Electrostatic Force question

In summary: And don't worry... you are being a great help to me...thank you for all of your patience!Okay i have x1 = 0, y1 = .405x2 = .72, y2 = 0so, (.405^2 + .72^2)^.5 = .81 N = the magnitude of the two chargestan^-1 (.405/.72) = 29.4so, the direction is 29.4 degrees below the -x axis?Thanks so much for your
  • #1
itsagulati
15
0

Homework Statement


Three charges are fixed to an x, y coordinate system. A charge of +18 µC is on the y-axis at y = +3.0 m. A charge of -16 µC is at the origin. Lastly, a charge of +45 µC is on the x-axis at x = +3.0 m. Determine the magnitude and direction of the net electrostatic force on the charge at x = +3.0 m. Specify the direction relative to the -x axis.

Homework Equations



F = k*q1*q2 / r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



9e9 * 18e-6 * 16e-6 / 3^2 = .28768 N

and

9e9 * 45e-6 * 16e-6 / 3^2 = .7192N

(.29^2 + .72^2)^.5 = .7746N

tan^-1 ( .29/.72) = 21.8 degrees...90 - 22 = 68 degrees below the x-axis

Can anyone figure out where I am going wrong? I don't get what i am not seeing.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
(.29^2 + .72^2)^.5 = .7746N

This is wrong for calculating the net force... first find the net x-component of the force acting on the charge (so add the two components due to each charge)... then find the net y-component (only one charge needs to be considered here since the charge on the x-axis only contributes an x-component)...

Then use the pythogrean theorem...
 
  • #3
If they are straight on the x-axis just out 3.0m and the other one straight up on the y-axis just up 3.0 m...then doesn't that make them 90 degree angles? meaning no x component on the charge on the y-axis and then for the charge on the x-axis there is no y component?

So, just a charge 3.0 m out at 0 degrees and one 3.0m up at 90 degrees?
Thus only the .29 and .72 (clearly it is wrong, but i am not getting how to calculate otherwise).

Thanks!
 
  • #4
itsagulati said:
If they are straight on the x-axis just out 3.0m and the other one straight up on the y-axis just up 3.0 m...then doesn't that make them 90 degree angles? meaning no x component on the charge on the y-axis and then for the charge on the x-axis there is no y component?

So, just a charge 3.0 m out at 0 degrees and one 3.0m up at 90 degrees?
Thus only the .29 and .72 (clearly it is wrong, but i am not getting how to calculate otherwise).

Thanks!

The charge at (0,3) exerts both an x and y component on the charge at (3,0)...

The question is asking for the force on the charge at (3,0)... not the force on the charge at (0,0)
 
  • #5
Ok so i was just not htinking in vectors...but here is what i have (i only have one more chance at this before it is due so i am trying to be cautious).

K * 18e-6 * 16e-6 / 9 = .288 = y comp1
K* 18e-6*45e-6/9 = .81 = x comp1

K*45e-6*18e-6/9 = .81 = y comp 2
K*45e-6*16e-6/9 = .72 = x comp2

x1 + x2 = 1.53N
y1+y2 = 1.098 N

(1.098^2 + 1.53^2)^.5 = 1.88N

THEN for the angle i am doing tan^-1 (1.098/1.53) = 35.66 degrees and relative to the -x axis that is -35.66 degrees if you draw the line to extend back through the origin and into quadrant 3?

And thanks for all of your help so far :)
It is definitely helping me past the road blocks!
 
  • #6
You're making a common mistake calculating the components... Please look at post #22 in this thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=181577&highlight=learningphysics+rootx&page=2

Also, I'm confused as to why you have a calculation for a force between the 18muC and -16muC charges... you only need the force on the 45muC charge...

The force that the -16muC charge exerts on the 45muC charge is 0.72N in the -x direction... or -0.72 in the x direction... that part is right.

Now you need to calculate the x and y components of the charge by the 18muC on the 45muC after looking at the post in the thread I linked...

First calculate the net force of the 18muC on the 45muC. Then calculate the x component and y component.
 
  • #7
ok...it asks for: kq / x^2+y^2 * cos @ (where @ = theta).

only thing i can think of is 45 degrees...so:

kq / x^2 + y^2 * cos (45) = ((9e9 * 16e-6) / (3^2))* cos (45) + ((9e9 * 18e-6) / (3^2))* cos (45)?

(currently working on this...i realize i forgot the x and y component part of the problem)
 
Last edited:
  • #8
No, the x^2 + y^2 is in the denominator...

What is the net force of the 18muC on the 45muC... what is r? what is r^2?
 
  • #9
bleh. sorry the problems are getting jumbled in my head...

F = 9e9 * 45e-6 * 18e-6 / 9 = .81 N
and we already determined .72 N

So, now i calculate the x and y component?

i get: x1 = 0, y1 = .81
x2 = .72, y2 = 0

pyth. theo. => (.81^2+.72^2)^.5 = 1.08N?
 
  • #10
itsagulati said:
bleh. sorry the problems are getting jumbled in my head...

F = 9e9 * 45e-6 * 18e-6 / 9 = .81 N

Why do you have 9 in the denominator?
 
  • #11
God i don't get this problem...

i got all the starred, double starred, etc. problems...and this no star basic arse problem i just am not getting. Why on Earth is this one so hard for me LOL

F***
 
Last edited:
  • #12
9 in the denominator is from 3^2 as r^2

the only other thing i have come up with is since it is the repulsive force...then 3 sqrt(2) so 18 in the denominator giving me .405

.405 and .72 are my two sides then?
 
  • #13
itsagulati said:
9 in the denominator is from 3^2 as r^2

the only other thing i have come up with is since it is the repulsive force...then 3 sqrt(2) so 18 in the denominator giving me .405

Yes, it should be 18 in the denominator... I'm not understanding why you say "since it is the repulsive force"... whether it was attractive or repulsive... the distance is 3sqrt(2) hence r^2 = 18... Hope I don't seem like a jerk... just want to make sure you understand this part. :smile:

.405 and .72 are my two sides then?

No wait... 0.405 N is the net force exerted by the charge at (0,3) on the charge at (3,0)... that's right... now what is the x-component of this force... and what's the y-component of this force...
 

What is electrostatic force?

Electrostatic force is a fundamental force of nature that describes the attraction or repulsion between particles with electric charge.

What is the difference between electrostatic force and gravitational force?

The main difference is that electrostatic force only applies to particles with electric charge, while gravitational force applies to all particles with mass.

How is electrostatic force calculated?

Electrostatic force is calculated using Coulomb's law, which states that the force between two charged particles is directly proportional to the product of their charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

What are some examples of electrostatic force in everyday life?

Some examples include static electricity, lightning, and the attraction between clothes in a dryer. Electrostatic force is also responsible for holding atoms and molecules together.

Can electrostatic force be shielded or blocked?

Yes, electrostatic force can be shielded or blocked by using materials that conduct electricity, such as metal. This prevents the transfer of electric charge between objects.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
788
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
976
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
729
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
802
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top