Conceptual Problem in rotating cone problem

In summary, the conversation discusses a problem involving a rotating cone and a block sliding down a groove on its surface. The final angular velocity of the combined system is determined using the conservation of angular momentum and the speed of the block at the bottom is found using conservation of energy. However, there is a question about the loss of angular velocity of the cone when the block is placed on it. It is suggested that this could be due to a torque acting between the block and the cone, and the moment of inertia of the system increasing. Additionally, there is a discussion about the assumptions made in the solution regarding the angular velocity of the block and the energy conservation equation.
  • #1
WannabeNewton
Science Advisor
5,844
550

Homework Statement


A cone of height h and base radius R is free to rotate about a fixed
vertical axis. It has a thin groove cut in the surface.
The cone is set rotating freely with angular speed ω0 and a small block
of mass m is released in the top of the frictionless groove and allowed to
slide under gravity. Assume that the block stays in the groove. Take the
moment of inertia of the cone about the vertical axis to be I0.
(a) What is the angular velocity of the cone when the block reaches
the bottom?
(b) Find the speed of the block in inertial space when it reaches the
bottom.

The Attempt at a Solution


My issue isn't really with solving the two parts because that part is quite straightforward. Just apply conservation of angular momentum about the axis of rotation for part (a) and then conservation of energy for part (b). My problem is more with this: since there is never a presence of a net torque about the axis of rotation, [itex]\partial _{t}L_{y} = 0[/itex] (taking the y-axis to be the vertical axis of rotation) so, since the block and cone become one combined system much like in a perfectly inelastic collision, [itex]I_{0}w_{0} = (I_{0} + mR^{2})w_{f}[/itex] and we can easily solve for the final angular velocity of the combined system which is equivalent to the final angular velocity of the block. My question is simply: where does the angular velocity of the initial cone without the block go? At the end when the block reaches the ground there is obviously a loss in the angular velocity of the system from before the mass was placed on the rotating cone. I'm not sure where the angular velocity actually goes. Using conservation of energy I got that [itex]v_{f} = \sqrt{\frac{I_{0}}{m}(w_{0}^{2} - w_{f}^{2}) + 2gh}[/itex] and since [itex]w_{0} >= w_{f} >= 0[/itex], [itex]w_{0}^{2} >= w_{f}^{2} >= 0[/itex] so unless the rotation was zero to begin with (in which case vf is just sqrt(2gh)), there is a positive term that adds on to the 2gh term so am I right in saying that the loss in angular velocity simply gets added to the translational velocity of the block? It seemed too obvious so I don't know if there is some shady business here (=p). Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
and we can easily solve for the final angular velocity of the combined system which is equivalent to the final angular velocity of the block.
Why?

where does the angular velocity of the initial cone without the block go?
There is a torque acting between block and cone, slowing down the cone.

At the end when the block reaches the ground there is obviously a loss in the angular velocity of the system from before the mass was placed on the rotating cone.
Right, and its moment of inertia increased.
 
  • #3
mfb said:
Why?
Because once we place the block on the already rotating cone, we have a single system consisting of the combined moments of inertia of the block and cone about the vertical axis and the reduced angular velocity of said combined system about the vertical axis. The block is rotating with the cone as one about said axis. Thanks for the reply.
 
  • #4
The block can rotate quicker or slower than the cone. Actually, it has to do this in order to get down.
 
  • #5
mfb said:
The block can rotate quicker or slower than the cone. Actually, it has to do this in order to get down.
Wait do you mean set up the conservation of angular momentum like [itex]I_{0}w_{0} = I_{0}w_{f,cone} + mR^{2}w_{f,block} [/itex]? This is what I had initially done and it went with my intuition but I had to kind of force my mind to change my initial intuition because the solution itself took the final angular velocity of the block to be that of the system as well so I felt my initial logic was flawed somehow.
 
  • #6
Maybe that solution assumed that the velocity of the block relative to the cone is negligible. In general, it is not.
 
  • #7
mfb said:
Maybe that solution assumed that the velocity of the block relative to the cone is negligible. In general, it is not.
Weird because the question didn't state it. Now I have another variable to take care of however if that assumption is not made.
 
  • #8
Looking again at how it wrote down the energy conservation equation, it totally disregarded the angular velocity of the block and considered only the new angular velocity of the cone after the block is placed on it (it included the translational velocity of the block of course) but I can see no justification for this based on the problem statement. Do you?
 
