- #1
kote
- 867
- 4
According to http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0103041, particles cannot possibly be the fundamental elements of reality. Are you aware of any newer related papers? Does this conclusion seem to make sense?
I can't find any reason not to buy it - it seems to follow pretty naturally from nonrelativistic QM already. What's your take? Are particles just useful macroscopic approximations?
I can't find any reason not to buy it - it seems to follow pretty naturally from nonrelativistic QM already. What's your take? Are particles just useful macroscopic approximations?