Why is a deuteron an antisymmetric singlet in

In summary: I'd think the wavefunction would be:\psi(x_1,x_2)|\mbox{singlet or triplet}>|\uparrow \downarrow> where the spatial part doesn't necessarily have any type of symmetry on swapping x1 and x2, the spin state is some linear combination of the singlet and triplet state, and the isospin state has no type of symmetry on swapping the two arrows - the first particle (at x1) is a proton, and the second (at x2) is a neutron.
  • #1
RedX
970
3
Why is a deuteron an antisymmetric singlet in isospin:

[tex]|\uparrow\downarrow>-|\downarrow\uparrow>=|0,0> [/tex]

whereas a proton and neutron that are separated are a combination of an antisymmetric singlet and a symmetric triplet:

[tex]|\uparrow\downarrow>=|0,0>+|1,0> [/tex]

I don't understand the difference. Isn't a deuteron a neutron and a proton? (the spin up arrow stands for a proton state, and the spin down arrow a neutron state).

I read somewhere that a deuteron is antisymmetric in isospin because it is composed of two identical fermions so that the wavefunction needs to be antisymmetric! Since when was a proton identical to a neutron? And why doesn't that logic hold for a proton and a neutron that are separated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


The deuteron is a neutron and a proton in an S-state with parallel spins. The idea of isospin is that the neutron and proton are both the "same" particle in different isospin states. Being fermions, their overall wavefunction must be antisymmetric. But the wavefunction now consists of three parts: space, spin and isospin.

For the deuteron the space and spin parts are symmetric, hence the isospin part must be antisymmetric. The state in which the isospin part is symmetric would correspond to an antisymmetric spin part (antiparallel spins) but for a neutron and proton this state happens to be unbound.
 
  • #3


Bill_K said:
The deuteron is a neutron and a proton in an S-state with parallel spins. The idea of isospin is that the neutron and proton are both the "same" particle in different isospin states. Being fermions, their overall wavefunction must be antisymmetric. But the wavefunction now consists of three parts: space, spin and isospin.

For the deuteron the space and spin parts are symmetric, hence the isospin part must be antisymmetric. The state in which the isospin part is symmetric would correspond to an antisymmetric spin part (antiparallel spins) but for a neutron and proton this state happens to be unbound.

Thanks.

I was under the impression that the Pauli exclusion principle and antisymmetry only applies to indistinct particles. If one of the particles is slightly different than the other - however slight the difference - then they are distinct particles. So I don't think antisymmetry is a requirement. Yet that is what the notes I have say.

Now there is nothing wrong with having an antisymmetric wave function - even distinct particles can have an antisymmetric wave function - but it's just not required.

The neutron and the proton are distinct. If you have to apply antisymmetry and Pauli exclusion to them, then I think you have to show that particles that are very similar to each other, obey the Pauli exclusion principle too and antisymmetry. As far as I know, these are only requirements for particles that are exactly indistinct.

Also I'm not sure why this logic doesn't hold for a neutron and a proton that are not bound, but are both free in space. I'd think the wavefunction would be:

[tex]\psi(x_1,x_2)|\mbox{singlet or triplet}>|\uparrow \downarrow> [/tex]

where the spatial part doesn't necessarily have any type of symmetry on swapping x1 and x2, the spin state is some linear combination of the singlet and triplet state, and the isospin state has no type of symmetry on swapping the two arrows - the first particle (at x1) is a proton, and the second (at x2) is a neutron.

Now what is the difference between a proton and neutron that are widely separated, and a deuteron? I think the answer is in the spatial wavefunction:


[tex]\psi(x_1,x_2)|\mbox{singlet or triplet}>|\uparrow \downarrow> [/tex]

For a deuteron [tex]\psi(x_1,x_2)[/tex] vanishes when x1 is far from x2. But changing the spatial wavefunction doesn't change the spin or isospin states when you have a direct product. So by this logic, the deuteron should be the same wavefunction:

[tex]\psi(x_1,x_2)|\mbox{singlet or triplet}>|\uparrow \downarrow> [/tex]

except [tex]\psi(x_1,x_2) [/tex] will change to vanish outside [tex](x_1-x_2)^2 < r^2[/tex], where r is the spatial size of deuteron.

But obviously it's not, and deuteron is actually:

[tex]\psi_S(x_1,x_2)|\mbox{triplet}>|\uparrow \downarrow-\downarrow\uparrow > [/tex]

but I can't figure out why.
 
  • #4


RedX said:
I was under the impression that the Pauli exclusion principle and antisymmetry only applies to indistinct particles. If one of the particles is slightly different than the other - however slight the difference - then they are distinct particles. So I don't think antisymmetry is a requirement. Yet that is what the notes I have say.

Most certainly, the exclusion principle applies only to identical particles, and the proton and neutron are not identical. Never mind "slightly different", they ARE different. Isospin is a formalism for treating nonidentical particles. It's convenient, but not in any way fundamental. In place of Ψ = (space)(spin) you add an extra degree of freedom and consider Ψ = (space)(spin)(isospin). For a state which contains both a proton and a neutron, the actual wavefunction (space)(spin) can have either symmetry. So you tack on an isospin state which makes up for that, so that the overall (space)(spin)(isospin) is antisymmetric. Again, this is just formalism.

RedX said:
Also I'm not sure why this logic doesn't hold for a neutron and a proton that are not bound, but are both free in space.
It does. Isospin is used in scattering problems too.
 
  • #5


Note there are two relevant questions

1) When can you do it?
2) When is it useful?

It's important to keep the two issues separate. Only after you realize the answer to (1) is "always" -- only then should you consider (2)!
 

1. Why is a deuteron an antisymmetric singlet in nuclear physics?

A deuteron is an antisymmetric singlet in nuclear physics because it is composed of a proton and a neutron, which are both fermions. Fermions have a property called spin, which can either be "up" or "down." Since the deuteron is composed of two fermions, its total spin must be an antisymmetric combination of the individual spins. This results in the deuteron having a spin of 1, making it an antisymmetric singlet.

2. How does the antisymmetric nature of the deuteron affect its stability?

The antisymmetric nature of the deuteron plays a crucial role in its stability. Since it is an antisymmetric singlet, it is not affected by the strong nuclear force, which is responsible for binding the nucleus together. This makes the deuteron relatively stable compared to other particles with similar masses.

3. What is the significance of the deuteron's antisymmetric nature in nuclear reactions?

The antisymmetric nature of the deuteron is significant in nuclear reactions because it allows for the exchange of particles without violating the Pauli exclusion principle. This principle states that no two identical fermions can occupy the same quantum state simultaneously. Since the deuteron is an antisymmetric singlet, it can easily participate in nuclear reactions without violating this principle.

4. How does the deuteron's antisymmetric nature contribute to its role in nuclear fusion processes?

The deuteron's antisymmetric nature is crucial in nuclear fusion processes. In these reactions, two deuterons fuse together to form a helium-3 nucleus. This fusion process is only possible because the deuteron is an antisymmetric singlet, allowing for the exchange of particles without violating the Pauli exclusion principle.

5. Can the deuteron's antisymmetric nature be observed in experiments?

Yes, the deuteron's antisymmetric nature can be observed in experiments. One way to observe this is through experiments involving nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). In NMR, a magnetic field is applied to a sample containing deuterons, and the resulting spectrum shows the splitting of energy levels due to the deuteron's antisymmetric spin state. This confirms the antisymmetric nature of the deuteron and its role in nuclear physics.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top