New Reply

chemistry in the past

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Dec3-12, 05:26 PM   #1
 

chemistry in the past


Hello, how did chemists of the past know the weight of the elements to build up the periodic table without using new lab tecniques ?
Have they transformed all the elements in to gases and used Avogadro's law to obtain a relative atomic mass ? And how did they it was an element and not a compost ?

Thank you
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
chemistry news on PhysOrg.com

>> Attacking MRSA with metals from antibacterial clays
>> Femtosecond 'snapshots' reveal a dramatic bond tightening in photo-excited gold complexes
>> Beautiful 'flowers' self-assemble in a beaker
Dec3-12, 05:38 PM   #2
 
Admin
They used quality balances to measure weight, and a lot of guesswork.

Some composite substances were considered elements till they were proved to be not.
 
Dec4-12, 07:42 AM   #3
 
Quote by Borek View Post
They used quality balances to measure weight, and a lot of guesswork.
Yes but to compare atomic weight of two elements you must be sure you have the same number of particles in both elements, how did they solved this ?
 
Dec4-12, 08:05 AM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor

chemistry in the past


What exactly do you mean with "whithout using new lab techniques"?
 
Dec4-12, 03:17 PM   #5
 
withou the possibility to calculate the number of particles in a mole
 
Dec4-12, 03:46 PM   #6
 
Admin
You don't need that, equivalent masses are relative.
 
Dec4-12, 04:34 PM   #7
 
Quote by Borek View Post
You don't need that, equivalent masses are relative.
What do you mean?
If I take 1 g of Fe and 1g of S I can't calculate relative atomic weight because they don't contains the same quantity of atoms...
 
Dec4-12, 05:28 PM   #8
 
Admin
If you check how much Fe reacts with 1 g S you know ratio of their equivalent weights. This ratio is not some random number, but depends on the molar masses and valency of elements.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalent_(chemistry)
 
Dec4-12, 05:53 PM   #9
 
Dalton was the first to propose and publish a system of atomic weights.

Google "Dalton atomic weights" finds lots.

However he was right about some and wrong about other weights, as were those who followed immediately.

The story of how the correct values gradually unfolded is quite fascinating and well presented in the book

"Chasing the Molecule" by Julian Buckingham
 
Dec5-12, 01:56 AM   #10
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
You don't need to have vapours. You can also infer the ammount of moles e.g. from freezing point depression of solutions of salts, boiling point increase etc.
As others pointed out before, a lot can be learned from studying the mass proportions in different compounds.
 
Dec5-12, 09:21 AM   #11
 
Quote by DrDu View Post
You can also infer the ammount of moles e.g. from freezing point depression of solutions of salts, boiling point increase etc.
What are that ?
 
Dec5-12, 09:31 AM   #12
 
Admin
Quote by scientifico View Post
What are that ?
Have you tried to google them or do you expect to be spoon feed all the time?
 
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: chemistry in the past
Thread Forum Replies
Will a PhD in Theoretical Chemistry restrict my future post-doc to chemistry? Academic Guidance 1
Chemistry - Trying to name aromatic compounds and organic chemistry molecules Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 1
Chemistry in the Real World - Super Quick Question on chemistry/pools Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 1