Contour Integral: Analyzing Complexities & Singularities

In summary, the conversation involves a discussion about finding the singularities and performing contour integration for a given function involving exponential and trigonometric terms. The participants also share their approaches and results for calculating the integral.
  • #1
MadMax
99
0
[tex]\int \frac{\rho^4 \sin^3{\theta} d \rho d \theta e^{i \rho r \cos{\theta}}}{(2 \pi)^2 [K^2 + \rho^2]}[/tex]

I am confused about where the singularities are in this function. Will they simply be at \rho = iK and -ik or does the \rho^4 factor make a difference?

Also the sin^3(\theta) e^(i \rho cos (\theta)) when evaluated on mathematica for example brings in some terms with three different powers of \rho some of which I am afraid will make the function odd in \rho in which case I would struggle with the final contour integration...

Any help suggestions would be much appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
OK well I just did a test to see if perhaps the factor of \rho^4 makes a difference by dividing the denominator by that factor... it seems that in that case there are no singularities... which can't be right since the integral is supposed to have a finite answer... and a contour integral with no singularities = 0 right? -> confused.

If I just assume the factor of \rho^4 on the numerator makes no difference, and that the singularities are at -ik and ik, then we still have something that maple says will have terms that aren't even functions in \rho, which I wouldn't know how to deal with when it comes to contour integration.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
hmm for now I am going to do the theta integral and worry about symmetry and singularities later.
 
  • #4
Good idea! I think you'll find that the parts that are odd in rho will cancel after the theta integration.
 
  • #5
We find

[tex]\int \frac{d \rho}{(2 \pi)^2} \frac{e^{-ir \rho}-e^{ir \rho}}{K^2 +\rho^2} \frac{\rho}{ir} \left [ \rho^2 - \frac{2 \rho}{ir} + \frac{1}{r^2} \right ] [/tex]

if we leave it like this we find that there are odd terms which I don't know how to handle...

the only thing I can think of doing is to factor in the rho's into the possibly singular denominator...

we then find

[tex]\int \frac{\rho d \rho^2}{(2 \pi)^2} \frac{e^{-ir \rho}-e^{ir \rho}}{ri} \left [ \frac{1}{iK^2 / \rho^2 + 1} + \frac{2}{ir[K^2 / \rho + \rho]} + \frac{1}{r^2[K^2 + \rho^2]} \right ] [/tex]

Now I'll try and figure out which of these terms exhibit singularities, cancel the ones that don't, and hope I'm doing the right thing...
 
Last edited:
  • #6
MadMax said:
We find

[tex]\int \frac{d \rho}{(2 \pi)^2} \frac{e^{-ir \rho}-e^{ir \rho}}{K^2 +\rho^2} \frac{\rho}{ir} \left [ \rho^2 - \frac{2 \rho}{ir} + \frac{1}{r^2} \right ] [/tex]

if we leave it like this we find that there are odd terms which I don't know how to handle...

the only thing I can think of doing is to factor in the rho's into the possibly singular denominator...

we then find

[tex]\int \frac{\rho d \rho^2}{(2 \pi)^2} \frac{e^{-ir \rho}-e^{ir \rho}}{ri} \left [ \frac{1}{iK^2 / \rho^2 + 1} + \frac{2}{ir[K^2 / \rho + \rho]} + \frac{1}{r^2[K^2 + \rho^2]} \right ] [/tex]

Now I'll try and figure out which of these terms exhibit singularities, cancel the ones that don't, and hope I'm doing the right thing...

Why are the odd terms a problem? One can still simply do teh contour integration nevertheless, no?
 
  • #7
nrqed said:
Why are the odd terms a problem? One can still simply do teh contour integration nevertheless, no?

I will simply use the first form you quoted and write 1/(k^2 + rho)^2 as
[tex] \frac{1}{(\rho + i K)(\rho -iK)} [/tex] and then you do the integrals over the two exponentials separately, picking up the contour that has a semicircle contribution vanishing at infinity (for example, for [itex] e^{-i r \rho}[/itex] you must close the contour below the real axis in order to pick the pole at -i K).

Patrick
 
  • #8
The problem he would have with the odd terms is that the first step to the contour integration is to extend it from the positive real axis to the whole real axis. With the even terms it's easy. Just do it and add a factor of 1/2. What to do with odd (since the extension will necessarily vanish, but not necessarily the original)? Fortunately, if he does the angular integration more carefully (it's not right as stated), he'll find that even power terms in rho are associated with a cos(r*rho) and the odd ones with a sin(r*rho) - so the extension is no problem.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Dick said:
The problem he would have with the odd terms is that the first step to the contour integration is to extend it from the positive real axis to the whole real axis. With the even terms it's easy. Just do it and add a factor of 1/2. What to do with odd (since the extension will necessarily vanish, but not necessarily the original)? Fortunately, if he does the angular integration more carefully (it's not right as stated), he'll find that even power terms in rho are associated with a cos(r*rho) and the odd ones with a sin(r*rho) - so the extension is no problem.

Ah ok. The limits of integration were not given and I had assumed that rho was integrated over the real axis but now I realize that those coordinates meant polar coordinates. Thanks for the clarification.
 
  • #10
:(

Mathematica gives pretty much the same answer I got (apart from a few factors of 2). There is one odd term with a factor cos(theta), and since the limits of the integration are between theta = 0 to theta = pi, it won't dissapear... I'm really confused and stumped.

How did you calculate the integral dick? I did it using substitution, the identity cos^2 a + sin^2 a = 1 and then integration by parts twice.

