Mass of trapped photons vs. Mass of potential energy

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of photons adding mass to an object, and a hypothetical system that could change its mass by trapping photons. It is explained that the total mass of the system remains the same, but there is a mass deficit due to the tighter binding of the two masses after the photons are trapped.
  • #1
cephron
124
0
I've understood for a while that a black hole is made more massive simply by shining light on it; the energy of the photons "goes towards" (for lack of a more informed/accurate term) the mass of the black hole. Also, a couple weeks back, someone on the forums said that if one had a container lined with perfect mirrors, then photons trapped inside the container would effectively add mass to the object. If this is true, then it occurred to me that a system could conceivably change its mass by sequestering photons within itself.

Imagine the following system: two heavy masses, at rest relative to each other, are held apart by a scaffold of some kind. The scaffold has a track which will allow the masses to fall towards each other, driving an electricity generator as they go. The generator is hooked up to a lamp which shines into a really, really long perfect-mirror-container, with another perfect mirror ready to slide down in front of the lamp (to close the container). Let's say the total mass of all the components of the system is M.

When this contraption is triggered, the masses fall towards each other, the lamp shines, and the mirror snaps shut before the light returns from the far end of the container. We now have the same system, with none of its particles missing, except now we also have a perfect-mirror-container full of photons.

Is the total mass of the system still M? Or is it slightly more? If the mass is the same, then where did the mass of the trapped photons "live" before they were generated?

Thanks in advance for any input / explanation / humbling rebuke.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Still M. The energy that made the photons came from the gravity field itself. The net far-field gravity is the same though the two masses have a quadupole moment that would be different for the box of photons.
 
  • #3
cephron said:
Imagine the following system: two heavy masses, at rest relative to each other, are held apart by a scaffold of some kind. The scaffold has a track which will allow the masses to fall towards each other, driving an electricity generator as they go. The generator is hooked up to a lamp which shines into a really, really long perfect-mirror-container, with another perfect mirror ready to slide down in front of the lamp (to close the container). Let's say the total mass of all the components of the system is M.

When this contraption is triggered, the masses fall towards each other, the lamp shines, and the mirror snaps shut before the light returns from the far end of the container. We now have the same system, with none of its particles missing, except now we also have a perfect-mirror-container full of photons.

Is the total mass of the system still M? Or is it slightly more? If the mass is the same, then where did the mass of the trapped photons "live" before they were generated?
The mass is the same. You should read the wikipedia article on binding energy, particularly the section on mass deficit. In this case the two masses are a more tightly bound system afterwards, so there is a mass deficit in the system. Assuming 100% efficiency everywhere that mass deficit is exactly equal to the mass gain from the photons.
 

What is the difference between mass of trapped photons and mass of potential energy?

The mass of trapped photons refers to the mass of photons that are confined within a certain space, such as in a black hole or within a cavity. This mass is a result of the energy of the photons, as described by Einstein's famous equation E=mc^2. On the other hand, the mass of potential energy refers to the mass that is associated with the potential energy of an object, which is determined by its position in a gravitational field.

Do photons have mass?

Photons are considered to be massless particles in the standard model of particle physics. This means that they have no rest mass, but they do have energy and momentum. However, in certain situations, such as when trapped within a confined space, photons can exhibit a behavior similar to mass, which is known as effective mass.

How does the mass of trapped photons affect the behavior of black holes?

The mass of trapped photons is a significant factor in the formation and behavior of black holes. As photons are pulled towards the singularity of a black hole, their mass contributes to the overall mass of the black hole. This mass, along with the mass of any other matter that falls into the black hole, determines its gravitational pull and the effects it has on its surrounding environment.

Can mass be converted into potential energy?

According to the law of conservation of energy, mass and energy are interchangeable. This means that mass can be converted into potential energy, and vice versa, through processes such as nuclear reactions or gravitational interactions. However, this conversion is subject to certain physical laws and principles, such as the conservation of momentum and the equivalence of mass and energy.

Does the mass of potential energy contribute to the total mass of an object?

Yes, the mass of potential energy does contribute to the total mass of an object. This is because potential energy is a form of energy, and according to Einstein's equation E=mc^2, energy and mass are equivalent. Therefore, an object with a higher potential energy will have a slightly higher mass than the same object with a lower potential energy.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
571
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
125
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
62
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
940
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
876
Replies
1
Views
237
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top