The selfish biocosm

[PIT2]

http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/9059/biocosmfrontcover3fw.jpg

The Selfish Biocosm hypothesis

The essence of the Selfish Biocosm hypothesis is that the universe we inhabit is in the process of becoming pervaded with increasingly intelligent life—but not necessarily human or even human-successor life. Under the theory, the emergence of life and increasingly competent intelligence are not meaningless accidents in a hostile, largely lifeless cosmos but at the very heart of the vast machinery of creation, cosmological evolution, and cosmic replication. However, the theory does not require or even suggest that the life and intelligence that emerge be human or human-successor in nature.

The hypothesis simply asserts that the peculiarly life-friendly laws and constants that prevail in our universe serve a function precisely equivalent to that of DNA in living creatures on Earth, providing a recipe for development and a blueprint for the construction of offspring.

Finally, the hypothesis implies that the capacity for the universe to generate life and to evolve ever more capable intelligence is encoded as a hidden subtext to the basic laws and constants of nature, stitched like the finest embroidery into the very fabric of our universe. A corollary—and a key falsifiable implication of the Selfish Biocosm theory—is that we are likely not alone in the universe but are probably part of a vast, yet undiscovered transterrestrial community of lives and intelligences spread across billions of galaxies and countless parsecs. Under the theory, we share a possible common fate with that hypothesized community—to help shape the future of the universe and transform it from a collection of lifeless atoms into a vast, transcendent mind.

The inescapable implication of the Selfish Biocosm hypothesis is that the immense saga of biological evolution on Earth is one tiny chapter in an ageless tale of the struggle of the creative force of life against the disintegrative acid of entropy, of emergent order against encroaching chaos, and ultimately of the heroic power of mind against the brute intransigence of lifeless matter.

http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0642.html

Another quote:

The conventional wisdom among evolutionary theorists, typified by the thinking of the late Stephen Jay Gould, is that the abstract probability of the emergence of anything like human intelligence through the natural process of biological evolution was vanishingly small. According to this viewpoint, the emergence of human-level intelligence was a staggeringly improbable contingent event. A few distinguished contrarians like Simon Conway Morris, Robert Wright, E. O. Wilson, and Christian de Duve take an opposing position, arguing on the basis of the pervasive phenomenon of convergent evolution and other evidence that the appearance of human-level intelligence was highly probable, if not virtually inevitable. The latter position is consistent with the Selfish Biocosm hypothesis while the Gould position is not.

Complete rubbish or a brilliant insight into the workings of the universe?

 

[Overdose]

Well i wouldn't say it was rubbish, then again id hardly say it was a brilliant insight either. Its really nothing i haven't mulled over myself on a lazy sunday afternoon such as this. :tongue:
Personally id say he's probably nearer the mark than assuming specified consciousness is some weird freak accident. I highly doubt it is, then again its all speculation at this point since we've not even begun to properly investigate other planets and we really have no idea how rare or how common life is.
Hmm i actually just realized something in writting that last line, everything is alive anyway, every particle every atom, i guess in that respect the whole universe is already alive. Planets, moons, stars, meteores - signs of life right in front of us.
What we're really talking about is when living matter groups together to form task driven entities with specialised awareness, as i said before how rare or how common an occurrence this is only time will tell.

 

[Architeuthis Dux]

I cannot definitively label this hypothesis as "complete rubbish" or a "brilliant insight." The Selfish Biocosm hypothesis presents an interesting perspective on the role of life and intelligence in the universe, and it certainly raises some thought-provoking questions. However, as with any scientific theory, it must be rigorously tested and supported by evidence before it can be accepted as a valid explanation for the workings of the universe.

One potential issue with this hypothesis is that it relies heavily on speculation and extrapolation, rather than concrete evidence. While the idea of a "transterrestrial community" and the role of life in shaping the future of the universe is intriguing, it is currently beyond the realm of scientific understanding. Additionally, the idea that the laws and constants of the universe are specifically designed to promote the emergence of life and intelligence is a controversial and still unproven concept.

On the other hand, the idea that human-level intelligence may not be a rare or improbable occurrence in the universe is supported by evidence of convergent evolution and the vastness of the cosmos. It is also important to note that the Selfish Biocosm hypothesis is not the only explanation for these phenomena, and it is possible that future research may uncover alternative explanations.

In conclusion, the Selfish Biocosm hypothesis presents a thought-provoking perspective on the role of life and intelligence in the universe. However, it is not yet supported by enough evidence to be considered a definitive explanation for the workings of the universe. As scientists, it is important for us to continue to explore and question these ideas, while also remaining open to alternative explanations and new evidence.