- #36
lostprophets
- 28
- 0
there is more chance of this... P.S. To have a cat's chance in hell of coming up with a valid theory of your own
than me doing an experiment as i wouldn't no where to start and as I've said the tools are not at my disposal ...
but many thanks for your words. i will take them on board in my mind as it is my only tool on this.. abit like Newtons head with the apple...
as I've said i can only ask questions . the answers i receive i process's into pictures which lead to experiments in mind which lead to more question.this is where you come in.
so
can i ask again please.
the two slit experiment with the " spying eye".
has it been done with the "spy" behind the slit?
so the wave does not know its being looked at until its gone through the slit?
ive looked on line but can't find anything to say this as been done.
im sure it must have and just wanted to know if the outcome was the same as if the "spy" was at the front.
peace
than me doing an experiment as i wouldn't no where to start and as I've said the tools are not at my disposal ...
but many thanks for your words. i will take them on board in my mind as it is my only tool on this.. abit like Newtons head with the apple...
as I've said i can only ask questions . the answers i receive i process's into pictures which lead to experiments in mind which lead to more question.this is where you come in.
so
can i ask again please.
the two slit experiment with the " spying eye".
has it been done with the "spy" behind the slit?
so the wave does not know its being looked at until its gone through the slit?
ive looked on line but can't find anything to say this as been done.
im sure it must have and just wanted to know if the outcome was the same as if the "spy" was at the front.
peace