Alternative Techniques for Protein Detection and Quantification

  • Thread starter gravenewworld
  • Start date
In summary: However, this approach is superior to western. Western has fault rate upto 10% while MS has fault rate upto 0.1%.
  • #1
gravenewworld
1,132
26
Does anyone have any experience with assays or techniques that are alternative to a traditional western blot? Why hasn't the WB been made obsolete yet with technology in order to make protein detection and quantification much faster than and more repeatable than running an extremely long WB protocol that can go wrong at almost any step along the way? Are there any alternatives that are much faster but are just as widely accepted as a WB for protein detection?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #3
I looked into ELISA, is it just as good? Doesn't it have problems with false positives?
 
  • #4
Western blots are not hard.. what is the read-out that you're interested in? An ELISA is not that different from a Western blot, the draw-back of ELISA is that proteins are not separated. You must be sure that the antibodies used are specific and that you're not interested in protein modifications.
 
  • #5
Monique said:
Western blots are not hard.. what is the read-out that you're interested in? An ELISA is not that different from a Western blot, the draw-back of ELISA is that proteins are not separated. You must be sure that the antibodies used are specific and that you're not interested in protein modifications.

OK, the situation is this:
-I'm just after a single protein to see if it is present in certain types of cell lines. No worries about complexes etc. Just want to see if it is there, and if so, eventually figure out the amount.

-I've never done a WB before, know they are time consuming, and am afraid I'll mess it up and use expensive reagents in the first shot.

-Thought about doing ELISA, but the only antibodies I can find against the protein are polyclonal. Will they still work for the protein then? Polyclonals are less specific right?

-Would the polyclonals work for the WB?

Thanks for the replies thus far.
 
  • #6
What is the protein? If you don't mind saying.
 
  • #7
In that case you could do an immunostaining on your cells: fix the cells and stain. Do you know the specificity of your antibody? You need to be sure that it does not aspecifically stain proteins (take along some control that shouldn't stain).

I do Western blots regularly, it really is not difficult and I've never messed up one. There are pre-made gels that you can use, which saves time. It really is not time consuming, since you can do other stuff in between. Overall the procedure does take 1-2 days to complete.

You can check biocompare.com for an extensive list of antibodies and the assays they've been successfully used in. Also check the literature yourself for a particular antibody for optimized assay conditions. Antibodies that work in immunostaining don't always work in Western blot and vice versa.
 
  • #8
You can directly do ms of extracted proteins by top down approach in an MS directly without LC (Like MALDI-TOF) Specify a narrow mass rang covering your protein in the parameters to reduce load on MS.

This approach is superior to western. Western has fault rate upto 10% while MS has fault rtae of 0.1%. Its getting that purity for is hard in case a negative result is expected like in case of organellar purity experiments. But it can be used undoubtedly for protein detection however its just quantitative.
 
  • #9
gravenewworld said:
Does anyone have any experience with assays or techniques that are alternative to a traditional western blot? Why hasn't the WB been made obsolete yet with technology in order to make protein detection and quantification much faster than and more repeatable than running an extremely long WB protocol that can go wrong at almost any step along the way? Are there any alternatives that are much faster but are just as widely accepted as a WB for protein detection?

The most direct "new and improved" analogue to a traditional Western blot is a RIBA, right down to the familiar banding pattern. Purified synthetic antigens are precisely spotted on a strip before antibodies are allowed to react with them. No electrophoresis is involved unlike in WB, so the band spacing can be made completely uniform.

ELISAs and other related assays (IFAs, RIAs) are not really analogous to the WB in the way RIBA is. ELISAs can assay for a specific antigen-antibody reaction, and the specificity can be controlled by using different epitopes vs a single purified epitope, monoclonal vs polyclonal antibody, etc. But when you want to assay the reaction of an unknown antibody mixture to several different epitopes at the same time in a single reaction, then the only choices are a WB or a RIBA.

That answers your WB question, but as for protein detection methods in general, there's a whole lot else to say. Others have already addressed some aspects of this.
 
  • #10
saurabhgayali said:
You can directly do ms of extracted proteins by top down approach in an MS directly without LC (Like MALDI-TOF) Specify a narrow mass rang covering your protein in the parameters to reduce load on MS.

This approach is superior to western. Western has fault rate upto 10% while MS has fault rtae of 0.1%. Its getting that purity for is hard in case a negative result is expected like in case of organellar purity experiments. But it can be used undoubtedly for protein detection however its just quantitative.

We did look into MS, however, sensitivity was a possible issue, especially for proteins with low quantities. Antibody sensitivity is still several orders of magnitude better than routine MS techniques that are used AFAIK. We simply didn't want to have to grow a massive quantity of cells to be able to detect by MS.


Man how I would love to get my hands on an isntrument like this to try it for a trial run:

http://www.proteinsimple.com/simon.html


I'll have to look into RIBA, never heard of it.
 

What is a Western Blot?

A Western Blot is a laboratory technique used to detect and analyze specific proteins in a sample. It involves separating proteins by size using gel electrophoresis and then transferring them onto a membrane for detection with specific antibodies.

Why might someone look for an alternative to Western Blot?

Some reasons for seeking alternatives to Western Blot include cost, time, and difficulty in obtaining reliable results. Western Blot can also be technically challenging and may require specialized equipment and trained personnel.

What are some common Western Blot alternatives?

Some common alternatives to Western Blot include ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), immunohistochemistry, and mass spectrometry. Other techniques such as protein arrays and reverse-phase protein arrays are also gaining popularity.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of these alternatives?

One advantage of ELISA is its high sensitivity and specificity, but it can only detect one protein at a time. Immunohistochemistry allows for visualization of protein location within tissue samples, but it also has limitations in quantification. Mass spectrometry is highly sensitive and can identify multiple proteins simultaneously, but it is expensive and requires specialized training. Protein arrays and reverse-phase protein arrays have the potential for high-throughput analysis but may also have issues with reproducibility.

How do I choose the best alternative for my research?

The best alternative will depend on the specific research question and goals of the study. Factors to consider include the type and amount of sample available, the level of sensitivity and specificity needed, and the budget and resources available. It is important to thoroughly research and understand the advantages and limitations of each alternative before making a decision.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
4
Views
617
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
11
Views
494
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
14
Views
9K
Back
Top