What is the physical/geometric meaning of spacelike, timelike and null

  • Thread starter Ranku
  • Start date
In summary, spacelike geodesics describe straight lines in any inertial frame, while timelike and null geodesics describe different paths depending on the object's mass. Spacelike geodesics have no practical relevance to general relativity, but they are important in some theories of faster-than-light travel.
  • #1
Ranku
410
18
What is the physical/geometric meaning of spacelike, timelike and null geodesics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Ranku said:
What is the physical/geometric meaning of spacelike, timelike and null geodesics?

All objects with mass move on timelike geodesics, massless objects move on null geodesics, and nothing can move on spacelike geodesics since that would mean moving faster than the speed of light.
 
  • #3


Amanheis said:
nothing can move on spacelike geodesics since that would mean moving faster than the speed of light.

So what then is the practical relevance of spacelike geodesics to general relativity?
 
  • #4


Ranku said:
So what then is the practical relevance of spacelike geodesics to general relativity?

I can't think of any
 
  • #5


Ranku said:
So what then is the practical relevance of spacelike geodesics to general relativity?

Locally, they are usually known as "straight lines".

If points on the geodesic are at the same time coordinate, they describe straight lines in the observer's own frame. If they are not at the same time coordinate, they describe straight lines in some other inertial frame.
 
Last edited:
  • #6


For some additional comments see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geodesic_(general_relativity )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7


Ranku said:
So what then is the practical relevance of spacelike geodesics to general relativity?

They have no physical usage in any branch of physics but in the FTL theories which lean upon a premise that says there are particles that can be accelerated in such a way that their speed would be able to pass the speed of light! An example could be tachyons. The reason why such particles follow spacelike geodesics is that since they have tremendously ultra-higher speeds than [tex]c[/tex], so an interval in space is traveled by them in a very tiny interval of time, letting the line-element [tex]ds^2[/tex] be smaller than zero.

AB
 
  • #8


Spacelike geodesics are commonly used in defining distances between two timelike worldlines (such as particle trajectories), constructing hypersurfaces "of constant time," etc.
 
  • #9


Thank you all...:cool:
 

What is the physical/geometric meaning of spacelike?

The physical/geometric meaning of spacelike refers to a type of spacetime interval in which the distance between two events is greater than the time interval. This means that the events are separated by a spatial distance and cannot affect each other causally.

What is the physical/geometric meaning of timelike?

The physical/geometric meaning of timelike refers to a type of spacetime interval in which the time interval between two events is greater than the spatial distance. This means that the events are separated by a temporal distance and can potentially affect each other causally.

What is the physical/geometric meaning of null?

The physical/geometric meaning of null refers to a type of spacetime interval in which the distance between two events is equal to the time interval. This means that the events are separated by a light-like distance and can potentially affect each other causally, but only through the exchange of light signals.

How do spacelike, timelike, and null intervals relate to the speed of light?

Spacelike intervals are greater than the speed of light, timelike intervals are less than the speed of light, and null intervals are equal to the speed of light. This is because the speed of light is a universal constant that defines the maximum speed at which information and causality can propagate through spacetime.

What are the implications of spacelike, timelike, and null intervals for causality?

Spacelike intervals imply that events are not causally connected and cannot affect each other. Timelike intervals imply that events can potentially affect each other causally. Null intervals imply that events can potentially affect each other causally, but only through the exchange of light signals. These distinctions are important in understanding the causal relationships between events in spacetime.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
65
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
722
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
886
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
67
Views
4K
Back
Top