  • #9
WannabeNewton said:
Looking again at how it wrote down the energy conservation equation, it totally disregarded the angular velocity of the block
Doesn't look that way to me. mvf2/2 includes the energy due to rotation, i.e. the horizontal component of its KE.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
Doesn't look that way to me. mvf2/2 includes the energy due to rotation, i.e. the horizontal component of its KE.
Not sure what you mean by horizontal component of KE since KE is a scalar but usually when one writes down conservation of energy for motion involving both translation and rotation, one includes the 1\2mv^2 term and the 1\2Iw^2 term separately for a given body massive object that is assuming the speed v the question is asking for is that of the orbital motion of the center of mass (the radial component that is but if they just want the overall speed then I agree with you). However this still doesn't address the part about the conservation of angular momentum where it just considers the angular velocity of the whole system.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
WannabeNewton said:
Not sure what you mean by horizontal component of KE since KE is a scalar
If the horizontal and normal to horizontal components of velocity are vh, vn, then it is reasonable to describe the KE as having components mvh2/2 and mvn2/2, no?
energy for motion involving both translation and rotation, one includes the 1\2mv^2 term and the 1\2Iw^2 term separately for a given body massive object that is assuming the speed the question is asking for is the orbital motion of the center of mass.
It's asking for the speed. The mass is considered to be a point mass, so its 'rotational' KE about the cone's axis will be m(Rωf2)/2 = mvh2/2. I.e. it doesn't matter whether you consider vh to be a speed (transiently) about the cone's axis or just the horizontal component of a linear velocity, you get the same answers for its total KE and for its scalar speed.
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
If the horizontal and normal to horizontal components of velocity are vh, vn, then it is reasonable to describe the KE as having components mvh2/2 and mvn2/2, no?
Well when you said components I assumed you were talking about an expansion in terms of basis vectors.
It's asking for the speed. The mass is considered to be a point mass, so its 'rotational' KE about the cone's axis will be m(Rωf2)/2 = mvh2/2. I.e. it doesn't matter whether you consider vh to be a speed (transiently) about the cone's axis or just the horizontal component of a linear velocity, you get the same answers for its total KE and for its scalar speed.
I have no problem with this at all if it is indeed asking for the speed itself. I thought it was asking for the radial component. Still unsure about the conservation of angular momentum part though.
 
  • #13
WannabeNewton said:
I have no problem with this at all if it is indeed asking for the speed itself. I thought it was asking for the radial component.
In the OP it just says speed.
Still unsure about the conservation of angular momentum part though.
What's your doubt there?
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
What's your doubt there?
As to why it assumes both the block and the cone will have the same final angular velocity (as in why the tangential velocity of the block along the cone will be the same as the angular velocity of the cone itself at the end). Thanks for all the help so far btw.
 
  • #15
WannabeNewton said:
As to why it assumes both the block and the cone will have the same final angular velocity (as in why the tangential velocity of the block along the cone will be the same as the angular velocity of the cone itself at the end). Thanks for all the help so far btw.
The problem statement omits to say that the groove is a straight line. But you have to assume that to be able to solve it.
 
  • #16
haruspex said:
The problem statement omits to say that the groove is a straight line. But you have to assume that to be able to solve it.
Ah so in that case we can indeed treat the two objects as being one for the purposes of the final angular velocity since their tangential velocities will be directed along the same [itex]\hat{\theta }[/itex] if the block is constrained to a straight line?
 
  • #17
Yep.
 

1. What is the concept of a rotating cone problem?

The rotating cone problem is a common conceptual problem in physics that involves a cone rotating about its central axis. This problem allows scientists to explore concepts such as rotational motion, angular velocity, and centripetal force.

2. How do you solve a rotating cone problem?

To solve a rotating cone problem, you first need to identify and understand the given variables, such as the radius of the cone, the angular velocity, and the centripetal force. Then, you can use the relevant equations, such as the formula for centripetal acceleration, to calculate the unknown variables.

3. What is the significance of the rotating cone problem?

The rotating cone problem is significant because it allows scientists to apply principles of rotational motion to a real-world scenario. This problem also helps to illustrate the relationship between centripetal force and angular velocity, and how changes in one can affect the other.

4. What are some common mistakes when solving a rotating cone problem?

One common mistake when solving a rotating cone problem is forgetting to convert units to the correct ones. For example, if the angular velocity is given in revolutions per second, it needs to be converted to radians per second for the equations to work. Another mistake is not considering the direction of the forces involved, which can lead to incorrect solutions.

5. How can the rotating cone problem be applied in real life situations?

The rotating cone problem has many real-life applications, such as understanding the motion of a spinning top or a gyroscope. It can also be used in engineering, for example, in designing and analyzing the motion of rotating machinery or vehicles. Additionally, the principles learned from this problem can be applied to other rotational motion problems in physics and engineering.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
216
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
10
Replies
335
Views
7K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
176
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
942
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
717
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top