Understanding the Manhattan Project: Questions about the Bombs

  • Thread starter Jeebus
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Project
In summary: When the bomb eventually explodes, is the fission controlled or is controlled nuclear fission only used for testing in labs and stuff?The bomb explodes.
  • #1
Jeebus
255
0
I'm doing a report on the Manhattan Project and there are a few things I don't understand about the bombs.
(1) In the Uranium model (Little Boy), there are two separate containers of Uranium. They get shot together and attain supercritical mass. Looking at the diagram on this page:http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/neutronics/todd/nuc.bomb.html#IV.A [Broken], I don't see where the neutron initiator is in the Uranium model. If I'm not mistaken, once supercritical mass is achieved, there's still needs to be a neutron initiator to get the chain reaction going.
(2) There's also talk about how the two Uranium pieces needed to brought together quick enough so that spontaneous fission doesn't occur and fizzle the bomb out. I don't understand why the period of time where the one piece is shot into the other is particularly susceptible to spontaneous fission. Wouldn't spontaneous fission be possible in the plane ride up there and where it was being stored in the first place?
(3) At what level are each of the two Uranium pieces at while they're separated (not yet critical, critical...)?
(4) How come neutrons that are reflected back from the neutron deflector in either the Uranium or the Plutonium models don't bring about a premature fission?
(5) When the bomb eventually explodes, is the fission controlled or is controlled nuclear fission only used for testing in labs and stuff?
(6) Why are neutron initiators needed in the first place? Why not just successfully get the fissionable material to supercritical mass and then spontaneous fission set off the chain reaction?

I'm a little confused. Thanks!
(...and sorry if this is the wrong forum.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
1. The gun barrel barrel type bomb didn't need a neutron source because, unlike Plutonium, Uranium can fission without the need of a nuetron initiator.
2. I think the U-238 neutron shield was used for just such a reason; to prevent accidential spontaneous fission (the fizzle kind, not an all out explosion). Supercritical mass is needed to make the now one piece (due to the fusing of both peices of uranium) fission uncontrollably
3. Both pieces are sub-critical, put them together and they are critical but not uncontrollable. If fused together quickly, they are supercritical...I think...
4. I don't know about this one.
5. The fission of an atomic bomb is uncontrolled. Controlled fission is used in nuclear power plants.
6. You don't have initiators with Uranium bombs. But Plutonium doesn't have fast enough neutrons to initiate a reaction on its own so it needs a neutron source that gives off faster neutrons.

It's not everything but I hope it helps.
 
  • #3
Originally posted by Jeebus
(1) In the Uranium model (Little Boy), there are two separate containers of Uranium. They get shot together and attain supercritical mass. Looking at the diagram on this page:http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/neutronics/todd/nuc.bomb.html#IV.A [Broken], I don't see where the neutron initiator is in the Uranium model. If I'm not mistaken, once supercritical mass is achieved, there's still needs to be a neutron initiator to get the chain reaction going.[/b]

While I do not think a gun barrel bomb requires an initiator, one would help jumpstart the chain reaction.

(2) There's also talk about how the two Uranium pieces needed to brought together quick enough so that spontaneous fission doesn't occur and fizzle the bomb out. I don't understand why the period of time where the one piece is shot into the other is particularly susceptible to spontaneous fission. Wouldn't spontaneous fission be possible in the plane ride up there and where it was being stored in the first place?

What you want to avoid is a (relatively) slow collision between the subcritical components. Otherwise the incomplete fission would reduce the explosive yield. What they mean by spontaneous fission is an explosion triggered by neutrons from spontaneous fission (rather than an initiator). This would reduce the fission mass confinement before an acceptable level of chain reaction has been completed.

If the masses aren't close enough, the early chain reaction will generate enough heat and explosive force to separate the unreacted uranium, thus choking off the exponential progression of the chain reaction. With the mass in a smaller volume, the exponential progression proceeds at a faster rate. This allows for less required fissionable material for a given explosive yield.