The answer I'm looking for is

[tex]\frac{K^2}{2 \pi} \frac{e^{-Kr}}{r} \left [ \frac{3}{Kr} + \frac{3}{K^2 r^2} \right ] [/tex]

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Well, buddy, I just can't agree with you and Mathematica there. The cos(theta) terms should give rise to terms like exp(i*rho*r)+/-exp(-i*rho*r). These are cos(rho*r) and sin(rho*r) respectively, giving me terms containing cos(rho*r)/r^2 and sin(rho*r)/r^3. Both of which are even. So the right answer is out there somewhere! It's not hopeless!
 
  • #12
This is what I 'm going to do. I'm going to go through the integral again, meticulously, on paper. Then transcribe into this thread. Let's see if, and if so where, I went wrong.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Fine idea. If you are REALLY meticulous, you'll probably catch all of your own errors and won't need to transcribe it. That would be pleasant.
 
  • #14
OK, still pretty much the same answer...

[tex]G = \int \frac{\rho^4 \sin^3{\theta} d \rho d \theta}{(2 \pi)^2} \frac{e^{i \rho r \cos \theta}}{K^2 + \rho^2}[/tex]

[tex]= \int D sin^3{\theta} d \rho d \theta e^{a \cos \theta}[/tex]

where

[tex]D= \frac{\rho^4}{(2 \pi)^2} \frac{1}{K^2 + \rho^2}[/tex]

and

[tex]a=i \rho r[/tex]


if u = cos(theta), du/dtheta = -sin(theta), so that dtheta=-du/sin(theta),

[tex]G = -\int D sin^2{\theta} d \rho du e^{a u}[/tex]


since cos^2(b) + sin^2(b) = 1

[tex]G = \int D (u^2 - 1) d \rho du e^{a u}[/tex]

using integration by parts

[tex]G = \int D \left[ \left ( \frac{u^2 e^{au}}{a} -2 \int \frac{u e^{au}}{a} du \right ) - \frac{e^{au}}{a} \right ] d \rho[/tex]

[tex]= \int D \left[ \left ( \frac{u^2 e^{au}}{a} -\frac{2}{a} \left( \frac{u e^{au}}{a} - \int \frac{e^{au}}{a} du \right ) \right ) - \frac{e^{au}}{a} \right ] d \rho[/tex]

[tex]= \int D \left[ \frac{u^2 e^{au}}{a} -\frac{2 u e^{au}}{a^2} + \frac{2 e^{au}}{a^3} - \frac{e^{au}}{a}\right ] d \rho[/tex]

Considering Dick's next post I'll cut it there for now.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
MadMax said:
[tex]= \int D \left[ \frac{u^2 e^{au}}{a} -\frac{2 u e^{au}}{a^2} + \frac{2 e^{au}}{a^3} - \frac{e^{au}}{a}\right ] d \rho[/tex]

Whoa, stop, stop! You are going backwards! Just evaluate the above expression between u=-1 and u=1. Notice that in this expression the 1/a terms drop out at both limits!
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Here is your mistake. You've factored the problem as A(u)*B(u). Then to evaluate between u=-1 and u=1, you are computing (A(-1)-A(1))*(B(-1)-B(1)). The correct answer is A(-1)*B(-1)-A(1)*B(1). Which is NOT THE SAME THING!
 
  • #17
Yes I was making a mistake putting in the limits. Thanks.

OK so now we have

[tex]= \int D \left[ \frac{2 e^{-a}}{a^2} +\frac{2 e^{-a}}{a^3} + \frac{2 e^{a}}{a^2} - \frac{2 e^{a}}{a^3}\right ] d \rho[/tex]

but since D is even in rho and the exponential is odd in rho, the terms with a factor of 1/a^2 (which is even in rho) will be odd in rho, (with the terms having a factor of 1/a^3 being even in rho).
 
  • #18
Beg to differ. The a^2 term looks like (exp(a)+exp(-a))/a^2. I call that EVEN in rho. And (exp(a)-exp(-a))/a^3 is also even. Flip a to -a and see what happens... Exponentials are NOT ODD.
 
Last edited:
  • #19
nevermind...
 
Last edited:
  • #20
woo! I think i just understood what you meant. I was just too dense to see. if we convert the exponentials into sin and cos we are sorted! thanks a million dick, should be fine now :)
 
  • #21
Good. Once you're ok with the extension to the whole real line, you'll have to break them up again into + and - imaginary parts to get the correct contours, right?
 

1. What is a contour integral?

A contour integral is a mathematical tool used to evaluate complex functions along a given path in the complex plane. It involves integrating the function along a closed curve, known as a contour, in the complex plane.

2. How is a contour integral different from a regular integral?

A contour integral is different from a regular integral because it is evaluated in the complex plane instead of the real plane. This means that the path of integration is not a straight line, but rather a curved path in the complex plane.

3. What is the significance of analyzing complexities and singularities in a contour integral?

Analyzing complexities and singularities in a contour integral allows us to understand the behavior of a function in the complex plane. It helps us determine if the function has any poles or essential singularities, and how these points affect the value of the integral.

4. How do you calculate a contour integral?

To calculate a contour integral, you need to first define the contour along which the integration will be performed. Then, you need to parameterize the contour and express the function in terms of the parameter. Next, you integrate the function along the contour using standard integration techniques. Finally, you evaluate the integral and take into account any singularities or branch cuts that may be present.

5. What are some real-world applications of contour integrals?

Contour integrals have many applications in physics, engineering, and other scientific fields. They are used to calculate quantities such as electric and magnetic fields, fluid flow, and heat transfer in complex systems. They are also used in the analysis of signal processing and image processing algorithms.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
867
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
695
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
545
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
300
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
675
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
939
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
950
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top