Quarks can form mini blackholes

In summary, physicist Paul Davies discusses the possibility of two quarks approaching each other closely enough to create a minuscule black hole. This is based on the assumption that the Standard Model, which treats quarks as pointlike particles, remains valid on a much smaller scale. However, the likelihood and implications of this phenomenon are uncertain and still being studied.
  • #1
robertjford80
388
0
this passage is from Paul Davies' the Last Three Minutes:

From time to time, two quarks will approach each other very closely. Still more rarely, all three quarks will find themselves in extremely close proximity. It is possible that the quarks will get so close that the gravitational force between them, normally utterly negligible, will overwhelm all else. If this happens, the quarks will fall together to make a minuscule black hole. In effect, the proton collapses under its own gravity by quantum-mechanical tunneling. The resulting minihole is highly unstable—recall the Hawking process—and more or less instantly vanishes, creating a positron. Estimates of the lifetime for proton decay via this route are very uncertain, and vary from 10 to the 45 years to a stupendous 10 to the 220 years

I have a very difficult time believing and understanding this. Why would two quarks being in close proximity create a black hole? A nucleus is only 3 orders of magnitude larger than a quark which i like mount everest compared to a human so i would think that quarks would approach each other a lot more often than 10^45 years. Second, when this black hole occurs, what happens to the neighboring protons? Just what is this black hole made of? Quarks?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
robertjford80, It's really embarrassing, what you apparently have to say these days to sell a popular science book. Note the word "Conjectures" in the title of this book, and believe me, that's an understatement.

A proton is about one fermi (10-13 cm) across. The size of a quark is unknown, experimentally smaller than 10-16 cm. Current theory, the Standard Model, treats it as pointlike, but that could change if and when the Standard Model is replaced by a deeper theory. Davies' conjecture is based on the assumption that the Standard Model remains valid for, oh about 30 orders of magnitude smaller. Quarks would have to remain pointlike to within this distance, and approach each other to where their gravitational attraction overwhelms the strong force.

Before this happens, all the air molecules in the room will jump into my pocket.
 

1. What are quarks?

Quarks are elementary particles that are the building blocks of matter. They are found in the nucleus of atoms and are one of the fundamental particles that make up the Standard Model of particle physics.

2. How can quarks form mini blackholes?

It is currently a theoretical possibility that if quarks are compressed to extremely high densities, they could potentially form mini blackholes due to the strong nuclear force between them. However, this has not been observed or proven yet.

3. Are mini blackholes formed by quarks dangerous?

There is no evidence to suggest that mini blackholes formed by quarks would be dangerous. In fact, due to their small size, they would likely evaporate quickly through Hawking radiation.

4. Can we create mini blackholes in particle accelerators?

No, current particle accelerators do not have enough energy to compress quarks to the densities required for blackhole formation. Even if they did, the blackholes would evaporate almost instantly due to Hawking radiation.

5. How does the formation of mini blackholes by quarks relate to the search for a theory of quantum gravity?

The possibility of mini blackholes forming from quarks is still a theoretical concept and has not been proven. However, if it were to be observed, it could provide insights into the behavior of matter at extremely high densities and potentially aid in the search for a theory of quantum gravity.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
44
Views
9K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
114
Views
5K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
35
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top