Special Relativity vs. Curled up spacial dimensions

In summary, according to the author, Special Relativity vs. "Curled up" spatial dimensions is a debate that has yet to be fully resolved. Special Relativity states that the familiar 3 spatial dimensions are curled up upon themselves, while Superstring Theory proposes an extra curled-up dimension. It is still unknown whether or not this extra dimension exists, and if it does, whether or not SR is possible in a space with this curled-up dimension.
  • #1
Zula110100100
253
0
Special Relativity vs. "Curled up" spatial dimensions

To be more specific I mean the 3 familiar spatial dimensions not extra ones(unless I guess they are large enough for SR to be effective). Anyway, I was reading a book on Superstring Theory(Which is why I say not extra ones it proposed extra culred dimensions which if were sub-planck length would not be detectable to us), I don't have it with me to cite to author, but it said it hasn't been proven or disproven that the familiar spatial dimensions are or are not curled upon themselves. And so in theory you could return at the same point by going to a straight line.

From what I know of SR and the constant motion clock examples two people with clocks floating in opposite directions through space would feel to be at rest with the other moving relative to them causing the slowing of time for each other but on a symmetrical basis so the paradox is negated due to the fact logistically it could not be compared accurately enough by either accelerating back causing the one accelerating to have agreed upon tile slowing, or a signal sent at light speed making up for the lag.

So if we had an empty path(No gravitational influence or at least negligible) through the universe that was curled upon itself the two clock would eventually meet back up, each observer expecting the other to be behind theirs and find the clocks reading the same time. Since SR has been proven in many instances this should either disprove the theory of curled up spatial dimensions in which SR is at play...or there is more I don't know as I am I would say amatuer at best.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF!

Hi Zula110100100! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Take a 3D version of the screen of the "Asteroids" video-game …

if you go off one edge, you immediately come back at the opposite edge.

This is a flat space, with only 3 dimensions, all curled-up.

So you're asking …
Zula110100100 said:
… two people with clocks floating in opposite directions through space …

So if we had an empty path(No gravitational influence or at least negligible) through the universe that was curled upon itself the two clock would eventually meet back up, each observer expecting the other to be behind theirs and find the clocks reading the same time. Since SR has been proven in many instances this should either disprove the theory of curled up spatial dimensions in which SR is at play...or there is more I don't know as I am I would say amatuer at best.

… would SR in such a space produce a paradox, thereby proving the impossibility of SR in such a space?

Seems plausible :rolleyes:

anyone else have any thoughts? :smile:
 
  • #4


atyy said:
The twin paradox in compact spaces
John D. Barrow, Janna Levin
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0101014
...
I was not aware of the Barrow Levin paper. It's a fascinating non-intuitive result.
Thanks for spotting it!

Here is a more recent paper that goes over similar ground and which I find in some respects easier to read:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0503070
Here the result is proven in the case where there one compact spatial dimension, as in a cylinder.
I still have a hard time believing the Barrow Levin claim that a compact spatial topology gives a preferred frame.

Maybe it depends on having the compact space be non-expanding. Could this be?

The paradox seems to arise when one or both make a full circuit along a geodesic. If space is compact and non-expanding this can happen. But in an expanding universe like ours, even if space is compact, one cannot circumnavigate. One cannot go fast enough. One would have to freeze the expansion in order to make a circuit.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
So two of those three papers show that, in a non-expanding 3D space with one curled-up dimension, you can have SR only if you have a preferred frame of reference.

Also Couolmb's law (1/r2 field from a point electric charge) is different.
marcus said:
The paradox seems to arise when one or both make a full circuit along a geodesic. If space is compact and non-expanding this can happen. But in an expanding universe like ours, even if space is compact, one cannot circumnavigate. One cannot go fast enough. One would have to freeze the expansion in order to make a circuit.

So before inflation in our universe, there was a preferred frame?
 
  • #6


Zula110100100 said:
To be more specific I mean the 3 familiar spatial dimensions not extra ones(unless I guess they are large enough for SR to be effective). Anyway, I was reading a book on Superstring Theory(Which is why I say not extra ones it proposed extra culred dimensions which if were sub-planck length would not be detectable to us),

Yep it is a issue of General Relativity, no need of extra dims to think about the problem.
 

What is Special Relativity?

Special Relativity is a theory developed by Albert Einstein in 1905 that describes how objects move in relation to each other at constant speeds and in the absence of gravitational forces. It is based on two main principles: the principle of relativity, which states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion, and the constancy of the speed of light, which states that the speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers regardless of their relative motion.

What are "curled up" spatial dimensions?

"Curled up" spatial dimensions refer to the concept that there may be extra dimensions beyond the three dimensions of space (length, width, and height) that we experience in our daily lives. These extra dimensions are thought to be "curled up" or compactified, meaning they are too small for us to detect or experience directly.

How does Special Relativity relate to curled up dimensions?

Special Relativity does not directly relate to curled up dimensions, as it is a theory that describes the behavior of objects in our three-dimensional space. However, some theories, such as string theory, suggest that the existence of curled up dimensions could help explain certain phenomena, such as gravity, that are not fully explained by Special Relativity.

Why are curled up dimensions important to study in physics?

Studying curled up dimensions is important because it could potentially provide a deeper understanding of the fundamental laws of physics and help us reconcile conflicting theories, such as General Relativity and quantum mechanics. It could also potentially lead to new technological advancements and applications.

Is there any evidence for the existence of curled up dimensions?

Currently, there is no direct evidence for the existence of curled up dimensions. However, some experiments in particle physics, such as those conducted at the Large Hadron Collider, are searching for signs of extra dimensions. Additionally, some theories, such as string theory, use curled up dimensions as a fundamental part of their framework.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
15
Views
8K
Back
Top