Is the universe round or flat?

In summary: But, you are right, there are other models. In summary, there are several different models and theories about the shape and structure of the universe. Some suggest that it is flat, while others propose a spherical or even trumpet-like shape. However, there is still much that is unknown and unproven about the universe, and many of these theories are based on speculation and limited evidence.
  • #36
neginf said:
Does the universe's flatness mean that non Euclidean geometry isn't important in physics?

It is flat on average over very large scales. Locally it has curvature, we call that gravity and without it the Earth wouldn't orbit the Sun so yes, non-Euclidean geometry remains important.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #37
flat or round, spherical or trumpet - does the universe have a thickness ?
is it centrally thicker like 2 cymbals placed together ? how do we know if it is symmetrical ? is it getting thinner in the centre as it expands peripherally? why should it be symmetrical - was the singularity that preceded the big bang spinning in order to give it such symmetry ?
 
  • #38
urodoc said:
flat or round, spherical or trumpet - does the universe have a thickness ?
is it centrally thicker like 2 cymbals placed together ? how do we know if it is symmetrical ? is it getting thinner in the centre as it expands peripherally? why should it be symmetrical - was the singularity that preceded the big bang spinning in order to give it such symmetry ?

Urodoc, when people speak of the shape of the universe, they are speaking of a natural curvature that spacetime has over large distances. The universe doesn't have a 'shape' in the literal since, as it has no boundary.

Keep in mind that the expansion of the universe occurs everywhere at once. There is no center or boundary. Also, the universe is symmetrical because it underwent a period called 'inflation' in it's very early history. Inflation was an enormous expansion, of unimaginable magnitudes. It essentially functioned to 'iron out' any inhomogeneities in the early universe.
 
  • #39
GeorgeDishman said:
It is flat on average over very large scales. Locally it has curvature, we call that gravity and without it the Earth wouldn't orbit the Sun so yes, non-Euclidean geometry remains important.
Mark M said:
when people speak of the shape of the universe, they are speaking of a natural curvature that spacetime has over large distances.

When people talk about the curvature of the universe, they mean the curvature of space, not the curvature of spacetime. For example, in a flat FRW universe, space is Euclidean and flat, while spacetime is neither flat nor Euclidean.
 

Similar threads

Replies
54
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
9
Views
529
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
965
  • Cosmology
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
992
Back
Top