Computing the period of a meteor using two ways.

In summary, the conversation discusses two ways of computing the period of a meteor orbit using different approaches. The first approach involves using the semi-major axis and the standard gravitational constant, while the second approach involves using the solar gravitational parameter. The discrepancy between the results is due to using the gravitational parameter for the Earth instead of the Sun. The conversation also mentions the importance of using consistent units and the limitations of the equations used in calculating orbital periods.
  • #1
solarblast
152
2
Computing the period of a meteor using two ways.

I'm looking at code that computes the orbit found for a meteor. It computes the period of the meteor as:

a = 13.07 # semi-major axis in AU
P = m.sqrt(a*a*a) # From the program

which yields P = 47.2512586393 Years

If I use the "standard" approach

P = 2*pi*m.sqrt((a*a*a)/mu),

where mu (=GM) is the standard gravitational constant (G*M or GM).
3986004418.0 in km**3/sec**2,

then I get:

P = 703462.683141 # units?

They certainly don't look close. A source I'm looking at says 4*pi*pi/G = 1, but they are talking about solar masses.

So why the large discrepancy? Units?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
It is always a good idea to use the right constants and consistent units.

You are using the gravitational parameter for the Earth, not the Sun. The solar gravitational parameter is 1.327124400180×1011 km3/s2. To have consistent units, you need to either convert that 13.07 AU to kilometers or convert the gravitational parameter to AU3/year2.

With the first technique, convert that 13.07 AU to 1.955244×109 km. Then
[itex]T = 2\pi\sqrt{a^3/\mu_{\odot}} \approx 1.49116\times10^9[/itex] seconds, or 47.25 sidereal years ( = 47.28 years).

With the second technique, it's very handy to fold that factor of 2*pi into the square root. With this, the sun's gravitational parameter divided by 4*pi^2 is [itex]u_{\odot}' = 0.999997054[/itex] AU3/sidereal year2. Note that this is numerically equal to one to six places. This is what let's you get away with using [itex]T=\sqrt{a3}[/itex].
 
Last edited:
  • #3
D H said:
It is always a good idea to use the right constants and consistent units.

You are using the gravitational parameter for the Earth, not the Sun. The solar gravitational parameter is 1.327124400180×1011 km3/s2. To have consistent units, you need to either convert that 13.07 AU to kilometers or convert the gravitational parameter to AU3/year2.

With the first technique, convert that 13.07 AU to 1.955244×109 km. Then
[itex]T = 2\pi\sqrt{a^3/\mu_{\odot}} \approx 1.49116\times10^9[/itex] seconds, or 47.25 sidereal years ( = 47.28 years).

With the second technique, it's very handy to fold that factor of 2*pi into the square root. With this, the sun's gravitational parameter divided by 4*pi^2 is [itex]u_{\odot}' = 0.999997054[/itex] AU3/sidereal year2. Note that this is numerically equal to one to six places. This is what let's you get away with using [itex]T=\sqrt{a3}[/itex].

They certainly don't look close. A source I'm looking at says 4*pi*pi/G = 1, but they are talking about solar masses.

So why the large discrepancy? Units?[/QUOTE]

Well, your certainly right about the units and the earth. I was using material I found on the web, and often it was unit-less. The book the computer program on never mentions how to compute P, but it's certainly in the code.

Thanks very much.
 
  • #4
Well, not all worked out. Something is wrong. Here's a Python program and output.

import math as m

GMsun = 13271244018.0 # km**3/sec**-2
Gsun = 6.67834*(10**-11)

GMearth = 398600.4418 # km**3/sec**-2
Rearth = 6378140.0 # radius of Earth in km
SunToEarth = 149597870.7 #km
EarthMass = GMearth = 3986004418.0 # km**3/sec**-2
EarthMass = 5.9742*10**24

sidereal_year = 31558149.8 # sec
AU = 149598000.0 # KM per AU

pi = 3.14152965


#
print "Meteor Period"

mu = GMsun/(4*pi*pi)

a = 13.07*AU
a1 =13.07
P = (2.0*pi*m.sqrt((a*a*a)/mu)) / sidereal_year # Web
Pbook = m.sqrt(a1*a1*a1) # Wray book
print "P: ", P, " and Book: ",Pbook

print "Check for mu_sun: ", mu

=================
Meteor Period
P: 938.808534723 and Book: 47.2512586393 <---P from code is way off
Check for mu_sun: 336178021.818
 
  • #5
To put a close to this, I have no idea why P = (2.0*pi*m.sqrt((a*a*a)/mu)) is useful. As it happens p^2/a^3 = 1 for all objects in orbit around the sun, planets anyway. So once you have a, the period is determine by the sqrt of a^3.
 
  • #6
solarblast said:
To put a close to this, I have no idea why P = (2.0*pi*m.sqrt((a*a*a)/mu)) is useful. As it happens p^2/a^3 = 1 for all objects in orbit around the sun, planets anyway. So once you have a, the period is determine by the sqrt of a^3.
The expression T^2 = A^3 is valid only for orbits around the Sun, only for objects much less massive than the Sun, and only if you express time in sidereal years, distance in AU, and only if you don't care that the result is only good to a few decimal places.
 
  • #7
And the value of the other equation is what?
 
  • #8
The other formula can be used to calculate the period of a satellite's orbit about the Earth. Or about Jupiter. Or the period of an exoplanet about some other star. And so on.
 
  • #9
Ah, thanks. Why is that true though?
 
Last edited:

1. How is the period of a meteor calculated?

The period of a meteor can be calculated using two methods: Kepler's Third Law and Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation. Both methods involve using the mass and distance of the meteor from the planet it is orbiting to determine its period.

2. What is Kepler's Third Law?

Kepler's Third Law states that the square of a planet's orbital period is proportional to the cube of its average distance from the sun. This law can also be applied to calculate the period of a meteor orbiting a planet.

3. How does Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation help in computing the period of a meteor?

Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation states that the force of gravity between two objects is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. By using this law, we can determine the period of a meteor based on its mass and distance from the planet it is orbiting.

4. Is one method more accurate than the other in calculating the period of a meteor?

Both methods are equally accurate in calculating the period of a meteor. However, Kepler's Third Law is more commonly used as it is easier to apply and requires less complex calculations.

5. Can the period of a meteor change over time?

Yes, the period of a meteor can change over time due to factors such as changes in its mass, the gravitational pull of other celestial bodies, and external forces acting on it. This is why it is important to regularly recalculate the period of a meteor to ensure accuracy.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
701
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
790
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
3
Replies
80
Views
4K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
767
  • Classical Physics
Replies
0
Views
131
Back
Top