Why are muons called mu-mesons if they're leptons?

  • Thread starter daveed
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Muons
In summary: I learned all this from Wikipedia" and that's why she knows so much about the topic.In summary, the term "meson" originally referred to particles with masses between the electron and proton, but it was later found that the first discovered meson was actually a new type of lepton called the muon. This caused some confusion and led to the term "mu-meson" being used in the past. However, the correct term for this particle is now simply "muon".
  • #1
daveed
138
0
why are muons called mu-mesons if they're leptons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Because historically the word meson meant a particle whose mass was intermediate between the electron and the proton. From the Greek for "midway thing". This was long before Gell-Mann thought of quarks. Only as the standard model was being put together, about 20 years later, did the present meaning of meson arise.
 
  • #3
On the topic of misnomers... Isospin was once called isotopic spin. A less misleading name would be isobaric spin. The tacit agreement seems to be to just shorten the word to isospin.
 
  • #4
daveed said:
why are muons called mu-mesons if they're leptons?

As someone else mentioned, the word "meson" comes from "middle one" because the first discovered had a mass intermediate between the masses of the electron on one hand and the masses of the proton and neutron on the other hand.

The link between "muons" and "mesons" is due to a confusion that lasted several years in the early 40's. Yukawa had predicted a particle that would carry the nuclear force between nucleons, a particle of a mass a little more than 100 MeV/c^2. Physicists soon detected a particle of about that mass in cosmic rays. It was then called the meson (well, mesotron first then the name meson was adopted). It had a mass of about 103 MeV/c^2. And then they found one more (about 135 MeV/c^2), and then more and more!

It was later realized that the first meson was *not* the carrier of the strong force. It was a new lepton (prompting Rabi to ask "who ordered *that*?). That's what we now call the muon. The particles near 135 MeV/c^2 (there are 3 of them, with charges 0,e,-e) are the pions and these are the particles predicted by Yukawa.

So it's for historical reasons that you sometimes see the name "mu-meson", because of the confusion between the muon and the mesons.

Pat
 

1. Why are muons called mu-mesons?

Muons were originally classified as mesons due to their relatively large mass compared to other leptons. However, further research showed that they are actually classified as leptons based on their interactions with other particles.

2. Are muons actually mesons?

No, muons are not actually mesons. They were originally classified as mesons due to their properties, but they are now classified as leptons based on their interactions with other particles.

3. What is the difference between a meson and a lepton?

A meson is a subatomic particle that is made up of a quark and an antiquark, while a lepton is a subatomic particle that is not made up of quarks. Mesons are heavier than leptons and interact through the strong nuclear force, while leptons interact through the weak nuclear force.

4. Why are muons sometimes referred to as mu-mesons?

Though muons are now classified as leptons, they are still sometimes referred to as mu-mesons due to historical reasons and to distinguish them from other types of leptons, such as electrons and neutrinos.

5. How are muons different from other leptons?

Muons have a larger mass than other leptons and are unstable, decaying into other particles after a short period of time. They also interact more strongly with other particles than other leptons, making them useful for studying high energy interactions.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
431
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
26
Views
863
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
696
Back
Top