Solving quadratic inequalities and absolute values

In summary, the conversation discusses how to solve the inequality |x|/|x+2| < 2 and provides examples and methods for solving it. It includes a discussion on testing cases for inner functions and using graphical methods, as well as a step-by-step explanation of the correct solution. The final answer is that the required set is { x ϵ R : x < -4 OR x > -4/3 }.
  • #1
meeklobraca
189
0

Homework Statement



lxl <2
lx+2l

The question is asking to solve this

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ive tried bringint the 2 over which leads me to l-x-4l over lx +2l < 0 but then the absolute value confuses the heck out of me on where to go from here. Do I break it up into x -4 >0 and x+2 < 0 to solve it?

Also if there is some literature on the site to help me with this subject further I would appreciate it.

Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How did you get [tex]\frac{|-x-4|}{|x+2|} < 0[/tex] from [tex]\frac{|x|}{|x+2|} < 2[/tex]? You have assumed that x and x+2 have the same sign. You must test cases for where the stuff inside the absolute values are positive or negative independently of each other.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Not necessary to consider cases where either inner function is positive/negative - that's more complicated in this case.

You need to recognize that both sides of the inequality |x|/|x+2| < 2 are positive for all real x.

Might be more apparent if you rewrite |x|/|x+2| = |x/(x+2)| < 2

Spoiler:
Squaring both sides: x^2/(x+2)^2 < 4
Bring "4" over to the left: [-3(x^2) -16x - 16]/(x+2)^2 < 0
Simplifying the positivity: [3(x^2)+16x+16]/(x+2)^2 > 0
Factorising: (3x+4)(x+4)/(x+2)^2 > 0

required set = { x ϵ R : x < -4 OR x > -4/3 }
 
  • #4
That is so far out of my league its sick.

But I am still fairly confused here but bare with me, id like to piece this together.

Ive been doing some research on it and I found this example that may apply.

http://www.intmath.com/Inequalities/4_Inequalities-Absolute-Values.php in this link down near the bottom there is excerise 2 solve

http://http://www.intmath.com/Inequalities/Image2820.gif" [Broken]

The answer being

http://http://www.intmath.com/Inequalities/Image2821.gif" [Broken]




So using that example I expanded this question to

-2x-4 < x < 2x+4

Am I on the right track? From there can I test the cases to find the solution?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
I don't think that's correct. You can't multiply both sides by x+2, reason being that x+2 may be negative (reversal of inequality signs). Doing so would cause you to lose one set of values (x < -4 if I'm not wrong)

But you can still use that method like this:

|x/(x+2)| < 2
-2 < x/(x+2) < 2

Consider -2 < x/(x+2) AND x/(x+2) < 2
=> [x/(x+2)] + 2 > 0 AND [x/(x+2)] - 2 < 0
...
...
...
which yields required set = { x ϵ R : x < -4 OR x > -4/3 }

1. But remember that you're solving the intersection of the two inequalities in this case. Let me give you an example. Say, suppose we have:

-2x + 3 < x < 2x + 3
=> -2x + 3 < x AND x < 2x + 3
=> x > 1 AND x > -3
=> Taking the intersection of {x > 1} and {x > -3}, required set = { x ϵ R : x > 1 }

2. Also, take careful note that |f(x)| < 2 and |f(x)| > 2 are VASTLY different, and that you can't use this (shortcut) method when the other side of the inequality is not a real constant.

|f(x)| < 2
-2 < f(x) < 2

whereas

|f(x)| > 2
f(x) < -2 or f(x) > 2

It's a matter of preference. You can also solve the problem by a graphical method, the testing of cases for inner functions, and in this case, squaring and the one you've highlighted. I preferred squaring in this case because it was the fastest for me. But there are instances where you have no other choice but to test the inner functions (the 'sureproof' method, but the slowest too), e.g.:

|x+2| < 2x - |x+1|

because both sides are not necessarily positive.
 
  • #6
Would you be able to explain how you got this..

x < -4


For the equation x/x+2 <2
I get x/x+2 - 2 < 0
expanded we get x-2x+4 < 0
then -x + 4 < 0
-x < -4
x > -4

If you could let me know where we differ that would be awesome!

Thank you!
 
  • #7
Your expansion is wrong.

You said:
"x-2x+4 < 0"

x/(x+2) - 2(x+2)/(x+2) < 0

(x - 2x - 4)/(x+2) < 0

(-x-4)/(x+2) < 0

Also, it's wrong to remove the denominator just like that, and moreover, doing so loses you the asymptotic value of x (it is just coincidental that in this case your asymptote is in the "negative" region).
 
  • #8
"(x - 2x - 4)/(x+2) < 0"

this would mean that x > 4 then. Cause the top half of that is -x < 4 which leads to x > 4 correct?

and then x < -2 so... we have x > 4, x < -2, and then x > -4/3?
 
  • #9
I don't know how you got your numbers, perhaps you need to review your basic inequalities involving polynomials before you attempt absolute-valued functions. You can use number lines to visualize the solution. I hope this helps:

I earlier mentioned:
(x - 2x - 4)/(x+2) < 0

(-x-4)/(x+2) < 0
(x+4)/(x+2) > 0

|+||||||-|||||||+||
----o--------o-----> x
|||-4|||||||-2||||||

{x < -4 or x > -2}


[x/(x+2)] + 2 > 0
(3x+4)/(x+2) > 0

|+||||||-|||||||+||
----o--------o-----> x
|||-2||||||-4/3|||||

{x < -2 or x > -4/3}

Intersection of the 2 sets (you might want to draw a 3rd number line if you can't see this) gives you required set = { x ϵ R : x < -4 OR x > -4/3 }

(Edit; PS: sorry for the strange lines, had to use those because the encoding prevented me from using more than one spacing between characters)
 
Last edited:

1. What is a quadratic inequality?

A quadratic inequality is an inequality that involves a quadratic function, which is a polynomial function of degree 2. It can be written in the form of ax^2 + bx + c < 0 (less than), ax^2 + bx + c > 0 (greater than), ax^2 + bx + c ≤ 0 (less than or equal to), or ax^2 + bx + c ≥ 0 (greater than or equal to).

2. How do you solve a quadratic inequality?

To solve a quadratic inequality, you can use the same methods as solving a regular quadratic equation. First, factor the quadratic expression if possible. Then, plot the solutions on a number line and determine the intervals where the inequality is true. Finally, write the solution in interval notation.

3. What is an absolute value?

The absolute value of a number is its distance from 0 on a number line. It is always positive and represented by two vertical bars around the number. For example, the absolute value of -5 is 5, and the absolute value of 5 is also 5.

4. How do you solve absolute value inequalities?

To solve an absolute value inequality, you can first isolate the absolute value expression on one side of the inequality. Then, you can split the inequality into two separate inequalities, one without the absolute value and one with the absolute value equal to both the positive and negative value. Solve each inequality separately and combine the solutions to get the final answer.

5. What is the difference between solving quadratic inequalities and absolute value inequalities?

The main difference between solving quadratic inequalities and absolute value inequalities is that absolute value inequalities can have two solutions, while quadratic inequalities can have multiple solutions or no solutions. Additionally, the methods for solving them are slightly different, with absolute value inequalities requiring the use of the absolute value property.

Similar threads

  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
707
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
32
Views
909
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
968
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
738
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
445
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top