This problem is so pronouced in plutonium type bombs that implosion of a sphere of plutonium is the only way to get the required mass into the critical volume fast enough to prevent a fizzled explosion.


(3) At what level are each of the two Uranium pieces at while they're separated (not yet critical, critical...)?

I presume by level you mean subcritical, critical, supercritical.

Subcritical is the answer.

(4) How come neutrons that are reflected back from the neutron deflector in either the Uranium or the Plutonium models don't bring about a premature fission?

Reflectors aren't perfect reflectors, even if they were, the lack of critical mass would mean the number of neutrons present wouldn't be enough tip the chain reaction into the required exponential curve.

Reasons for reflectors:

Think about a fission based explosion in terms of exponential chain reaction - each neutron triggering two more neutrons, in an exponential progression.

Now, realize that many of the neutrons will not hit another nucleus, thus be wasted. The more material they have to travel thru the higher the chance of colliding with another nucleus. The more fissionable material you can get into a fixed volume, the higher the chance that a neutron will hit another nucleus, rather than escape. Using a reflector (U238/Lead), will enable you to get a second chance with the neutrons that have left the fissionable mass, by reflecting them back into the fissionable mass. This will reduce the critical mass needed for a successful nuclear explosion.

A second benefit of reflectors is to confinement. The mass of the reflector helps keep the fissionable material in a more confined space, until the exponential progression has exhaused most fissionable fuel.



(5) When the bomb eventually explodes, is the fission controlled or is controlled nuclear fission only used for testing in labs and stuff?

Define controlled.

The bombmaker would consider the exponential chain reaction, such that the majority of the fissionable material is converted into chain reaction breakdown products, giving a maximum energy yield, to be controlled.

A nuclear reactor officer on a sub would consider an exponential chain reaction a very bad thing, therefore uncontrolled.


(6) Why are neutron initiators needed in the first place? Why not just successfully get the fissionable material to supercritical mass and then spontaneous fission set off the chain reaction?

More efficient use of fissionable material - exponential reaction rates (first derivative) are slow, at first (relatively), progressing to more and more rapid. Since slow reactions can cause the fissionable material lose confinement (due to explosively dissipation) before the exponential progression has consumed an acceptable amount of the fissionable material, this is undesireable.
What the initiator does is start the reaction a little further along the exponential curve, into the more rapid portion of the reaction. This allows for less required fissionable material for a given explosive yield.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
In the context of fission (reactors or bombs), mu is the average number of neutrons per fission.

Added note, I thought is was nu, not mu.
 
  • #5
If you are referring to my tagline, the question (koan) is about a thousand years old, so the context is probably not nuclear physics.
 

1. How did the Manhattan Project begin?

The Manhattan Project began in 1939 when a group of scientists, including Albert Einstein, warned President Franklin D. Roosevelt about the potential development of nuclear weapons by Nazi Germany. This led to the creation of the United States' own nuclear weapons program.

2. What was the purpose of the Manhattan Project?

The purpose of the Manhattan Project was to develop nuclear weapons for use in World War II. The United States wanted to be the first country to possess this powerful weapon and believed it would help them win the war.

3. Who were the key scientists involved in the Manhattan Project?

The key scientists involved in the Manhattan Project included Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and Leslie Groves. Many other scientists and engineers also played important roles in the project.

4. How did the atomic bombs work?

The two atomic bombs developed by the Manhattan Project, code-named "Little Boy" and "Fat Man", used nuclear fission to create a massive explosion. This process involves splitting the nuclei of atoms, releasing a huge amount of energy in the form of heat, light, and radiation.

5. What were the consequences of dropping the atomic bombs on Japan?

The atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan caused massive destruction and loss of life. It is estimated that over 200,000 people were killed, and many more were injured. The bombings also led to Japan's surrender and the end of World War II, but also sparked debates and controversy over the use and ethics of nuclear weapons.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
705
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
46
Views
12K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top