Gravitational Potential Energy

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of potential energy and the confusion surrounding its application in a thought experiment involving throwing a stone upwards from the Earth's surface. It is concluded that the work done on the stone increases the total energy to 0, and the "stored" energy between the masses can be considered gravitational potential energy.
  • #1
J. Richter
9
0
Hi.

I am a little confused about this:

If I throw a stone straight upwards from the surface of the Earth, with the escape speed of 11,2 km/s, assuming that no air or other particles gets in the way, and waited for a very, very long time, the velocity of my stone (and the Earth in the opposite direction) would be almost 0, and the gravitational potential energy between my stone and the Earth would be almost 0 as well, according to the formula for gravitational potential energy.

However I used a lot of energy to throw that stone.
That energy I used to actually do some work, must be stored somehow, as it can’t disappear.

It is obvious, that the energy is stored in this “end” scenario itself.
If something far out there in space gave the stone a tiny little push towards the Earth, it would accelerate “backwards”, until it reaches 11,2 km/s, hit the surface of the Earth, and converts it’s kinetic energy to heat.

This kind of “stored” energy that the two masses have, when being far away from each other, to make it up for the loss of energy in my muscles after throwing the stone, appears to be different from the potential energy described in the formula for gravitational potential energy.

And that’s what confuses me.

If we can’t call this additional “stored” energy for potential energy between the masses, what can we call it then? And why does the formula for gravitational potential energy say that the resulting energy in this “throwing stone“ thought experiment is 0, when I actually did some work on the stone while throwing it?

That seems to be the same as saying, that the energy I used is lost forever.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
J. Richter said:
This kind of “stored” energy that the two masses have, when being far away from each other, to make it up for the loss of energy in my muscles after throwing the stone, appears to be different from the potential energy described in the formula for gravitational potential energy.
Why do you think that? That "stored" energy is gravitational potential energy.

And that’s what confuses me.

If we can’t call this additional “stored” energy for potential energy between the masses, what can we call it then? And why does the formula for gravitational potential energy say that the resulting energy in this “throwing stone“ thought experiment is 0, when I actually did some work on the stone while throwing it?
You have to compare the final energy of 0 to what you started with. Gravitational PE between two objects is given by:

[tex]-\frac{Gm_1m_2}{r}[/tex]

It is negative for finite distances. Thus the work you did on the stone increases the total energy to 0.
 
  • #3


Hi there,

I can understand your confusion about the concept of gravitational potential energy. Allow me to clarify some points for you.

Firstly, the formula for gravitational potential energy (GPE) that you mentioned is only applicable in a system where the two masses are stationary and not in motion. In your thought experiment, the stone and the Earth are both in motion, and therefore the formula cannot accurately represent the energy of the system.

Secondly, the energy that you used to throw the stone is not lost forever. It is transformed into different forms of energy - kinetic energy of the stone, potential energy of the stone-Earth system, and heat energy due to friction. This transformation of energy is governed by the law of conservation of energy, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another.

Now, coming to the additional "stored" energy that you mentioned - this is indeed potential energy between the two masses, but it is not gravitational potential energy as described by the formula. This energy is a combination of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy of the system. In your thought experiment, the stone has both kinetic energy due to its motion and potential energy due to its position in the Earth's gravitational field.

In summary, the formula for gravitational potential energy is only applicable in specific conditions, and the energy you used to throw the stone is not lost forever but transformed into different forms. I hope this helps to clear up your confusion. Keep asking questions and exploring the wonders of science!
 

1. What is gravitational potential energy?

Gravitational potential energy is the energy an object possesses due to its position in a gravitational field. It is the potential for an object to do work as a result of its position in a gravitational field.

2. How is gravitational potential energy calculated?

Gravitational potential energy is calculated by multiplying the mass of the object by the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s^2) and the height of the object above the ground.

3. What factors affect the gravitational potential energy of an object?

The factors that affect the gravitational potential energy of an object include its mass, the acceleration due to gravity, and its height above the ground. The higher the object is, the greater its gravitational potential energy will be.

4. Can gravitational potential energy be converted into other forms of energy?

Yes, gravitational potential energy can be converted into other forms of energy. When an object falls, its gravitational potential energy is converted into kinetic energy, which is the energy of motion.

5. How is gravitational potential energy related to potential and kinetic energy?

Gravitational potential energy is a type of potential energy, which is the energy an object has due to its position. It is related to kinetic energy, which is the energy an object has due to its motion, as potential energy can be converted into kinetic energy and vice versa.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
45
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
11K
Replies
10
Views
943
  • Mechanics
Replies
3
Views
68
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top