Hen Precedes Egg, Mother Precedes Infant

  • Thread starter coberst
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Egg
In summary, the conversation discusses the relationship between the hen and the egg, mother and infant, and the cycle of renewal in society through the impulses of the young generation. It also explores the question of which came first, the chicken or the egg, and the concept of education as a means of directing the impulses of the young towards improving society. Ultimately, it concludes that the egg comes before the chicken in terms of evolution and that the younger generation plays a crucial role in shaping society.
  • #1
coberst
306
0
Hen Precedes Egg, Mother Precedes Infant

While the hen and the mother precedes in time the egg and the infant, the egg and the infant are the means for changing the natures of future hens and future mothers.

A human impulse such as fear can result in a sadistic act, or altruism, or despair, or hope all depending upon the social environment and the preformed habits of the individual. A wo/man may fear or revere the spirit of ancestors; they may fear or revere authority. “The actual outcome depends upon how the impulse of fear is interwoven with other impulses. This depends in turn on the outlets and inhibitions supplied by the social environment.”

Whether we are speaking of generation X or Y, or the great or the millennial generation, each generation represents renewal with all of its potential and all of its disappointments. The species is constantly being renewed for good or for bad; all this ‘just happens’ without conscious intention. Everyone is just trying to get along.

The young new generation makes continuous alteration in the society even though these alterations are unintended, they just kind of follow surreptitiously from accidental happenings. With the dawn of the idea that one can make improvements in society based upon channeling the impulses of the young, new social institutions were born. Education was to become the means for directing the impulses of the young in directions that would slowly modify the present society into more useful modes.

Such is the meaning of education; “for a truly humane education consists in an intelligent direction of native activities in the light of the possibilities and necessities of the social situation. But for the most part, adults have given training rather than education…The younger generation has hardly even knocked frankly at the door of adult customs, much less been invited into rectify through better education the brutalities and inequities established in adult habit…Each generation has crept blindly and furtively through such chance gaps as have happened to be left open.”

Quotes from “Human Nature and Conduct” by John Dewey first printed in 1922
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The egg actually came before the chicken. Since a chicken resulted from some mutation on some already existing animal, at some point the egg was laid by something which can be classified as non-chicken, and out of the egg came a chicken. Depending where exactly you draw the line between chicken and non-chicken, depends how far back in time you need to go. Wherever you draw this line, the egg still comes before the chicken.
 
  • #3
NeoDevin said:
The egg actually came before the chicken. Since a chicken resulted from some mutation on some already existing animal, at some point the egg was laid by something which can be classified as non-chicken, and out of the egg came a chicken. Depending where exactly you draw the line between chicken and non-chicken, depends how far back in time you need to go. Wherever you draw this line, the egg still comes before the chicken.

Ahh. the egg only came before the chicken one generation(the very first time) everytime after that I'm relatively certain the chicken came first. I see the question of "Which came first the chicken or the egg?" as flawed. Mainly because the chicken came through mutation and natural selection. If the question was "Which came first? The egg-layer? or the egg itself?" Then my first reaction would be "the egg-layer" because it seems almost tooo obvious.

However let us think for a moment and say..can you define the "egg-layer" as a singular species? If you can..then the egg comes first. If you can't the egg-layer comes first.

Unless eggs just popped into reality from nothingness...then me posting any of this would be rather pointless.
 
  • #4
NeoDevin said:
Wherever you draw this line, the egg still comes before the chicken.

That is exactly right. The egg comes before the chicken, because there is one stage back in the past where the ancestor of the chicken must officially be called a 'chicken'. And that officially named 'chicken' comes from an egg.
 

What is the meaning of "Hen Precedes Egg, Mother Precedes Infant"?

"Hen Precedes Egg, Mother Precedes Infant" is a phrase that refers to the concept of causality or cause and effect. It suggests that in nature, certain things must come before others in order for them to exist or occur. Specifically, it relates to the idea that a hen, or female chicken, must exist before an egg can be laid, just as a mother must exist before an infant can be born.

Is there scientific evidence to support "Hen Precedes Egg, Mother Precedes Infant"?

Yes, there is scientific evidence to support this concept. In biology, it is well established that animals must exist before they can reproduce and give birth to offspring. In the case of chickens, hens are necessary for the fertilization and development of eggs, which then hatch into new chicks. Similarly, mothers must exist before they can give birth to infants in all mammalian species.

How does "Hen Precedes Egg, Mother Precedes Infant" relate to the theory of evolution?

"Hen Precedes Egg, Mother Precedes Infant" is closely related to the theory of evolution, as it demonstrates the concept of natural selection and adaptation. It suggests that certain traits or characteristics must exist in a species before they can pass them on to their offspring. In the case of chickens, hens with certain desirable traits, such as strong egg-laying abilities, are more likely to pass on those traits to their offspring, leading to the evolution of the species over time.

Can "Hen Precedes Egg, Mother Precedes Infant" be applied to human beings?

Yes, "Hen Precedes Egg, Mother Precedes Infant" can be applied to human beings. In fact, it is a fundamental aspect of human reproduction. A woman must exist before she can give birth to a child, just as a mother must exist before she can give birth to an infant. This concept also applies to the passing on of genetic traits and characteristics from parents to their children.

Are there any exceptions to "Hen Precedes Egg, Mother Precedes Infant" in nature?

While "Hen Precedes Egg, Mother Precedes Infant" is generally true in nature, there are a few exceptions. For example, in some species of fish, male fish carry and fertilize eggs, so the concept may not apply in the same way. Additionally, in certain cases, such as with some species of insects, individuals can reproduce asexually without the need for a mate. However, these exceptions do not disprove the overall concept of causality and the importance of parent organisms in the reproduction and development of offspring.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
969
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
43
Views
13K
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
8K
Back
Top