How to prove there is no Lebesgue number for open cover (1/n,1)?

  • Thread starter ramasamyg
  • Start date
In summary, a Lebesgue number is a positive real number that represents the largest possible radius of small open balls that can be used to cover a given set without any overlap. To prove that there is no Lebesgue number for a given set means to show that no matter how small the radius of the open balls used to cover the set is, there will always be some points in the set that are not covered by any ball. To prove that there is no Lebesgue number for a specific open cover, one must demonstrate that for any given positive real number, there exists at least one point in the set that is not covered by any open ball with that radius. The significance of proving that there is no Lebesgue number for
  • #1
ramasamyg
1
0
I am not sure how to prove there is no Lebesgue number for an open cover {(1/n,1)} of interval (0,1). If I take any element x of (0,1), it is inside any of the open set Ux = (1/n,1) of the open cover. So I am not sure how taking a ball of radius r around x is not contained in any Ux.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This should be easy. Do it the other way round.
Think about the subintervals of (0,1) that are not contained within (1/n,1).
 

1. What is a Lebesgue number?

A Lebesgue number is a positive real number that represents the largest possible radius of small open balls that can be used to cover a given set without any overlap.

2. What does it mean to prove there is no Lebesgue number?

To prove that there is no Lebesgue number for a given set means to show that no matter how small the radius of the open balls used to cover the set is, there will always be some points in the set that are not covered by any ball.

3. How do you prove that there is no Lebesgue number for a specific open cover?

To prove that there is no Lebesgue number for a specific open cover, you would need to show that for any given positive real number, there exists at least one point in the set that is not covered by any open ball with that radius.

4. What is the significance of proving there is no Lebesgue number for an open cover?

Proving that there is no Lebesgue number for an open cover is important because it means that the set cannot be covered by a finite number of open balls, which has implications in various areas of mathematics and science.

5. Is it possible to prove that there is no Lebesgue number for any open cover?

No, it is not possible to prove that there is no Lebesgue number for any open cover. This is because there are some sets that do have a Lebesgue number, and it is only necessary to prove the non-existence of a Lebesgue number for a specific set and open cover, not for all sets and covers.

Similar threads

  • Differential Geometry
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
314
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Calculus
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
333
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
573
Back
Top