Who is in Charge of Math at Google?

  • Thread starter EternityMech
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Google
In summary, they also gave 2 instead of 288 on the infamous equation. Who works in the math department for Google? When I was young, I used scratch book instead of calculator to do math and now people use google instead of calculator to do math and now people use wolfram alpha instead of google to do math.
  • #1
EternityMech
95
0
they also gave 2 instead 288 on the infamous equation. who works in the math department for google?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
when i was young, i use scratch book instead of calculator to do math

and now people use google instead of calculator to do math
 
  • #3
when i was young, i use calculator instead of google to do math

and now people use wolfram alpha instead of google to do math
 
  • #4
What is the "infamous" equation?
 
  • #5
He probably means 48÷2(9+3). We shouldn't talk about it, though. :wink:
 
  • #6
I am as idiot as google. I thought zero to the power zero equaled one, too.
 
  • #7
neyzenyelda said:
I am as idiot as google. I thought zero to the power zero equaled one, too.

I could be very very wrong about this, but as I understand it, while 0^0 is technically undefined, it's often defined as 1 to simplify certain problems.
 
  • #8
Dembadon said:
He probably means 48÷2(9+3). We shouldn't talk about it, though. :wink:

It's 2. :biggrin:
 
  • #9
pergradus said:
It's 2. :biggrin:

No, it's not.

Please do not let this thread turn in another debate about 48÷2(9+3) or this thread will be locked.

See here for the "infamous equation": https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=494675
See here for [itex]0^0[/itex]: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=530207
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Wolframalpha is the the best resource out there for a lazy person who doesn't care about his math skills.

Yes, google can't be trusted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
has anyone read 'Stories of your life and others' by Ted Chiang?

one of the stories deals with 0/0
 
  • #12
dextercioby said:
Yes, google can't be trusted.
It has so many values for physical constants that are outdated or flat-out wrong. Avogadro's number, the astronomical unit, Newton's gravitational constant, pick one: It's probably wrong to some degree or another. For example, the google calculator value for the AU differs from the published value by 129 kilometers. The uncertainty in the published value is 3 meters.
 
  • #13
I'd rather use my [STRIKE]slid[/STRIKE] slide rule after hearing all of this. :)
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Not this crap again! :cry:
 
  • #15
dlgoff said:
I'd rather use my slid rule after hearing all of this. :)

*wonders of slid rule is the past tense of slide rule*
 
  • #16
lisab said:
*wonders of slid rule is the past tense of slide rule*
*wonders if of is future tense of if*
 
  • #17
Jimmy Snyder said:
*wonders if of is future tense of if*

:redface:
 
  • #18
dlgoff said:
I'd rather use my slid rule after hearing all of this. :)

My slide rule won't calculate 0^0, so it must be undefined.
 
  • #19
BobG said:
My slide rule won't calculate 0^0, so it must be undefined.
Dang. I've been looking for that Zero all day. Go figure.
 
  • #20
lisab said:
*wonders of slid rule is the past tense of slide rule*

dlgoff said:
I'd rather use my [STRIKE]slid[/STRIKE] slide rule after hearing all of this. :)

Notice my reason for editing. I just slid it back into its sheath.
 
  • #21
dextercioby said:
Wolframalpha is the the best resource out there for a lazy person who doesn't care about his math skills.

This is quite the judgment passed to people you don't even know!

I am not lazy, nor do I not care about my math skills. Yet, I use wolfram alpha all the time.
 
  • #22
KingNothing said:
This is quite the judgment passed to people you don't even know!

I am not lazy, nor do I not care about my math skills. Yet, I use wolfram alpha all the time.

You might have misunderstood my sentence. It doesn't apply to all people, but only to some of them.
 
  • #23
EternityMech said:
they also gave 2 instead 288 on the infamous equation. who works in the math department for google?

If you bang:
48/2(9+3)
Into google. It spits out 288. It even rewrites it so the 'maths grammar' is correct.

I DECLARE USER ERROR!

This thread can surely be solved by the user having a brain, and realising that you aren't using a sophisicated calculator. It's designed for idiots, adding things up.
 
Last edited:
  • #24
xxChrisxx said:
If you bang:
48/2(9+3)
Into google. It spits out 288. It even rewrites it so the 'maths grammar' is correct.

I DECLARE USER ERROR!

This thread can surely be solved by the user having a brain, and realising that you aren't using a sophisicated calculator. It's designed for idiots, adding things up.

thats cause they changed it, it gave 2 before.
 
  • #25
Thread closed for a bit...
 

1. Who is currently in charge of math at Google?

The current head of math at Google is Jeffrey Dean, who serves as a senior fellow and lead of the Google Brain team.

2. What are the qualifications for being in charge of math at Google?

Typically, the person in charge of math at Google has a strong background in mathematics and computer science. They also have experience working in industry and a proven track record of innovative research and development.

3. How does the person in charge of math at Google impact the company?

The person in charge of math at Google plays a crucial role in the development of Google's algorithms, products, and services. They lead teams of mathematicians and engineers to solve complex problems and improve the company's technology.

4. Is the person in charge of math at Google responsible for all math-related projects?

No, the person in charge of math at Google primarily focuses on research and development related to machine learning and artificial intelligence. Other math-related projects may be overseen by different teams or departments within Google.

5. How does Google ensure that the person in charge of math is qualified for their role?

Google has a rigorous hiring process for all employees, including those in leadership positions. The company looks for candidates with a strong academic background, relevant industry experience, and a passion for innovation and problem-solving.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
949
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
882
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
752
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top