- #1
oldman
- 633
- 5
De Sitter relativity and Lorentz contraction
I need help in understanding the elements of a paper that I think could turn out to be quite important, namely http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.2274 de Sitter Relativity: a New Road to Quantum Gravity
R. Aldrovandi, J. G. Pereira)
Inter aliathey say that:
in de Sitter relativity “... conformal transformations will naturally be incorporated in the kinematics of spacetime, and the corresponding conformal current will appear as part of the Noether conserved current [7].” This is because “ ... a cosmological term naturally introduces the conformal generators in the definition of spacetime transitivity.”
I understand (probably wrongly) that the main feature of conformal transformations is that they are shape-preserving on a small enough scale. If this is so, I have a question:
Lorentz transformations are not shape-preserving; the Lorentz contaction is uniaxial, as in the explanation of the null-result of the Michelson-Morley experiment.
Are the conformal transformations of de Sitter SR bolt-on additions that leave Lorentz contraction intact, while providing dilation via a non-zero cosmological constant?
And also, what exactly is the "proper conformal current" they talk of? Is it a sort of extra momentum-energy flux?
I need help in understanding the elements of a paper that I think could turn out to be quite important, namely http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.2274 de Sitter Relativity: a New Road to Quantum Gravity
R. Aldrovandi, J. G. Pereira)
Inter aliathey say that:
in de Sitter relativity “... conformal transformations will naturally be incorporated in the kinematics of spacetime, and the corresponding conformal current will appear as part of the Noether conserved current [7].” This is because “ ... a cosmological term naturally introduces the conformal generators in the definition of spacetime transitivity.”
I understand (probably wrongly) that the main feature of conformal transformations is that they are shape-preserving on a small enough scale. If this is so, I have a question:
Lorentz transformations are not shape-preserving; the Lorentz contaction is uniaxial, as in the explanation of the null-result of the Michelson-Morley experiment.
Are the conformal transformations of de Sitter SR bolt-on additions that leave Lorentz contraction intact, while providing dilation via a non-zero cosmological constant?
And also, what exactly is the "proper conformal current" they talk of? Is it a sort of extra momentum-energy flux?