Register to reply

Why EM and weak interaction are unified

by karlzr
Tags: interaction, unified, weak
Share this thread:
karlzr
#1
Apr10-14, 12:57 AM
P: 86
In SM, people say the ##SU(2)\otimes U(1)## theory unify the EM and weak interaction. I understand that the two interactions both originate from the electroweak theory in a mixed way. But does this mean they are unified? Since when we talk about unification like GUT, we require the couplings run to the same value at a high unification scale. I don't see it in electroweak theory. So how should we interpret the difference?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Optimum inertial self-propulsion design for snowman-like nanorobot
The Quantum Cheshire Cat: Can neutrons be located at a different place than their own spin?
A transistor-like amplifier for single photons
The_Duck
#2
Apr10-14, 11:29 AM
P: 844
Yes, you can justifiably complain that the electroweak theory does not really unify anything since it still has two independent gauge groups, SU(2) and U(1), with independent couplings. Ideally we might have hoped that both forces would arise from a single gauge group. GUTs are more ambitious and seek to derive the SU(3), SU(2), and U(1) of the Standard Model from a single gauge group.
clem
#3
Apr10-14, 12:35 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 1,256
The weak and EM couplings are the same alpha=1/137. However the weak interaction depends on
alpha/(M_W^2+Q^2), while EM is alpha/Q^2, so the weak looks weak at low energies.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Strong interaction and unified field theory Quantum Physics 1
Weak interaction Quantum Physics 5
Weak Interaction Guidance Advanced Physics Homework 2
Weak interaction High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 3
Weak interaction High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 4