- #36
Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 7,220
- 24
That wasn't really the original question, was it?JDoolin said:To the original question, "why not a free health care system," ...
That wasn't really the original question, was it?JDoolin said:To the original question, "why not a free health care system," ...
John Rawls was a philosopher who believed in the concept of justice as fairness. He argued that a just society should provide equal opportunities for all individuals, regardless of their socioeconomic status. In this sense, Rawls would support a free health care system as it would ensure that everyone has equal access to healthcare regardless of their ability to pay.
Rawls' theory of justice states that inequalities in society should only exist if they benefit the least advantaged members of society. In the context of health care, this means that a free health care system would benefit those who are less fortunate and cannot afford to pay for healthcare. It would also ensure that everyone has access to the same quality of care, regardless of their socioeconomic status.
Rawls believed that individuals should be rewarded for their hard work and talents, and a free health care system may discourage people from working hard if they know they can receive healthcare for free. He also acknowledged that there may be limited resources in a free health care system, and difficult decisions may need to be made about who receives certain treatments.
Rawls' theory of justice argues that individuals have a right to equal opportunities, and access to healthcare is necessary for individuals to have a fair chance at life. In this sense, healthcare can be seen as a basic human right, and a free health care system would ensure that everyone has access to this right, regardless of their socioeconomic status.
Rawls believed that a free health care system should also consider the needs of vulnerable populations, such as the elderly, children, and individuals with disabilities. He also argued that the system should be sustainable and not burden future generations with debt. Additionally, he believed that the system should promote overall social and economic equality, rather than just equal access to healthcare.