Simple math rules seem contradictory

  • Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Rules
In summary, the conversation discusses a mistake made in simplifying an expression and the concept of taking individual roots in an expression. The correct decomposition is also provided.
  • #1
Holocene
237
0
Simple math rules seem contradictory... :(

Consider this simple expression:

[tex]x^8 - 16[/tex]

If we wanted to write this expression as the product of two factors, we could start with something simple like this:

[tex]\sqrt{x^8 -16}[/tex] . [tex]\sqrt{x^8 -16}[/tex]

From that, we would simply get this:

[tex](x^4 - 4)(x^4 - 4)[/tex]

This is wrong though, as it does not equal the original expression. Multiplying two negative values will result in a positive value for 16. This is false, as the original exprsssion clearly has a negative value for 16.

So, one of the signs in [tex](x^4 - 4)(x^4 - 4)[/tex] must chnage to a possitive sign.

It just seem to me like, at times, some of the mathematical rules seem contradictory.

Or am I wrong in that you cannot take the individual roots of the terms in an expression?

Anyone information would be greatly appreciated?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Actually,

[tex] x^8 -16 = (x^4 +4)(x^4 -4)[/tex]

What is the point of breaking the expression into radicals?
 
  • #3
Waht is exactly right. The only problem with his/her answer is that it wasn't explicit enough.

Holocene said:
Or am I wrong in that you cannot take the individual roots of the terms in an expression?

Holocene, what you did in the original post was wrong. The square root does not distribute over subtraction. You cannot take individual roots of the terms in an expression. Example: Consider the Pythagorean triple [itex]3^2+4^2=5^2[/itex], so [itex]\sqrt{5^2-4^2} = 3[/itex]. Taking roots of individual terms as was done in the OP would lead to 5-4=1, obviously not 3.
 
  • #4
D H said:
Holocene, what you did in the original post was wrong. The square root does not distribute over subtraction. You cannot take individual roots of the terms in an expression. Example: Consider the Pythagorean triple [itex]3^2+4^2=5^2[/itex], so [itex]\sqrt{5^2-4^2} = 3[/itex]. Taking roots of individual terms as was done in the OP would lead to 5-4=1, obviously not 3.

So many students make this mistake!
 
  • #5
Holocene said:
Consider this simple expression:

[tex]x^8 - 16[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{x^8 -16}[/tex] . [tex]\sqrt{x^8 -16}[/tex]

[tex](x^4 - 4)(x^4 - 4)[/tex]

This is wrong though, as it does not equal the original expression. Multiplying two negative values will result in a positive value for 16. This is false, as the original exprsssion clearly has a negative value for 16.

So, one of the signs in [tex](x^4 - 4)(x^4 - 4)[/tex] must chnage to a possitive sign.

It just seem to me like, at times, some of the mathematical rules seem contradictory.

Or am I wrong in that you cannot take the individual roots of the terms in an expression?

Anyone information would be greatly appreciated?

It should be the difference of squares, so it should have (a+b)(a-b).
Your breaking apart of the expression into radical was wrong. So no, the mathematical rules do not contradict each other.
 
  • #6
The correct radicand decomposition is:
[tex]x^{8}-16=sign(x^{8}-16)\sqrt{|x^{8}-16|}\sqrt{|x^{8}-16|}[/tex]
 
  • #7
wow no wonder i couldn't figure out how he reduced the roots
 

What are some examples of simple math rules that seem contradictory?

Some examples include the fact that multiplying two negative numbers results in a positive number, but dividing a negative number by a negative number results in a negative number. Another example is that the sum of all angles in a triangle is 180 degrees, but in non-Euclidean geometry, the sum can be greater than 180 degrees.

Why do these math rules seem contradictory?

These rules may seem contradictory because they do not align with our everyday experiences and intuitions about how numbers and geometry work. They may also seem contradictory because they are based on different mathematical systems or theories.

How can these math rules be proven or explained?

These math rules can be proven or explained through mathematical proofs and logic. They may also be explained by understanding the underlying mathematical principles and theories that govern these rules.

Can these math rules be applied in real-world situations?

Yes, these math rules can be applied in real-world situations. For example, multiplying negative numbers can be applied in calculating debt or loss, and the sum of angles in a triangle is used in navigation and construction. However, in some cases, these rules may need to be adjusted or modified to fit specific real-world scenarios.

What are the implications of these math rules in other areas of science?

These math rules have wide-ranging implications in various fields of science, including physics, engineering, and computer science. They form the basis for many mathematical models and calculations that are used in these fields. Understanding these rules is essential for advancing our understanding and application of science.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
273
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
705
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top