Proportional Segments Theorem

In summary: Try this link:In summary, Scott's argument uses trigonometry (the law of sines) to demonstrate that the sides of congruent triangles are proportional.
  • #1
noowutah
57
3
I remember learning this in high school, but I can't track down a proof. Let ABC be a triangle and DE a line segment intersecting the triangle such that D is on AB, E is on AC, and DE is parallel to BC. Then

[tex]\frac{\overline{DE}}{\overline{BC}}=\frac{\overline{AD}}{\overline{AB}}=\frac{\overline{AE}}{\overline{AC}}[/tex]

I duckduckgo'd this as much as I could, but no luck. There is a claim for a proof here

http://ceemrr.com/Geometry1/ParallelSimilar/ParallelSimilar_print.html

and I get the proof for the Triangle Midsegment Theorem, but I don't know what they mean when they say that the Proportional Segments Theorem follows from the Triangle Midsegment Theorem by "repeated application." How so?
 
  • Like
Likes favour_iyanu
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You can demonstrate that the two triangles are similar based on AAA (angle, angle, angle) - they share one angle and the parallel side can be used to prove the other two angle are equivalent.

The lengths of corresponding sides of similar triangles follow the same proportions.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #3
True. But say I can't use trigonometry (Pythagoras is OK) -- how do you show that the sides of congruent triangles are proportional? In my case below, it would be ideal to show that the rectangle with the sides DE and AB equals in area the rectangle with the sides BC and AD. For the theorem of Pythagoras, there is an elegant proof that the square c^2 equals the sum of the two squares a^2 and b^2. Similarly, for the Triangle Midsegment Theorem (see the link above). I don't see anything like that for the Proportional Segments Theorem, except an appeal to intuition.
 
  • #4
stlukits said:
But say I can't use trigonometry (Pythagoras is OK) --
O...K... ?!?
stlukits said:
how do you show that the sides of congruent triangles are proportional?
Am I allowed to used analytical geometry? That would give me the "Law of Sines".
stlukits said:
In my case below, it would be ideal to show that the rectangle with the sides DE and AB equals in area the rectangle with the sides BC and AD.
Once you use the Law of Sines to prove the lengths of the corresponding sides are proportional, this would be a simple next step or two.
 
  • #5
.Scott said:
You can demonstrate that the two triangles are similar based on AAA (angle, angle, angle) - they share one angle and the parallel side can be used to prove the other two angle are equivalent.

The lengths of corresponding sides of similar triangles follow the same proportions.

stlukits said:
True. But say I can't use trigonometry (Pythagoras is OK) -- how do you show that the sides of congruent triangles are proportional? In my case below, it would be ideal to show that the rectangle with the sides DE and AB equals in area the rectangle with the sides BC and AD. For the theorem of Pythagoras, there is an elegant proof that the square c^2 equals the sum of the two squares a^2 and b^2. Similarly, for the Triangle Midsegment Theorem (see the link above). I don't see anything like that for the Proportional Segments Theorem, except an appeal to intuition.
What .Scott is suggesting is not trigonometry - it's plain old geometry. Since DE || BC, ∠ABC = ∠ADE (corresponding angles of parallel lines cut by a transversal). Exactly the same argument can be made to show that ∠AED = ∠ACB. This shows that the three angles of the smaller triangle are congruent to the corresponding angles of the larger triangle - this the triangles are similar.

Regarding this question -- "how do you show that the sides of congruent triangles are proportional" The corresponding sides of congruent triangles are equal in length, so technically they are proportional, with the proportion being 1. Perhaps you meant "sides of similar triangles" instead.
 
  • #6
Yes, pardon me, I meant similar triangles, not congruent triangles. And no, I don't want to refer to the law of sines for a proof. My question is if I can show by a plain geometrical argument that makes sense to a 12-year old (no trigonometry) that the sides of similar (!) triangles are proportional. There are such plain geometrical arguments for the Theorem of Pythagoras and for the Triangle Midsegment Theorem. I as yet can't think of one for the Proportional Segments Theorem without recourse to trigonometry.

Mentor's argument only shows me that the two triangles are similar, but not that their sides are proportional. Scott's argument uses trigonometry (the law of sines). By "OK" I mean it's OK to use P.'s theorem in your proof, but please no trig.
 
  • #7
stlukits said:
Yes, pardon me, I meant similar triangles, not congruent triangles. And no, I don't want to refer to the law of sines for a proof. My question is if I can show by a plain geometrical argument that makes sense to a 12-year old (no trigonometry) that the sides of similar (!) triangles are proportional.

Would this 12-year old be stuck doing some homework?

Try this link:

http://www.mathopenref.com/similartriangles.html

If you google 'similar triangles', you can find other similar (no pun intended) links.
 
  • #8
No, it's not homework. If it were, it appears that not only 12-year-olds, but also some physicists on physicsforums.com would be stumped, including me :)

The website you are linking to (I found it earlier as well) does a great job appealing to our intuition, but the proof is still missing. Again, one thing that would satisfy me is if you could show me that the rectangle with the sides DE and AB equals in area the rectangle with the sides BC and AD.
 
  • #9
It's been a long, long time since I took geometry in 10th grade, but I believe there was a theorem that said that similar triangles have sides that are proportional in the same ratio. Being a geometry book, it would not have used trigonometry to reach this result. Off the top of my head I don't remember how it was done.
 
  • #10
I am beginning to think that this isn't so easy ...
 
  • #12
Brilliant. That's it. And not so easy ...
 

What is the Proportional Segments Theorem?

The Proportional Segments Theorem, also known as the Midpoint Theorem, states that if a line segment is divided into two equal parts by a midpoint, then the two smaller segments formed are proportional to the original segment and to each other.

What is the formula for the Proportional Segments Theorem?

The formula for the Proportional Segments Theorem is AB/AC = AD/AE, where A is the midpoint of segment BC and D and E are points on segment AB and AC, respectively.

How is the Proportional Segments Theorem used in real life?

The Proportional Segments Theorem is commonly used in fields such as architecture and engineering to ensure that structures are built with equal proportions and balance. It is also used in mapmaking to accurately scale down distances.

Can the Proportional Segments Theorem be applied to non-right triangles?

Yes, the Proportional Segments Theorem can be applied to any triangle, whether it is right or not. As long as a midpoint is created, the theorem can be used to determine proportional segments.

Are there any other theorems related to the Proportional Segments Theorem?

Yes, the Proportional Segments Theorem is closely related to the Triangle Proportionality Theorem, which states that if a line is drawn parallel to one side of a triangle and intersects the other two sides, then it divides those two sides proportionally.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
729
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
630
  • General Math
Replies
4
Views
749
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top