QM: Fate of a particle of an arbitrary energy in the particle in a box problem

In summary, the conversation discusses the fate of a particle in the "particle in a box" problem, where the particle is placed in a box with infinite potential beyond the walls. The initial state of the particle is discussed, and it is determined that it will leave the electron gun with a distribution of energies centered around a specific value. However, when the particle is trapped in the box, it will have a different wavefunction that is a superposition of states with different energies. The expectation value of the energy before and after being trapped should be similar, but it is not possible for the particle to have an energy less than the ground state in the stationary state. The conversation also discusses the possibility of the particle gaining energy from the walls, but it
  • #1
shanu_bhaiya
64
0
QM: Fate of a particle of an arbitrary energy in "the particle in a box" problem

1. The Doubt
Consider the situation of a particle in a box with infinite potential beyond the walls.

Ψn = √(2/L) sin(nπx/L)
En = (nπħ/L)2/2m

My doubt is that what will happen, i.e. what will be the state of a single particle when left in such a box with initial kinetic energy E = ((0.2)πħ/L)2/2m.

The process of leaving the particle goes as follows (in one dimension):
First an electron-gun is placed in front of a wall and then e- is fired from it and suddenly after firing the e-, the gun is replaced by another wall.
Note that the length of the wall is L and the gun was placed at origin.

2. The attempt at a solution
I tried to calculate it and assumed that it's state will be:
Ψn = √(2/L) sin((0.2)πx/L)
It does obey the Schrodinger's Equation but then it doesn't obey the the boundary conditions and has a finite probability at x=L. So my assumption was wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


The electron will leave the electron gun with a distribution of energies centered around the value you mentioned. When it gets trapped it will, for a split second, have the same wavefunction it had before the gun was replaced with a wall. In the pic I've attached, I have the electron wavefunction leaving the electron gun at three different times. Note that in the third drawing, just after it's trapped, the wavefunction hasn't changed much, and that it's not one of the infinite square well's eigenfunctions. It is in a superposition of states, each state with a different energy. The expectation value of the energy before and after being trapped should be similar, though, but I'm not an expert. Hopefully this clears things up.
 

Attachments

  • electron.jpg
    electron.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 322
  • #3


The eigenstates (psi_n with energy En) you describe are not the only states possible.
Any combination of them is also possible (Schrodinger equation is linear).
Besides, any arbitrary state can be written as a linear combination of these eigenstates (they form a base).
They are like the normal modes of a string. The string does not need to oscillate in a normal mode.

However, these are solutions of the stationary Schrodinger equation. If you have a time dependent system, as you describe, you need to use the time dependent equation. Even more, the potential changes in time..
What you can say is that AFTER the system becomes again stationary, the state will be some combination of the eigenstates. Not necessarily the initial state.

In the stationary state, you cannot have energy less than the ground state.
(Like in a string with fixed ends and length L you cannot have standing waves longer than 2L. You may excite any non-standing wave but in the end (after some time) it either "die" or excite some standing wave modes)
 
  • #4


Thanks a lot to both of you for replying.
JoAuSc said:
The electron will leave the electron gun with a distribution of energies centered around the value you mentioned.

I didn't understand this clearly. I'm sure that my gun will shot the e- with E = ((0.2)πħ/L)2/2m. And if you talk of Uncertainty Principle, then I can safely modify my problem by saying that the electron leaves the gun with an energy between ((0.1)πħ/L)2/2m to ((0.8)πħ/L)2/2m. But you see that the problem remains same. Or, does your statement mean that it's initial state or Ψ before hitting the wall first time will be a composition of Ψn I mentioned?

JoAuSc said:
It is in a superposition of states, each state with a different energy. The expectation value of the energy before and after being trapped should be similar.

Thanks for the picture. But, it is impossible that the expectation value of allowed energies can be equal to E = ((0.2)πħ/L)2/2m, because it is less than all the allowed En.

nasu said:
The eigenstates (psi_n with energy En) you describe are not the only states possible.
Any combination of them is also possible (Schrodinger equation is linear).

I agree with Ψ, but what will happen with E, because it is even less than all the allowed En. The two options are:
1. It will remain same, which is not possible.
2. It will change, which must violate conservation of energy.

nasu said:
In the stationary state, you cannot have energy less than the ground state. (Like in a string with fixed ends and length L you cannot have standing waves longer than 2L. You may excite any non-standing wave but in the end (after some time) it either "die" or excite some standing wave modes)

So, option 2 must be true, i.e. it will change to one of the En. But since it's initial energy was already less than all the En, then from where it will gain the energy? Assume potential inside the well to be zero always.
 
  • #5


It doesn't violate conservation of energy. The wavefunction of the electron penetrates the region where you are going to erect the wall, if the electron has a definite energy it's not localized. The act of erecting the wall can bump the electron into a higher energy state.
 
  • #6


Thanks a lot for replying.

Dick said:
It doesn't violate conservation of energy.
Do you want to say that the electron will gain the energy from walls? As a wall, imagine a capacitor, a negatively charged one. Now according to what you said the projected or test electron must gain the energy from the interaction between the outer electrons on the capacitor and the test-electron; but how can it be possible because the electrons on the capacitor can be imagined to be not moving at all and so the test electron must leave with the kinetic energy with which it came, so after any number of hits to the wall, it's kinetic energy must not change. So how it bumps to higher En without breaking the law of conservation of energy?

Dick said:
The wave function of the electron penetrates the region where you are going to erect the wall, if the electron has a definite energy it's not localized. The act of erecting the wall can bump the electron into a higher energy state.
I really couldn't understand what you want to say, can you please be more descriptive?
 
Last edited:
  • #7


The electron 'interacts' with the wall. You know that this isn't classical physics, right? The final state the electron winds up in isn't even deterministic. You have an initial state, a 'big disturbance' and then a choice of final states to settle into. In QM there often isn't a much more detailed picture of what exactly happens in between the initial state and the final state than that.
 
  • #8


Thanks for clearing the matter, any more suggestions are still welcome. It seems now there is a long time until I start getting the feel of Quantum Mechanics, although I've just begun.
 

1. What is the particle in a box problem in quantum mechanics?

The particle in a box problem is a theoretical model used in quantum mechanics to study the behavior of a particle confined within a one-dimensional box. The box represents a potential well, and the particle is assumed to have an arbitrary energy.

2. What is the significance of studying the fate of a particle in the particle in a box problem?

Studying the fate of a particle in the particle in a box problem helps us understand the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, such as the concept of wave-particle duality and the quantization of energy levels.

3. What is the solution to the Schrödinger equation for the particle in a box problem?

The solution to the Schrödinger equation for the particle in a box problem is a set of wave functions, also known as eigenfunctions, which describe the probability distribution of the particle's position and momentum within the box at a given time.

4. How does the energy of the particle affect its behavior in the particle in a box problem?

The energy of the particle determines the number and spacing of the energy levels within the box. A higher energy particle will have more energy levels and a larger spacing between them, resulting in a more complex probability distribution and a faster rate of oscillation.

5. Can the particle in a box problem be applied to real-life scenarios?

While the particle in a box problem is a simplified model, it has been found to be applicable to various physical systems, such as electrons in a semiconductor and vibrational modes of molecules. It serves as a useful tool for understanding and predicting the behavior of quantum particles in confined spaces.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
899
Replies
12
Views
238
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
798
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top