Magnetic Field Strength: Inverse Proportionality to Square or Cube?

In summary, the strength of a magnetic field is dependent on the distance from the source and can be described as either a "monopole" field, which goes like 1/r^2, or a "dipole" field, which goes like 1/r^3. The type of field depends on the source and how close you are to it. The threshold for treating a dipole field as a monopole varies and is determined by the purpose for which the magnet is being used.
  • #1
magnetics
47
0
I have read a number of journal article that state that magnetic field strength diminishes inversely proportional to the square of the distance. BUT more than one has stated that the field strength is inversely proportional to the cube of the distance from the surface of the magnet.
Which one is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


It depends on the source of the field and how close you are to it.

A "monopole" field goes like [itex]1/r^2[/itex]. Magnetic monopoles don't actually exist as far as we know to date, but some situations can produce a field which is approximately a monopole field over a limited region. For example, if you have a long bar magnet and you stay close to one pole.

A "dipole" field goes like [itex]1/r^3[/itex]. This is what you get from a current loop or a bar magnet, when you get far enough away that it appears "small."
 
  • #4


Thank you jtbell, that makes a lot of sense now. Could you possibly point me to a reference book/article that defines this?

Also in practical terms for a permanent magnet, say rare Earth with Max. Energy Product of 40MGOe how long would it have to be before it's capable of taking on the properties of a monopole at each end?
 
  • #5


dont forget about the magnetic field of a single electron moving through empty space
 
  • #6


magnetics said:
Thank you jtbell, that makes a lot of sense now. Could you possibly point me to a reference book/article that defines this?

Also in practical terms for a permanent magnet, say rare Earth with Max. Energy Product of 40MGOe how long would it have to be before it's capable of taking on the properties of a monopole at each end?

That tends to be a matter of practical application. To be treated as a monopole, one need only be so close to one pole that the effects from the opposite pole are "negligable." Where that threshold lies is up to the individual and usually dictated by the purpose for which the magnet is being used or examined.
 

1. What is magnetic field strength?

Magnetic field strength refers to the intensity of the magnetic field at a particular point in space. It is measured in units of tesla (T) or gauss (G), and represents the force that a magnetic field exerts on a moving charged particle.

2. How is magnetic field strength related to distance?

Magnetic field strength follows an inverse square or inverse cube relationship with distance, meaning that as the distance from the source of the magnetic field increases, the strength of the magnetic field decreases proportionally to the square or cube of the distance.

3. What factors affect magnetic field strength?

The factors that affect magnetic field strength include the strength of the magnetic source, the distance from the source, and the presence of any intervening materials that may alter the magnetic field.

4. Why is magnetic field strength inversely proportional to distance squared or cubed?

This relationship is due to the way that magnetic fields spread out as they travel from the source. As the distance from the source increases, the same amount of magnetic flux is distributed over a larger area, resulting in a weaker magnetic field strength.

5. How is magnetic field strength measured?

Magnetic field strength is typically measured using a magnetometer, which detects the force exerted by a magnetic field on a test object. The units of measurement can vary depending on the specific application, but are commonly measured in tesla or gauss.

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
3K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
364
  • Electromagnetism
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
978
  • Electromagnetism
6
Replies
198
Views
9K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
683
Back
Top