Relativistic Particle Decay in Center of Momentum Frame

In summary, The relativistic mass of an electron is greater than its classical mass. The relativistic kinetic energy of an electron is equal to its relativistic mass times the speed of light.
  • #1
strangequark
38
0

Homework Statement



a) What potntial difference will accelerate an electron to the speed of light according to classical physics?
b) With this potential difference, what speed will the electron achieve relativistically?
c) What is the relativistic mass at that speed?
d) What is the relativistic kinetic energy?


Homework Equations



see solution

The Attempt at a Solution



a) [tex]q_{e} \Delta V = \Delta K = \frac{1}{2}m_{e}c^{2}[/tex]

[tex]\Delta V =\frac{m_{e}c^{2}}{2q_{e}}=255,499 Volts[/tex]

b) here I'm assuming that i can say (is this assumption valid??):

[tex]q_{e} \DeltaV = \gamma m_{e}c^{2}-m_{e}c^{2} [/tex]

then solve for [tex]\gamma[/tex],

[tex]\gamma=\frac{q_{e}\DeltaV}{m_{e}c^{2}}+1[/tex]

the velocity follows immediately

c) [tex]m = \gamma m_{e}[/tex]

d) here's where I get confused, if i calculate kinetic energy using:

[tex]K=\gamma m_{e}c^{2}-m_{e}c^{2}[/tex]

I get the same kinetic energy ([tex]q_{e} \Delta V [/tex]) I assumed in part b (obviously)... now this makes some sense to me, in the respect that the classical kinetic energy at the speed the electron would obtain relativistically is lower than this, but it is also equal to [tex]\frac{1}{2}m_{e}c^{2}[/tex]... i don't think this is a contradiction, but it seems strange... is my underying assumption in part b wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
strangequark said:

The Attempt at a Solution



a) [tex]q_{e} \Delta V = \Delta K = \frac{1}{2}m_{e}c^{2}[/tex]

[tex]\Delta V =\frac{m_{e}c^{2}}{2q_{e}}=255,499 Volts[/tex]

This is fine. (If you have learned about masses of particles expressed in electron-volts, you'll see that this value makes sense. Otherwise, don't worry about that for now...)

b) here I'm assuming that i can say (is this assumption valid??):

[tex]q_{e}\DeltaV = \gamma m_{e}c^{2}-m_{e}c^{2} [/tex]

then solve for [tex]\gamma[/tex],

[tex]\gamma=\frac{q_{e}\DeltaV}{m_{e}c^{2}}+1[/tex]

the velocity follows immediately

For some reason, your delta-V isn't displaying; but your intended expression (as seen in the TeX code) is correct, I believe, so you get gamma = 3/2 .

c) [tex]m = \gamma m_{e}[/tex]

d) here's where I get confused, if i calculate kinetic energy using:

[tex]K=\gamma m_{e}c^{2}-m_{e}c^{2}[/tex]

I get the same kinetic energy ([tex]q_{e} \Delta V [/tex]) I assumed in part b (obviously)... now this makes some sense to me, in the respect that the classical kinetic energy at the speed the electron would obtain relativistically is lower than this, but it is also equal to [tex]\frac{1}{2}m_{e}c^{2}[/tex]... i don't think this is a contradiction, but it seems strange... is my underying assumption in part b wrong?

The rest of this seems correct to me as well. You *will* get the same KE as you had classically (your instructor is being cute here). There is no contradiction: the Lorentz factor alters the velocity corresponding to various values of KE. As you note, the speed at which KE is one-half the rest mass-energy of the electron is lower than the classical result. The function now permits KE to grow without limit as speed approaches c ; the illustration of this is, I think, the main point of this exercise.
 
  • #3
Great, thanks... I looked at it quite a few times, and couldn't figure out how it could be wrong, but it seemed too convenient... I have another quick question actually if you don't mind...

A different problem is looking at a particle decay in the center of momentum frame (S) and the laboratory frame (S')...

It gives me the total energy of the parent particle,[tex]E_{total}= 498 MeV[/tex], and the individual rest energies of the daughter particles, 135 MeV each. The particle decays at some point, and the two daughter particles leave w/ energy and momentum [tex]p_{1},E_{1}[/tex] and [tex]p_{2}, E_{2}[/tex]. In frame S, the parent particle is at rest. In frame S' it moves with a velocity of [tex]v = \frac{3c}{5} [/tex], and the daughter particles have energies and momenta [tex]E_{1}',p_{1}'[/tex] and [tex]E_{2}',p_{2}'[/tex].

For the S frame, (I've assumed that they energies/momenta were equal) and said that:

[tex]
E_{total}=E_{1}+E_{2}=2E_{daughter}
[/tex]

Then obtained the momentum for each from:

[tex]
E^{2}=(pc)^{2}+(m_{0}c^{2})^{2}
[/tex]

For the S' frame, I'm thinking that if I find the velocities of each particle with respect to S' using the Lorentz velocity transform, I can use that velocity to find the momentum via:

[tex]
p=\gamma m_{0} u_{S'}
[/tex]

where u will be velocity relative to S'... Now, if I am looking at the situation the right way, I will have a different [tex]\gamma[/tex] for each of the particles when figuring their momentum in S'. So for the momentum of particle 1, I'll have:

[tex]
p_{1}=\frac{m_{0}u_{S'}}{\sqrt{1-(\frac{u_{S'}}{c})^{2}}}[/tex]

Would that be correct?
 
Last edited:

1. What is a relativistic electron?

A relativistic electron is an electron that is moving at a significant fraction of the speed of light. This means that the electron exhibits the effects of special relativity, including time dilation and length contraction.

2. How is the behavior of a relativistic electron different from a non-relativistic electron?

A non-relativistic electron follows classical Newtonian mechanics, while a relativistic electron follows the principles of special relativity. This means that a relativistic electron has a greater mass and energy, and experiences time and space differently than a non-relativistic electron.

3. What applications does the study of relativistic electrons have?

The study of relativistic electrons has many applications in different fields, including particle physics, astrophysics, and engineering. It is also essential for understanding the behavior of electrons in high-energy environments, such as in particle accelerators or in space.

4. Can relativistic electrons be produced artificially?

Yes, relativistic electrons can be produced artificially using particle accelerators. These machines use electromagnetic fields to accelerate electrons to high speeds, making them relativistic. Relativistic electrons can also be produced in natural processes, such as in lightning strikes or in space.

5. What is the significance of relativistic electrons in the study of the universe?

Relativistic electrons play a crucial role in the study of the universe, as they are responsible for many observable phenomena, such as synchrotron radiation, cosmic rays, and the aurora borealis. Studying the behavior of these electrons can provide insights into the structure and evolution of the universe.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
851
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
786
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
225
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top