/2) x is negative, thus passing the denominator to multiply with 1 if you change the "<" by "> ".
Then 3> 2x-1, 4> 2x and 2> x

Why is x>2? and not 2>x, What am I doing wrong?
Multiplying an inequality by a negative number reverses the direction of the inequality.


If x < 1/2, then 3/(2x-1) is negative, so it's definitely less than 1.

What if [itex]\displaystyle 2x-1>0\ \text{ i.e. }\ x>\frac{1}{2}\ ?[/itex]

Then multiplying [itex]\displaystyle \frac{3}{2x-1}<1[/itex] by (2x-1) gives:

[itex]\displaystyle 3< 2x-1[/itex]

Solving for x gives: [itex]\displaystyle x>\frac{3}{2}\ .[/itex]

Put the two answers together.
 
  • #8
I already understand c), but I still don't understand a) and b)
 
  • #9
Is there a typo in your posted expression for (a)?

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}<\frac{5}{3x+42}<\frac{3}{2}[/itex]

or

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}<\frac{5}{3x+4}<\frac{3}{2}[/itex]

or

something else?
 
  • #10
not only this, but I already know to solve this, thanks anyway
 

1. What are inequalities with fraction denominators?

Inequalities with fraction denominators are mathematical expressions that contain fractions and inequality symbols, such as >, <, ≥, ≤, etc. These expressions involve comparing two quantities and determining whether one is greater than, less than, or equal to the other.

2. Why is it important to be able to solve inequalities with fraction denominators?

Being able to solve inequalities with fraction denominators is important because they can represent real-life situations, such as budgeting, rates, and proportions. Understanding how to solve these types of inequalities can help in making informed decisions and solving practical problems.

3. What are the steps to solve inequalities with fraction denominators?

The steps to solve inequalities with fraction denominators are:

  1. Distribute the denominator to both sides of the inequality
  2. Multiply both sides by the reciprocal of the fraction
  3. Simplify the resulting expression
  4. Isolate the variable on one side of the inequality sign
  5. Check the solution by plugging it back into the original inequality

4. Are there any special considerations when solving inequalities with fraction denominators?

Yes, there are a few special considerations when solving inequalities with fraction denominators:

  • If the fraction has a negative sign, be sure to distribute it to both the numerator and denominator
  • If the inequality symbol is or , flip the direction of the inequality when multiplying by a negative number
  • If the inequality involves , solve it as two separate inequalities

5. Can you provide an example of solving an inequality with a fraction denominator?

Of course! Let's solve the inequality 2/3x + 5 > 2:

Step 1: Distribute the denominator:

2/3x + 5 > 2 becomes (2/3)x + 5 > 2

Step 2: Multiply by the reciprocal of the fraction:

(2/3)x + 5 > 2 becomes x + 15/3 > 4/3

Step 3: Simplify:

x + 15/3 > 4/3 becomes x + 5 > 4/3

Step 4: Isolate the variable:

x + 5 > 4/3 becomes x > 4/3 - 5, which simplifies to x > -11/3

Step 5: Check the solution:

Plugging x = -11/3 back into the original inequality gives (2/3)(-11/3) + 5 > 2, which simplifies to -22/9 + 5 > 2, or 23/9 > 2, which is true. Therefore, x = -11/3 is a valid solution.

Similar threads

  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
603
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
937
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
938
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
853
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
794
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top